Climate justice and rights-based litigation in a post-Paris world

References

• Acosta Alvarado, P. A., & Rivas-Ramírez, D. (2018). A Milestone in environmental and future generations’ rights protection: Recent legal developments before the Colombian Supreme Court. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(3), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelman, S. (2018). Human rights in the Paris Agreement: Too little, Too late? Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelman, S., & Lewis, B. (2018). Symposium foreword: Rights-based approaches to climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers, J. H. (2018). Human rights and climate change. Security and Human Rights, 28(1-4), 113–144. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801009
   Google Scholar
• Badrinarayana, D. (2009). The emerging constitutional challenge of climate change: India in perspective. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 19(1), 1–38. https://bit.ly/31paVc7
   Google Scholar
• Bouwer, K. (2018). The unsexy future of climate change litigation. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg, M., & Romera, B. M. (2020). Loss and damage after Paris: More bark than bite? Climate Policy, 20(6), 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1778885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, L., Staal, T., Nijdam, J. E., Werner, W. G. (2019). Climate action as positive human rights obligation: The appeals judgment in Urgenda v The Netherlands. In Janne E. Nijman & Wouter G. Werner (Eds.), Netherlands yearbook of international law 2018: Populism and international law (pp. 223–244). TMC Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnwath, L. J. S. C. (2016). Climate change adjudication after Paris: A reflection. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colenbrander, S., Dodman, D., & Mitlin, D. (2018). Using climate finance to advance climate justice: The politics and practice of channelling resources to the local level. Climate Policy, 18(7), 902–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1388212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2016). A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1147887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, K. J., & Jans, J. H. (2015). The Urgenda decision: Netherlands liable for role in causing dangerous global climate change. Journal of Environmental Law, 27(3), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqv030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demanda Generaciones v. Minambiente (Bogotá District Court 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Doelle, M., & Seck, S. (2020). Loss & damage from climate change: From concept to remedy? Climate Policy, 20(6), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1630353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faure, M. G. (2016). In the aftermath of the disaster: Liability and compensation mechanisms as tools to reduce disaster risks. Stanford Journal of International Law, 52(1), 95–178. https://bit.ly/39Z7sFl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., Scotford, E., & Barritt, E. (2017). The legally disruptive nature of climate change. The Modern Law Review, 80(2), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, A., Vanclay, F., Hiller, C., & Wilson, S. (2014). Challenging dominant discourses of climate change. Climatic Change, 127(3), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1268-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, W., Bals, C., & Grimm, J. (2019). The case of Huaraz: First climate lawsuit on loss and damage against an energy company before German courts. In Reinhard Mechler, Laurens M. Bouwer, Thomas Schinko, Swenja Surminski, & JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer (Eds.), Loss and damage from climate change: Concepts, methods and policy options (pp. 475–482). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ganguly, G., Setzer, J., & Heyvaert, V. (2018). If at first you don’t succeed: Suing corporations for climate change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38(4), 841–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaynor, K. A., Lippard, B. S., & Peloso, M. E. (2010). Challenges plaintiffs Face in Litigating Federal common-Law climate change claims. Environmental Law Reporter, 40(9). https://bit.ly/3ifeIjl
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/4145316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gsottbauer, E., Gampfer, R., Bernold, E., & Delas, A.-M. (2018). Broadening the scope of loss and damage to legal liability: An experiment. Climate Policy, 18(5), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1317628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. (2010). A history of international climate change policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(5), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, L. J., & Otto, F. E. L. (2018). Adapting attribution science to the climate extremes of tomorrow. Environmental Research Letters, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf4cc
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2001). The Strengths and Limitations of Case Study Research. Paper presented at the Learning and Skills Development Agency Conference: Making an Impact on Policy and Practice, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, R. B. (2012). Intergenerational justice. In John S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, & David Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 338–354). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., & Tigre, M. A. (2016). Trends in climate justice litigation: The Dutch case and global repercussions. Environmental Law Institute, 571–596. https://bit.ly/3etRFPt
   Google Scholar
• Huggel, C., Wallimann-Helmer, I., Stone, D., & Cramer, W. (2016). Reconciling justice and attribution research to advance climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(10), 901–908. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Bar Association. (2014). Achieving justice and human rights in an era of climate disruption. 1-238. https://bit.ly/3gjPCPt
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Annex II: Glossary. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1757–1776). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, R. A., Jones, R. G., Boyd, E., Young, H. R., Otto, F. E. L., Huggel, C., & Fuglestvedt, J. S. (2019). Attribution: How is it relevant for loss and damage policy and practice? In Reinhard Mechler, Laurens M. Bouwer, Thomas Schinko, Swenja Surminski, & JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer (Eds.), et al. (Eds.), Loss and damage from climate change: Concepts, methods and policy options (pp. 113–154). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. (2016). Lacking rights and justice in a burning world: The case for granting standing to future generations in climate change litigation. Tilburg Law Review, 21(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-02101002
   Google Scholar
• Juliana v. United States, No. 153-1 (Oregon Ninth Court 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Juliana v. United States, No. 6:15-cv-01517-TC (Oregon District Court — Eugene Division 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kehinde, B. (2014). Applicability of risk transfer tools to manage loss and damage from slow-onset climatic risks. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00994-0
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M., Roberts, J. T., Huq, S., & Hoffmeister, V. (2018). The Paris framework for climate change capacity building. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M., Robinson, S.-a., Weikmans, R., Ciplet, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens. Climatic Change, 161(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02563-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinsky, S. (2018). An initial scoping of transitional justice for global climate governance. Climate Policy, 18(6), 752–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1377594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinsky, S., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2009). Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy. Climate Policy, 9(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2008.0583b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, E. (2017). Responsibility and liability for climate loss and damage after Paris. Climate Policy, 17(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1197095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2019). Juliana and the political generativity of climate litigation. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 43, 479–506. https://bit.ly/3fwP7k6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, B. S., & Patz, J. A. (2018). Climate change, human rights, and social justice. Annals of Global Health, 81(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. (2018). The rights of future generations within the post-Paris climate regime. Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liszka, J. (2010). Lessons from the Exxon Valdez oil spill: A case study in retributive and corrective justice for harm to the environment. Ethics and the Environment, 15(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2979/ete.2010.15.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzetti, R. L. (2017). Complex judicial remedies in environmental litigation: The Argentine experience. Journal of Environmental Law, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loth, M. A. (2018). Too big to trial? Lessons from the Urgenda case. Uniform Law Review, 23(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/uny015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (2017). Climate justice, adaptation and the Paris Agreement: A recipe for disasters? Environmental Politics, 26(3), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1287626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, J. T., & Ashcraft, C. M. (2020). A framework for implementing socially just climate adaptation. Climatic Change, 160(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02705-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjanac, S., & Patton, L. (2018). Extreme weather event attribution science and climate change litigation: An essential step in the causal chain? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 36(3), 265–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2018.1451020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechler, R., Calliari, E., Bouwer, L. M., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Aerts, J., Botzen, W., Boyd, E., Deckard, N. D., Fuglestvedt, J. S., González-Eguino, M., Haasnoot, M., Handmer, J., Haque, M., Heslin, A., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Huggel, C., Huq, S., … & Zommers, Z., et al. (2019). Science for loss and damage. Findings and propositions. In Reinhard Mechler, Laurens M. Bouwer, Thomas Schinko, Swenja Surminski, & JoAnne Linnerooth-Bayer (Eds.), Loss and damage from climate change: Concepts, methods and policy options (pp. 3–37). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mechler, R., Singh, C., Ebi, K., Djalante, R., Thomas, A., James, R., Tschakert, P., Wewerinke-Singh, M., Schinko, T., Ley, D., Nalau, J., Bouwer, L. M., Huggel, C., Huq, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Surminski, S., Pinho, P., Jones, R., Boyd, E., & Revi, A. (2020). Loss and damage and limits to adaptation: Recent IPCC insights and implications for climate science and policy. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00807-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. H., & Roser, D. (2006). Distributive justice and climate change. The allocation of emission rights. Analyse & Kritik, 28(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2006-0207
   Google Scholar
• Mills-Novoa, M., & Liverman, D. M. (2019). Nationally determined contributions: Material climate commitments and discursive positioning in the NDCs. WIREs Climate Change, 10(5), e589. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.589
   Google Scholar
• Moellendorf, D. (2012). Climate change and global justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okereke, C., & Coventry, P. (2016). Climate justice and the international regime: Before, during, and after Paris. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(6), 834–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osofsky, H. M. (2010). The continuing importance of climate change litigation. Climate Law, 1(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.3233/CL-2010-002
   Google Scholar
• Paiement, P. (2020). Urgent agenda: How climate litigation builds transnational narratives. Transnational Legal Theory, 11(1-2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1772617
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. J., Thaler, T., Hoffmann, M., Hughes, S., Oels, A., Chu, E., Mert, A., Huitema, D., Burch, S., & Jordan, A. (2018). Political feasibility of 1.5°C societal transformations: The role of social justice. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauw, P., Mbeva, K., & van Asselt, H. (2019). Subtle differentiation of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0298-6
   Google Scholar
• Peel, J., & Lin, J. (2019). Transnational climate litigation: The contribution of the Global South. American Journal of International Law, 113(4), 679–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2018). A rights turn in climate change litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2020). Climate change litigation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-022420-122936
   Google Scholar
• Pfrommer, T., Goeschl, T., Proelss, A., Carrier, M., Lenhard, J., Martin, H., Niemeier, U., & Schmidt, H. (2019). Establishing causation in climate litigation: Admissibility and reliability. Climatic Change, 152(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porfiriev, B. (2015). Climate change as a major slow-onset hazard to development: An integrated approach to bridge the policy gap. Environmental Hazards, 14(2), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2015.1019823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S.-a. (2018). Climate change adaptation limits in small island developing states. In W. Leal Filho, & J. Nalau (Eds.), Limits to climate change adaptation (pp. 263–281). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S.-a. (2020). Climate change adaptation in SIDS: A systematic review of the literature pre and post the IPCC Fifth assessment report. WIREs Climate Change, 11(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.653
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., & Shine, T. (2018). Achieving a climate justice pathway to 1.5 °C. Nature Climate Change, 8(7), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0189-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. (2019). Urgenda II and its discontents. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 13(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2019/2/8
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., & Woerdman, E. (2016). Situating Urgenda v the Netherlands within comparative climate change litigation. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1132825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadinsky, A. (2014). Redefining En Banc review in the federal courts of appeals. Fordham Law Review, 84(2), 2001–2035. https://bit.ly/2Xtmqyo
   Google Scholar
• Sands, P. Q. C. (2016). Climate change and the rule of law: Adjudicating the future in international law. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaresi, A. (2016). The Paris Agreement: A new beginning? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1133983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapper, A. (2018). Climate justice and human rights. International Relations, 32(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818782595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setzer, J., & Vanhala, L. C. (2019). Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance. WIREs Climate Change, 10(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.580
   Google Scholar
• Solnit, D. (2018, November 2). The Climate Trial of the Century. https://bit.ly/3gTFhJW
   Google Scholar
• Surminski, S., & Lopez, A. (2015). Concept of loss and damage of climate change – A new challenge for climate decision-making? Climate and Development, 7(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2014.934770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint, P. (2020). Loss and damage and climate litigation: The case for greater interlinkage. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12335
   Google Scholar
• Toussaint, P., & Martínez Blanco, A. (2020). A human rights-based approach to loss and damage under the climate change regime. Climate Policy, 20(6), 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1630354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2017). The status of climate change litigation – A global review (ISBN: 978-92-807-3656-4). https://bit.ly/3076sKE
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2019). Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). https://bit.ly/2EBQVbm
   Google Scholar
• Urgenda Foundation v. State of the Netherlands, No. C/09/456689 (Hague District Court 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Urgenda Foundation v. State of the Netherlands (Supreme Court 2019).
   Google Scholar
• van der Geest, K., & Warner, K. (2020). Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth assessment report (Working Group II): A text-mining analysis. Climate Policy, 20(6), 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1704678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhala, L. (2013). The comparative politics of courts and climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(3), 447–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.765686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyen, R. (2015). Loss and damage due to climate change: Attribution and causation - Where climate science and law meet. International Journal of Global Warming, 8(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgw.2015.071968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallimann-Helmer, I. (2015). Justice for climate loss and damage. Climatic Change, 133(3), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1483-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weikmans, R., Asselt, H. v., & Roberts, J. T. (2020). Transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement and their (un)likely impact on strengthening the ambition of nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Climate Policy, 20(4), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1695571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, T., & Pittock, J. (2017). Human dimensions of environmental change in small island developing states: Some common themes. Regional Environmental Change, 17(4), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1135-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wewerinke-Singh, M., & Salili, D. H. (2020). Between negotiations and litigation: Vanuatu’s perspective on loss and damage from climate change. Climate Policy, 20(6), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1623166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, H. S. (2011). The justiciability of climate change: A comparison of US and Canadian approaches. Dalhousie Law Journal, 34(2), 529–552. https://bit.ly/30v9aLl
   Google Scholar
• Wood, N., & Roelich, K. (2019). Tensions, capabilities, and justice in climate change mitigation of fossil fuels. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed., Vol. 34). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar