Does climate advocacy matter? The importance of competing interest groups for national climate policies

References

• Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Political competition, path dependence, and the strategy of sustainable energy transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D., & Waterman, R. P. (2002). Fixed–Effects Negative Binomial Regression Models. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9531.00117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B., Hale, T. N., & Roger, C. B. (2017). National policy and transnational governance of climate change: Substitutes or complements? International Studies Quarterly, 61(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate changeClimate of scepticism. US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, Who loses, and Why. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, P., & Urpelainen, J. (2016). It Is All about political incentives: Democracy and the renewable feed-in tariff. The Journal of Politics, 78(2), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1086/684791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J., & Hanegraaff, M. (2019). No borders, no bias? Comparing advocacy group populations at the national and transnational levels. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 8(3), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-019-00060-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J., Hanegraaff, M., & Braun, C. (2017). Is the EU different? Comparing the diversity of national and EU-level systems of interest organisations. West European Politics, 40(5), 1109–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1308695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Böhmelt, T., & Koubi, V. (2013). Is there a democracy–civil society paradox in global environmental governance? Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., & Hanegraaff, M. (2017). Balancing friends and foes: Explaining advocacy styles at global diplomatic conferences. The Review of International Organizations, 12(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-016-9262-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björnberg, K. E., Karlsson, M., Gilek, M., & Hansson, S. O. (2017). Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T. (2013). Civil society lobbying and countries’ climate change policies: A matching approach. Climate Policy, 13(6), 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.788870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M., & Hallström, K. T. (2010). NGO power in global social and environmental standard-setting. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210138796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove, V., & Böhmelt, T. (2016). Does immigration induce terrorism? The Journal of Politics, 78(2), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/684679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R. J. (2018). The climate lobby: A sectoral analysis of lobbying spending on climate change in the USA, 2000 to 2016. Climatic Change, 149(3-4), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2241-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A. (2013). Issues, preferences and ties. Determinants of interest groups’ preference attainment in the EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.726467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P., & Linton, A. (2002). The Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movement Organizations on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical ConcernsThe Impact of Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Social Movements on Public Policy: Some Recent Evidence and Theoretical Concern. Social Forces, 81(2), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadoret, I., & Padovano, F. (2016). The political drivers of renewable energies policies. Energy Economics, 56, 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., & Ward, H. (2017). Transnational climate governance networks and Domestic regulatory action. International Interactions, 43(1), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1220162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, A., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). How do competing interest groups influence environmental policy? The case of renewable electricity in industrialized democracies, 1989-2007. Political Studies, 61(4), 874–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, E. S. (1997). The people's lobby: Organizational innovation and the rise of interest group politics in the United States, 1890-1925. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, J. D., Green, J. F., & Hale, T. N. (2020). Asset revaluation and the existential politics of climate change. International Organization, 75(2), 586–610. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Lindberg, S. I., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Andersson, F., Bernhard, M., Steven Fish, M., Glynn, A., Hicken, A., Knutsen, C. H., Marquardt, K. L., McMann, K., Mechkova, V., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Saxer, L., Seim, B., … Staton, J. (2017). Varieties of Democracy Database. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, C., Keefer, P., & Scartascini, C. (2016). Database of Political Institutions (DPI). Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruycker, I. (2020). Interests groups framing. In Harris P., Bitoni A., Fleisher C., & Skorkjær Binderkrantz A. (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs (pp. 1–8). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_41-1
   Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. K., Hagemann, M., Höhne, N., & Upadhyaya, P. (2013). Developments in national climate change mitigation legislation and strategy. Climate Policy, 13(6), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.845409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In J. S. Dryzek (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 144–160). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. (2008). Measuring interest group influence in the EU. West European Politics, 9(4), 559–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116508095151
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., Bernhagen, P., & Marshall, D. (2015). Interest group success in the European union. Comparative Political Studies, 48(8), 951–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014565890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2016). Insiders versus outsiders: Interest group politics in multilevel Europe. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Gennaioli, C., & Collins, M. (2015a). The political economy of passing climate change legislation: Evidence from a survey. Global Environmental Change, 35, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Gennaioli, C., & Collins, M. (2015b). Do international factors influence the passage of climate change legislation? Climate Policy, 16(3), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.1000814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. R. (2006). Bringing the material back In: Understanding the U.S. Position on climate change. Sociological Forum, 21 (3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-006-9026-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2007). Legislative organization and pollution taxation. Public Choice, 131(1-2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9114-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., Vollebergh, H. R. J., & Dijkgraaf, E. (2004). Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: Theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garmann, S. (2014). Do government ideology and fragmentation matter for reducing CO2-emissions? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 105, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgallis, P., Dowell, G., & Durand, R. (2019). Shine on Me: Industry coherence and policy support for emerging industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(3), 503–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218771550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, K. S., & Polo, S. M. T. (2016). Ethnic inclusion, democracy, and terrorism. Public Choice, 169(3-4), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0360-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, and Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.. (2017). Climate Change Laws of the World database. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/Legislation (Accessed May 9, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1996). Environmental limits on the diversity of state interest organization systems: A population ecology interpretation. Political Research Quarterly, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299604900106
   Google Scholar
• Grömping, M. (2019). More bang for the buck: Media freedom and organizational strategies in the agenda-setting of human rights groups. Political Communication, 36(3), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1551256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gründinger, W. (2017). Drivers of energy transition. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A. T. (2008). Lobbying friends and foes in climate policy: The case of business and environmental interest groups in the European union. Energy Policy, 36(8), 2964–2972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A. T. (2013). Pressure or information? Lobbying for binding renewable energy targets in the European union. Review of Policy Research, 30(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention: The divisive politics of climate change. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., Braun, C., De Bièvre, D., & Beyers, J. (2015). The domestic and global origins of transnational advocacy: Explaining lobbying presence during WTO ministerial conferences. Comparative Political Studies, 48(12), 1591–1621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015591363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., & Poletti, A. (2018). The stakeholder model paradox: How the globalisation of politics fuels domestic advocacy. Review of International Studies, 44(2), 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, L., & Lipscy, P. Y. (2013). The politics of energy. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072211-143240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, L., & Urpelainen, J. (2015). Interests, institutions, and climate policy: Explaining the choice of policy instruments for the energy sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). (2016). Energy, climate change and environment: 2016 insights. IEA - International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (2012). Green growth: Economic theory and political discourse.” Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. Working Paper, 92.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802055576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing policies that intentionally stick: Policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9201-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W. M., & Rasmussen, A. (2019). Framing by the flock: Collective issue definition and advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 52(4), 483–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018784044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy Networks in International politics. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E.-S. (2016). The politics of climate change policy design in korea. Environmental Politics, 25(3), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1104804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. E., Urpelainen, J., & Yang, J. (2016). Electric utilities and American climate policy: Lobbying by expected winners and losers. Journal of Public Policy, 36(2), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X15000033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2013). Lobbying in the European union: Interest groups, lobbying coalitions, and policy change. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., & Paterson, M. (2013). Drivers of national climate policy. Climate Policy, 13(5), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.811333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world's political-economic systems. Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. (2013). Lobbying influence: Meaning, measurement and missing. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2012.20
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., Poppelaars, C., & Berkhout, J. (2008). The European union interest system in comparative perspective: A bridge too far? West European Politics, 31(6), 1231–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802372670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000608
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2015). Partners in advocacy: Lobbyists and government officials in Washington. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1086/678389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markussen, P., & Svendsen, G. T. (2005). Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European union. Energy Policy, 33(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00238-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matisoff, D. C. (2008). The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants?. Review of Policy Research, 25(6), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J. (2015). Oppose, support, or hedge? Distributional effects, regulatory pressure, and business strategy in environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, K. C., & Rode, A. (2019). The social cost of lobbying over climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0489-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, A. (1998). Climate policy and interest groups—A public choice analysis. Intereconomics, 33(6), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02929886
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J., Olzak, S., & Soule, S. A. (2018). Going Green: Environmental Protest, Policy, and CO2Emissions in U.S. States, 1990–2007Going Green: Environmental Protest, Policy, and CO 2 Emissions in U.S. States, 1990–2007. Sociological Forum, 33(2), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12422
   Google Scholar
• Murdie, A., & Urpelainen, J. (2015). Why pick on Us? Environmental INGOs and state shaming as a strategic substitute. Political Studies, 63(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachmany, M., Fankhauser, S., Setzer, J., & Averchenkova, A. (2017). Global trends in climate change legislation and litigation: 2017 Update.” Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Nordang-Uhre, A. (2014). Exploring the diversity of transnational actors in global environmental governance. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.13
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Kelly, C. R. (2008). Eu leadership in international climate policy: Achievements and challenges. The International Spectator, 43(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720802280594
   Google Scholar
• Olzak, S., & Soule, S. A. (2009). Cross-Cutting influences of environmental protest and legislation. Social Forces, 88(1), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Vega, R. (2015). Transnational environmental activism in North America: Wielding soft power through knowledge sharing? Review of Policy Research, 32(1), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povitkina, M. (2018). The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1444723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., Carroll, B. J., & Lowery, D. (2014). Representatives of the public? Public opinion and interest group activity. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., Mäder, L. K., & Reher., S. (2018). With a little help from the people? The role of public opinion in advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 51(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017695334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietig, K. (2016). The power of strategy: Environmental NGO influence in International Climate negotiations. Global Governance, 22, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02202006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, K. (2021). Policy characteristics, electoral cycles, and the partisan politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 21(2), 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skodvin, T., Gullberg, A. T., & Aakre, S. (2010). Target-group influence and political feasability: the case of climate policy design in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 854–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.486991
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, L. C. (2020). Short circuiting policy: Interest groups and the battle over clean energy and climate policy. in The American states. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sühlsen, K., & Hisschemöller, M. (2014). Lobbying the ‘energiewende’. Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to promote the renewable energy business in Germany. Energy Policy, 69, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, P. (2017). Leaders and laggards: Climate policy ambition in developed states. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Schulze, K. (2015). Compliance with EU biofuel targets in south-eastern and Eastern Europe: Do interest groups matter? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 950–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15605923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truijens, D., & Hanegraaff, M. (2021). The two faces of conflict: How internal and external conflict affect interest group influence. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(12), 1909–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1821751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhre, A. N. (2014). Exploring the diversity of transnational actors in global environmental governance. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.13
   Google Scholar
• U.S. EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). (2016)., International energy outlook 2016. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2016).pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2018). World Development Indicators: WDI. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators (Accessed January 23, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, S., Matisoff, D. C., Kingsley, G. A., & Brown, M. A. (2019). Understanding renewable energy policy adoption and evolution in Europe: The impact of coercion, normative emulation, competition, and learning. Energy Research & Social Science, 51, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2014). The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 47–71. doi:10.1017/S1755773912000276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar