Border carbon adjustments and industrial competitiveness in a European Green Deal

References

• Böhringer, C., Balistreri, E. J., & Rutherford, T. F. (2012). The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an energy Modeling Forum study (EMF 29). Energy Economics, 34, S97–S110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branger, F., Quirion, P., & Chevallier, J. (2016). Carbon leakage and competitiveness of cement and steel industries under the EU ETS: Much ado about nothing. The Energy Journal, 37(3), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.3.fbra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019). Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: Lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cendra, J. (2006). Can emissions trading schemes be coupled with border tax adjustments? An analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 15(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2006.00518.x
   Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis-Ryan, A., Bataille, C., & Jotzo, F. (2016). Managing carbon-intensive materials in a decarbonizing world without a global price on carbon. Climate Policy, 16(S1), S110–S128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1176008
   Google Scholar
• Dermailly, D., & Quirion, P. (2006). CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: Grandfathering versus output-based allocation. Climate Policy, 6(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019 COM(2019) 640 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Inception impact assessment: Carbon border adjustment mechanism. Ref. Ares(2020)1350037, 4 March 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., & Fox, A. K. (2012). Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Peters, W. (2019). Border adjustments supplementing nationally determined carbon pricing. Environmental and Resource Economics, 73(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0251-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D., Hepburn, C., & Ruta, G. (2012). Trade, climate change, and the political game theory of border carbon adjustments. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(2), 368–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, J. (2013). Changing climate for carbon taxes: Who’s Afraid of the WTO? German Marshall Fund of the United States climate and energy paper series.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, K. (2014). Carbon-related border adjustment and WTO Law. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• I4CE. (2015). Exploring the EU ETS beyond 2020: A first assessment of the EU Commission’s proposals for Phase IV of the EU ETS (2021-2030). COPEC Research Program: The Coordination of EU policies on Energy and CO2 with the EU ETS by 2030. Institute for Climate Economics and Enerdata, November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.), Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (pp. 32). World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Ismer, R., & Neuhoff, K. (2004). Border tax adjustments: A feasible way to address non-participation in emission trading. CMI Working Paper 36, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019). Why does emissions trading under the EU emissions trading system (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature. Climate Policy, 19(4), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcu, A., Mehling, M., & Cosbey, A. (2020). Border carbon adjustments in the EU: Issues and options. European Roundtable on Climate Change and Sustainable Transition.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). The impact of the European Union emissions trading scheme on regulated firms: What Is the evidence after Ten years? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehling, M. A., & Ritz, R. A. (2020). Going beyond default intensities in an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2087, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehling, M., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Dröge, S., & Verkuijl, C. (2019). Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law, 113(3), 433–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegele, H., & Zaklan, A. (2019). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., Ismer, R., Acworth, W., Ancygier, A., Fischer, C., Haussner, M., Kangas, H.-L., Kim, Y.-G., Munnings, C., Owen, A., Pauliuk, S., Sartor, O., Sato, M., Stede, J., Sterner, T., Tervooren, M., Tusveld, R., Wood, R., Xiliang, Z., Zetterberg, L., & Zipperer, V. (2016). Inclusion of consumption of carbon-intensive materials in emissions trading: An option for carbon pricing post-2020. Report by Climate Strategies, May 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, K., & Ritz, R. A. (2019). Carbon cost pass-through in industrial sectors. EPRG Working Paper 1935, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, H., Neuhoff, K., & Lin, X. (2020). The impact of implementing a consumption charge on carbon-intensive materials in Europe. Climate Policy, 20(S1), S74–S89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1605969
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinaud, J. (2005). Industrial competitiveness under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. International Energy Agency, Information Paper, February 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Venmans, F., Ellis, J., & Nachtigall, D. (2020). Carbon pricing and competitiveness: Are they at odds? Climate Policy, 20(9), 1070–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1805291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verde, S. F., Teixidó, J., Marcantonini, C., & Labandeira, X. (2019). Free allocation rules in the EU emissions trading system: What does the empirical literature show? Climate Policy, 19(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1549969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2020, May). State and Trends of carbon pricing 2020. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar