Convergent evolution: framework climate legislation in Australia

References

• ACT (Australian Capital Territory) Government. (2019). Climate change and greenhouse gas reduction (Renewable Electricity Target) Amendment Act 2019.
   Google Scholar
• ACT (Australian Capital Territory) Parliament. (2009). Legislative assembly, standing committee on climate change, environment and water, inquiry into ACT Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets. Interim Report – Updated October. https://www.parliament.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/372300/CCEW02_Green_Gas_revised_inclu_errata.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2019). State and territories greenhouse gas inventories 2017: Australian National Greenhouse Accounts. Department of Environment and Energy. Retrieved from: https://www.industry.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-07/nga-state-and-territory-greenhouse-gas-inventories-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. (1991). Review article: What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. (2018). The role of national framework legislation in implementing Australia's emission reduction commitments under the Paris agreement. University of Western Australia Law Review, 43(1), 240–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer, J., & Kuiper, G. (2021). A grid Dominated by wind and solar Is possible -South Australia: A window into the future. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, 1-39. https://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/A-Grid-Dominated-by-Wind-and-Solar-Is-Possible_June-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N., & Childs, M. (2018). Friends of the earth as a policy entrepreneur: ‘The Big ask’ campaign for a UK Climate Change Act. Environmental Politics, 27(6), 994–1013. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1368151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, P. (2014). Power Failure: The Inside Story of Climate Politics Under Rudd and gillard. Black Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, David. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combet, G., Whetton, P., & Stephenson, L. (2019). Independent expert panel: Interim emissions reduction targets for victoria (2021-2030) Final Report. Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Coorey, P.. (2021). PM inches closer to net zero by 2050, Financial Review, 1 February. At: https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/pm-inches-closer-to-net-zero-by-2050-20210201-p56ybg
   Google Scholar
• Copland, S. (2020). Anti-politics and Global Climate Inaction: The case of the Australian Carbon Tax. Critical Sociology, 46(4-5), 623–641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519870230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for the Australian Federation (CAF). (2007). Council for the Australian Federation Declaration on Climate Change, 9 February. Retrieved from: https://www.caf.gov.au/Documents/CAF%20Declaration%20on%20Climate%20Change%20-%209%20Feb%202007.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, K. (2017). Up and down with climate politics 2013–2016: The repeal of carbon pricing in Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(3), 1–13, e458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, K. H. (2015). The enigma of state climate change policy innovation. In K. Robbins (Ed.), The Law and policy of Environmental federalism: A comparative analysis (pp. 169–187). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Gennailia, C., & Collins, M. (2015). The political economy of passing climate change legislation: Evidence from a survey’. Global Environmental Change, 35, 52–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farstad, F. M. (2016). From consensus to polarisation: What explains variation in party agreement on climate change? PhD thesis, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• FOE (Friends of the Earth). (2018). ‘Act on Climate’’: The story so far, Blog, 17 January. Retrieved from: https://www.actonclimate.org.au/the_story_so_far
   Google Scholar
• Garnaut, R. (2008). The Garnaut Climate Change review. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garnaut, R. (2011). The Garnaut Review Update 2011: Australia in the Global response to climate change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Germanwatch. (2021). Climate Change Performance Index. Retrieved from: https://germanwatch.org/en/CCPI Accessed 4 June 2021
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govt. SA (Government of South Australia). (2021). South Australia’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Department for Environment and Water. Retrieved from: https://www.environment.sa.gov.au/topics/climate-change/south-australias-greenhouse-gas-emissions (retrieved 9 June 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Groom, M. (2014). Tasmanian Climate Action Council, Media Release, 5 June. Retrieved from: http://www.premier.tas.gov.au/releases/tasmanian_climate_action_council
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, P. (2021 29 March). Turnbull named head of NSW government’s climate advisory board. Sydney Morning Herald.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. (2013). Federalism and climate policy innovation: A Critical reassessment. Canadian Public Policy, 39(Supplement 2), S95–S108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/CPP.39.Supplement2.S95
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs Australia. (2016). Discussion Paper on the Independent Review of the Climate Change (State Action) Act 2008, 18 October. http://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/divisions/climatechange/Climate_Change_Priorities/review_of_the_climate_change_act
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Special issue. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., & Paterson, M. (2013). Drivers of national climate policy. Climate Policy, 13(5), 547–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.811333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2013). The political sustainability of climate policy: The case of the UK Climate Change Act. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1339–1348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreevy, M., MacDougall, C., Fisher, M., Henley, M., & Baum, F. (2021). Expediting a renewable energy transition in a privatised market via public policy: The case of south Australia 2004-18. Energy Policy, 148(4), 111940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111940
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Winning, M. A. (2012). A review of the role and remit of the committee on climate change. Energy Policy, 41, 466–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D., & Hobbs, M. (2017). Fighting for coal: Public relations and the campaigns against lower carbon Pollution policies in Australia. In B. Brevini, & G. Murdock (Eds.), Carbon capitalism and communication: Confronting climate crisis (pp. 115–129). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M. (2020). Carbon captured: How business and Labor control climate politics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mounster, B. (2014). Axed Tasmanian Climate Action Council re-forms as Climate Tasmania, The Mercury, 5 December. https://www.themercury.com.au/news/tasmania/axed-tasmanian-climate-action-council-reforms-as-climate-tasmania/news-story/bbce8cac9a03c52cb1ae5cccfecace17
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P., & Slominski, P. (2017). The politics of learning: Developing an emissions trading scheme in Australia. Global Environmental Politic, 17(3), 51–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, S. L., & Steurer, R. (2019). Taking stock of Climate Change acts in Europe: Living policy processes or symbolic gestures? Climate Policy, 19(8), 1052–1065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1623164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, A. (2016). Fraternal foreign policy transfer? Evaluating the case of Australian Labor and British Labor. Policy Studies, 37(5), 456–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1188909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearse, R. (2017). Pricing carbon in Australia: Contestation, the State and market failure. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R., & Nachmany, N. (2019). A very human business’—transnational networking initiatives and domestic climate action. Global Environmental Change, 54, 250–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe, B. G., Roman, M., & Dobelis, A. N. (2005). State competition as a source driving climate change mitigation. NYU Environmental Law Journal, 14(1), 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Rann, M. (2006). Speech. South Australia House of Assembly, Parliamentary Debates, Hansard, Wednesday 28 June, 673-674.
   Google Scholar
• Rattenbury, S. (2010). Speech. Legislative Assembly for the ACT, Hansard, 19 October, 4579.
   Google Scholar
• Rattenbury, S. (2018). Speech. Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2018 Week 8, Hansard, 16 August, 3051.
   Google Scholar
• Rietig, K., & Laing, T. (2017). Policy stability in climate governance: The case of the United Kingdom. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27, 575–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steves, F., & Teytelboym, A. (2013). Political Economy of Climate Change Policy, October 16. SSEE Working Paper 13-02. Retrieved from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2456538 or https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2456538
   Google Scholar
• Tasmanian Government. (2014). Climate Change (State Action) Amendment Act 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tasmanian Government. (2017). Tasmanian Government response to the Independent Review. Retrieved from: http://www.dpac.tas.gov.au/divisions/climatechange/Climate_Change_Priorities/review_of_the_climate_change_act
   Google Scholar
• Tews, K. (2005). The diffusion of environmental policy innovations: Cornerstones of an analytical framework. European Environment, 15(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.378
   Google Scholar
• Tiernan, A. (2008). The Council for the Australian Federation: A new structure of Australian federalism. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00576.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, P. (2017). Leaders and laggards: Climate policy ambition in developed states. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 28–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torney, D. (2017). If at first you don’t succeed: The development of climate change legislation in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 32(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2017.1299134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. (2013). The great divide: Political candidate and voter polarisation over Global warming in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 59(3), 397–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria State Government. (2018). Victorian Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. Retrieved from: https://www.climatechange.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033/395079/Victorian-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-Report-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, M., Skarbek, A., & Lyster, R. (2015). Independent Review of the Climate Change Act 2010. Victorian Government. Retrieved from: https://www.climatechange.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/55306/Independent-Review-of-the-Climate-Change-Act-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, M. (2020). The carbon club. Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (2011). Review of the Climate Change Act 2010, December 2011. Department of Premier and Cabinet, Victoria. Retrieved September 20, 2020, from https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/file_uploads/ReviewClimateChangeAct2010_qbrxXmH2.pdf
   Google Scholar