The Swedish climate policy framework as a means for climate policy integration: an assessment

References

• Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of déjà Vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averchenkova, A., Fankhauser, S., & Finnegan, J. J (2020) ‘The impact of strategic climate legislation: evidence from expert interviews on the UK Climate Change Act’. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1819190
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. (Eds.). (1998). Trust and governance. Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an agenda. Political Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (2010). Vote Blue, go Blue: have conservatives forgotten about the environment? In: Paper presented at the Political Studies Association 2010 Conference. http://www.psa.ac.uk/journals/pdf/5/2010/130_1187.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N., & Ockwell, D. (2007). New Labour, New Environment? In: An Analysis of the Labour Government’s Policy on Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss. Report to Friends of the Earth. http://celp.org.uk/projects/foe/docs/fullreportfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EEA, Coffey, C., Farmer, A., & Jacobsen, C. (2004). Environmental policy integration. Paper 2. Administrative Culture and Practices for EPI in Europe. Brussels: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, J., & Smith, G. (1999). Politics and the environment: From theory to practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Geus, M. (2004). The environment versus individual freedom and convenience. In M. Wissenburg, & Y. Levy (Eds.), Liberal democracy and environmentalism. The end of environmentalism? (pp. 87–99). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 185–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The Politics of the earth. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A. (2016). The four faces of the environmental state: Environmental governance regimes in 28 countries. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1077619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersly, R. (2020). Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: Looking back, looking forward. Environmental Politics, 29(2), 214–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1594536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. (2005). Environmental policy integration in Europe: State of play and an evaluation framework. European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., Oskarsson, H., Wägnerud, L., & Townsend, A. (2017). Metodpraktikan: Konsten att studera samhälle, individ oah marknad. Norsteds Juridik.
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Averchenkova, A., & Finnegan, J. (2018). 10 years of the UK climate change act. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Finnveden, G., & Åkerman, J. (2009). Förbifart Stockholm, miljön och klimatet – en fallstudie inom vägplaneringen. Royal Institute of Technology: Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Frickel, S., & Davidson, D. J. (2004). Building environmental states: Legitimacy and rationalization in sustainability governance. International Sociology, 19(1), 89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of climate change. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halperin, S., & Heath, O. (2012). Political research. Methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2010). Government failure, rent-seeking, and capture: The design of climate change policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grq006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertin, J., & Berkhout, F. (2003). Analysing institutional strategies for Environmental Policy Integration: The case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080305603
   Google Scholar
• Hill, K. (2009). The UK climate change act 2008 – lessons for national climate laws. ClientEarth, London and Brussels. http://www.clientearth.org/reports/climate-and-energy-lessons-from-the-climate-change-act.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hysing, E. (2014). A green star fading? A critical assessment of Swedish environmental policy change. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24, 262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2019). Climate change and land. An IPCC Special Report on climate chane, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, K., Volkery, A., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Instruments for environmental policy integration in 30 OECD countries. In A. J. Jordan & A. Lenschow (Eds.), Innovation in environmental policy. Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 24–44).
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2020). Miljöpolitikens villkor. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2002). Environmental policy in the European Union: Actors, institutions and processes. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Van Asselt, H., & Forster, J. (Eds.). (2018). Governing climate change. Polycentricity in action? Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Innovation in environmental policy?: Integrating the environment for sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. (2021). Sweden’s climate act – its origin and emergence, climate policy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1922339
   Google Scholar
• Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettner, C., & Kletzan-Slamanig, D. (2018). Climate policy integration on the national and Regional level: A case study for Austria and styria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(4), 259–269.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. M. (2004). From environmental protection to sustainable development: The challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. In W. M. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for Sustainable development (pp. 191–220). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. M., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, J., Elofsson, A., Sterner, T., & Åkerman, J. (2019). International and national climate policies for aviation: A review. Climate Policy, 19(6), 787–799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1562871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A. (2002). Environmental policy integration. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., & Zito, A. (1998). Blurring or shifting of policy frames? Institutionalization of the economic-environmental policy linkage in the European community. Governance, 11(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberatore, A. (1997). The integration of sustainable development objectives into EU policy-making: Barriers and prospects. In S. Baker, M. Kousis, D. Richardson, & S. Young (Eds.), The politics of sustainable development: Theory, policy and practice within the European Union (pp. 107–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., & Elander, I. (2012). Ecological modernization in practice? The case of sustainable development in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.737234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2013). The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK climate change act. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1339–1348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L. J. (2004). Sweden and ecological governance: Straddling the fence. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S., Carss, D., Ferrand, N., Görg, C., Jensen, A., Kivimaa, P., Kuhlicke, C., Kuindersma, W., Máñez, M., Melanen, M., Monni, S., Branth Pedersen, A., Reinert, H., & van Bommel, S. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. PEER Report No 2. Helsinki: Partnership for European Environmental Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P., Hyvättinen, H., & Kivimaa, P. (2008). The role of policy instruments in the innovation and diffusion of environmentally friendlier technologies: Popular claims versus case study experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), S162–S170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, S. L., & Steurer, R. (2019). Taking stock of climate change acts in Europe: Living policy processes or symbolic gestures? Climate Policy, 19(8), 1052–1065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1623164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. (2005). ). learning, frames and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c0405j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Eckerberg, K. (Eds.). (2007). Environmental policy integration in practice. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Persson, Å. (2003). Framework for Analysing Environmental Policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5(4), 333–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908032000171648
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund, L. (2020). Att ta tempen på klimatpolitiska ramverk: ett fall av påverkansfaktorer för klimatpolicyintegrering på lokal nivå. Master’s thesis. Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). OECD:s granskning av Sveriges miljöpolitik. OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Sweden 2014. (Stockholm: Miljödepartementet).
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Å. (2007). Different perspectives on EPI. In M. Nilsson, & K. Eckerberg (Eds.), Environmental policy integration in practice: Shaping institutions for learning (pp. 25–48). Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Å, & Runhaar, H. (2018). Conclusion: Drawing lesons for environmental policy integration and prospects for future research. Environmental Science and Policy, 85, 141–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, Å, Runhaar, H., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Mullally, G., Russel, D., & Widmer, A. (2018). Editorial: Environmental policy integration: Taking stock of policy practice in different contexts. Environmental Science and Policy, 85, 113–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. J., Peterson, H. L., Jones, M. D., Garrard, S. P., & Vu, T. (2017). There and back again: A tale of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 45, S13–S46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, T., & Okereke, C. (2007). The politics of climate change. In C. Okereke (Ed.), The Politics of the environment (pp. 116–135). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer, & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 145–166). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1994). Frame reflection. BasicBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Rollinson, S. (2010). Changing dynamics of environmental politics in Britain: A case study of the UK Climate Change Act. Polis 3, Winter 2010. http://www.polis.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/students/student-journal/ug-summer-10/simonrollinson-summer-10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Romson, Å. (2020). The Swedish climate policy framework including the climate act. In T. L. Muinzer (Ed.), National climate change acts. The emergence, form and nature of national framework climate legislation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & UIttenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., Wilk, B., Persson, Å, Uittenbroek, C., & Wamsler, C. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation: Taking stock about “what works” from empirical research worldwide. Regional Environmental Change, 18(4), 1201–1210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1259-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEPA. (2020). Sveriges klimatmål och klimatpolitiska ramverk. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Miljoarbete-i-samhallet/Miljoarbete-i-Sverige/Uppdelat-efter-omrade/Klimat/Sveriges-klimatlag-ochklimatpolitiska-ramverk/
   Google Scholar
• SGI. (2020). Sustainable governance indicators 2020: Sweden: Environmental policies. URL: https://www.sgi-network.org/2020/Sweden/Environmental_Policies
   Google Scholar
• Skr. (2013). Riksrevisionens rapport om klimat för pengarna. Government communication. Swedish Parliamentary Record.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg, C. (2011). Environmental policy integration in bioenergy. Learning across sectors and levels? Doctoral thesis. Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg, C., & Eckerberg, K. (2013). Rising policy conflicts in Europe over bioenergy and forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 3(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.015
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2016:21. Ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk för Sverige. Statens offentliga utredningar. Stockholm: Swedish Parliamentary Record.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Climate Policy Council. (2020). Report nr 3 of the Swedish Climate Policy Council.
   Google Scholar
• WCED. (1987). Our common future. United nations world commission on environment and development. Oxford.
   Google Scholar