Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact

References

• America’s Pledge Initiative on Climate. (2018). Fulfilling America’s Pledge: How states, cities, and business are leading the United States to a low-carbon future.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B., Hale, T. N., & Roger, C. B. (2017). National policy and transnational governance of climate change: Substitutes or complements? International Studies Quarterly, 61(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbroek, R., Ford, J. D., Lesnikowski, A., Tanabe, A., Wang, F. M., Chen, C., Hsu, A., Hellmann, J. J., Pringle, P., Grecequet, M., Amado, J.-C., Huq, S., Lwasa, S., & Heymann, S. J. (2019). Tracking global climate change adaptation among governments. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0490-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris climate change Agreement: A new hope? American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288–319. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.110.2.0288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M. J., Newell, P., Paterson, M., VanDeveer, S. D., & Roger, C. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• C40 & ARUP. (2015). Powering climate action: Cities as global changemakers. C40 & ARUP. London.
   Google Scholar
• CDP. (2019). Cascading commitments: Driving ambitious action through supply chain engagement. CDP. London.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., Boran, I., van Asselt, H., Iacobuta, G., Niles, N., Rietig, K., Scobie, M., Bansard, J. S., Delgado Pugley, D., Delina, L. L., Eichhorn, F., Ellinger, P., Enechi, O., Hale, T., Hermwille, L., Hickmann, T., Honegger, M., Hurtado Epstein, A., La Hoz Theuer, S., … Wambugu, G. (2019). Promises and risks of nonstate action in climate and sustainability governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(3), e572. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S., Falkner, R., Goldberg, M., & van Asselt, H. (2018). Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of non-state climate actions. Climate Policy, 18(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClimateSouth. (2018). Cooperative climate action 2013–2018: Global performance and geographic scope.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. (1987). Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Project Appraisal, 2(4), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1987.9726638
   Google Scholar
• Croci, E., Lucchitta, B., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Martelli, S., & Molteni, T. (2017). Urban CO2 mitigation strategies under the Covenant of Mayors: An assessment of 124 European cities. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.165
   Google Scholar
• Faria, P., Hekman, J., Poivet, R., Stoakes, E., & Willoughby, C. (2017). ACT: Assessing Low Carbon transition. CDP. London.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. D., Hepburn, C., Ives, M. C., Hale, T., Wetzer, T., Mealy, P., Rafaty, R., Srivastav, S., & Way, R. (2019). Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition. Science, 364(6436), 132–134. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw7287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2000). Evaluating the ‘logical framework approach’ towards learning-oriented development evaluation. Public Administration and Development, 20(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-162X(200002)20:1<17::AID-PAD89>3.0.CO;2-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, J. M., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2020). A framework for assessing the impact of private climate governance. Energy Research & Social Science, 60, 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschick, M. (2018). Reflexive capacity in local networks for sustainable development: Integrating conflict and understanding into a multi-level perspective transition framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.842890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2016). “All hands on deck”: The Paris agreement and nonstate climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3-4), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Höhne, N., den Elzen, M., & Escalante, D. (2014). Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: A comparison of studies. Climate Policy, 14(1), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.849452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Sterl, S., & Gonzales-Zuñiga, S. (2016). The business end of climate change: How bold corporate action supported by smart policy can keep temperature rise below 2C.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Weinfurter, A., Xie, Y., Lütkehermöller, K., Chan, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., Drost, P., Faria, P., Gardiner, A., Gordon, D. J., Hale, T., Hultman, N. E., Moorhead, J., Reuvers, S., Setzer, J., Singh, N., … Widerberg, O. (2019). A research roadmap for quantifying non-state and subnational climate mitigation action. Nature Climate Change, 9(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0338-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, A., Tan, J., Ng, Y. M., Toh, W., Vanda, R., & Goyal, N. (2020). Performance determinants show European cities are delivering on climate mitigation. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0879-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, A., Weinfurter, A., Feierman, A., Xie, Y., Yeo, Z. Y., Lütkehermöller, K., & Roelfsema, M. (2018). Global climate action of regions, states and businesses. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/yale-nci-pbl-global-climate-action
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (1999). Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: The institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management, 24(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Intergovernmental panel on climate change special report on global warming of 1.5C.
   Google Scholar
• Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Hsu, A., Lui, S., Weinfurter, A., Chan, S., Hale, T., Clapper, A., Chang, A., & Höhne, N. (2020). Beyond national climate action: The impact of region, city, and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Policy, 20(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1740150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(1), e497. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, W. F., Creutzig, F., Callaghan, M. W., & Minx, J. C. (2019). Learning about urban climate solutions from case studies. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0440-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal, V. M. S., & Azevedo, I. (2016). Setting targets for local energy planning: Critical assessment and a new approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. (2018). Local energy agencies and cities’ participation in translocal climate governance. Environmental Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1798
   Google Scholar
• Lui, S., Kuramochi, T., Smit, S., Roelfsema, M., Hsu, A., Weinfurter, A., Chan, S., Hale, T., Fekete, H., Lütkehermöller, K., de Villafranca Casas, M. J., Nascimento, L., Sterl, S., & Höhne, N. (2020). Correcting course: The emission reduction potential of international cooperative initiatives. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1806021
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., & Steurer, R. (2018). Assessment practices in the policy and politics cycles: A contribution to reflexive governance for sustainable development? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 734–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.829750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, K., & Michaelowa, A. (2017). Transnational climate governance initiatives: Designed for effective climate change mitigation? International Interactions, 43(1), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2017.1256110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Å, Weitz, N., & Nilsson, M. (2016). Follow-up and review of the sustainable development goals: Alignment vs. internalization. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig, D., & Bakhtiari, F. (2020). Determinants of successful delivery by non-state actors: An exploratory study. Int Environ Agreements. https://doi.org/.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09482-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robiou du Pont, Y., Jeffery, M. L., Gütschow, J., Rogelj, J., Christoff, P., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Nature Climate Change, 7(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger, C., Hale, T., & Andonova, L. B. (2017). The comparative politics of transnational climate governance. International Interactions, 43(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2017.1252248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition framework. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartorius, R. H. (1991). The logical framework approach to project design and Management. Evaluation Practice, 12(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(91)90005-I
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. H. (2004). Abrupt non-linear climate change, irreversibility and surprise. Global Environmental Change, 14(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018). Yearbook of Global climate action 2018. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2019). Yearbook of climate action 2019. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2020). The logframe as a monitoring and evaluation tool for government interventions in a chaotic and complex environment. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v8i1.328
   Google Scholar
• Widerberg, O., & Stripple, J. (2016). The expanding field of cooperative initiatives for decarbonization: A review of five databases. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar