Performing accountability: face-to-face account-giving in multilateral climate transparency processes

References

• Abebe, A. M. (2009). Of shaming and Bargaining: African states and the Universal Periodic review of the United Nations human rights Council. Human Rights Law Review, 9(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn043
   Google Scholar
• Backstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of Networked climate governance: The rise of Transnational climate Partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernaz, N. (2009). Reforming the UN human rights Protection procedures: A legal Perspective on the establishment of the Universal Periodic review Mechanism. In K. Boyle (Ed.), New institutions for human rights Protection (pp. 75–92). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and Legitimacy in Earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1856–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEW [Clean Energy Wire]. (2018). Germany wants transparent global climate reporting to ensure trust. https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/germany-wants-transparent-global-climate-reporting-ensure-trust
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., & Pattberg, P. (2008). Private Rule-making and the politics of accountability: Analysing global Forest governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, H., & Larking, E. (eds.). (2015). Human rights and the Universal Periodic review: Rituals and ritualism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. (1995). The New sovereignty. Compliance with international Regulatory agreements. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez Redondo, E. (2008). Universal Periodic review of the UN human rights Council: An assessment of the first sessions. Chinese Journal of International Law, 7(3), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmn029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez Redondo, E. (2012). The Universal Periodic review – Is there Life beyond naming and shaming in human rights implementation. New Zealand Law Review, 4, 673–706.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, K., & Gupta, A. (2017). Governing by expertise: The contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9331-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. (2009). Copenhagen: Climate of Mistrust. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIV(52), 8–11. December 26.
   Google Scholar
• Etone, D. (2017). The Effectiveness of South Africa’s engagement with the Universal Periodic review (UPR): potential for ritualism? South African Journal on Human Rights, 33(2), 258–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2017.1362163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. W., & Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and Abuses of Power in world politics. The American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groff, M., & Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. (2018). The Rule of Law as a global public good: Exploring Trajectories for Democratizing global governance through increased accountability. In S. Cogolati, & J. Wouters (Eds.), The Commons and a New global governance? (pp. 130–159). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Boas, I., & Oosterveer, P. (2020). Transparency in global sustainability governance: To what effect? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1709281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Lövbrand, E., Turnhout, E., & Vijge, M. (2012). In pursuit of carbon accountability: The politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 726–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2016). Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Van Asselt, H. (2019). Transparency in multilateral climate politics: Furthering (or distracting from) accountability? Regulation & Governance, 13(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Vijge, M. J., Turnhout, E., & Pistorius, T. (2014). Making REDD+ transparent: The politics of measuring, reporting and verification systems. In A. Gupta, & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency in global environmental governance: Critical Perspectives (pp. 181–201). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. (2016). Legitimacy. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of governance (pp. 194–204). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., Groff, M., Tamás, P. A., Dahl, A. L., Harder, M., & Hassal, G. (2018). Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability. Climate Policy, 18(5), 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1331904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., & McGee, J. (2013). Legitimacy in an Era of Fragmentation: The case of global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinsky, S., & Gupta, A. (2019). Taming Equity in multilateral climate politics: A Shift from responsibilities to capacities. In J. Meadowcroft, D. Banister, E. Holden, O. Langhelle, K. Linnerud, & G. Gilpin (Eds.), Chapter 9 in what next for sustainable development? Our Common future at Thirty (pp. 159–179). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2005). OECD environmental performance review Programme: Accountability (f)or learning? Evaluation, 11(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389005055536
   Google Scholar
• Mao, J., & Sheng, X. (2016-2017). Strength of review and Scale of response: A quantitative analysis of human rights Council Universal Periodic review on China. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 7, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2020). Transparency, accountability and empowerment in Sustainability governance: A Conceptual review. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1661231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, E., & Ascherio, M. (2012). A Step ahead in promoting human rights: The Universal Periodic review of the UN human rights Council. Global Governance, 18(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01802006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milewicz, K. M., & Goodin, R. E. (2018). Deliberative capacity building through international Organisations: The case of the Universal Periodic review of human rights. British Journal of Political Science, 48 (2), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2008). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 122–153. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Lefeber, R. (2010). Holding countries to account. The Kyoto Protocol's compliance system after four years of experience. Climate Law, 1(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1163/CL-2010-006
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Kramarz, T. (eds.). (2019). Global environmental governance and the accountability Trap. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, M. (2009). Delimiting Democratic accountability. Political Studies, 57(1), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00720.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, S., Ganesan, K., & Gupta, V. (2017). Enhanced transparency framework in the Paris Agreement: Perspective of Parties. Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. K. M. (2011). Equality of Nations large and small: Testing the theory of the Universal Periodic review in the Asia-Pacific. Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Rights and the Law, 12(2), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1163/138819011X13215419937904
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. K. M. (2013). To see themselves as others see them: The five Permanent Members of the Security Council and the human rights Council's Universal Periodic review. Human Rights Quarterly, 35(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Africa. (2017). Submission by South Africa to the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement on Transparency of Action and Support, 13 March 2017. On file with author.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2010). Public accountability and the public Sphere of international governance. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00243.x
   Google Scholar
• Treves, T., Tanzi, A., Pineschi, L., Pitea, C., Ragni, C., & Jacur, F. R. (2009). Non-Compliance procedures and mechanisms and the Effectiveness of international environmental agreements. T.M.C. Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2016). Parties’ Views Regarding Modalities, Procedures and Guidelines for the Transparency Framework for Action and Support Referred to in Article 13 of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/APA/2016/INF.3. UNFCCC, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018). Decisions adopted at the Climate Change Conference in Katowice, Poland, 2-14 December 2018. Modalities, procedures and guidelines for the transparency framework for action and support referred to in Article 13 of the Paris Agreement. Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Paris Agreement.
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, H., Weikmans, R., & Timmons Roberts, J. (2019). Pocket Guide to Transparency under the UNFCCC. European Capacity Building Initiative (ecbi), Available at: https://ecbi.org/news/pocket-guide-transparency-under-unfccc
   Google Scholar
• Voigt, C. (2016). The compliance and implementation Mechanism of the Paris Agreement. RECIEL, 25(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12155
   Google Scholar
• Von Stein, J. (2016). Making Promises, Keeping Promises: Democracy, Ratification and compliance in international human rights Law. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Wiser, G. (2002). The implementation and compliance Regimes under the climate change Convention and its Kyoto Protocol. RECIEL, 11(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00316
   Google Scholar
• Weikmans, R., van Asselt, H., & Timmons Roberts, J. (2020). Transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement and their (un)likely impact on strengthening the ambition of nationally determined contributions. Climate Policy, 20(4), 511–526. doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1695571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar