Is border carbon adjustment the right tool for the power sector?

References:

• Aldy, J. E., & Pizer, W. A. (August 2015). The competitiveness impacts of climate change mitigation policies, Discussion Paper 2015-73. Harvard Project on Climate Agreements.
   Google Scholar
• Branger, F., & Quirion, P. (2014). Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies. Ecological Economics, 99, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezlepetre, A., Gennaioli, C., Martin, R., Muuls, M., & Stoerk, T. (2019). Searching for carbon leaks in multinational companies, Center for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Working Paper 187.
   Google Scholar
• DTEK. (2020). Energy Market Reform in Ukraine; https://www.energy-community.org/dam/jcr:fc9ff1bc-73b6-4e8a-b19a-0db3b88e72b7/SF_DTEK_062019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Energy Community. (2020). Montenegro continues to take major steps to reduce GHG emissions as government approves cap and trade system for major emitters, https://www.energy-community.org/news/Energy-Community-News/2020/02/24.html
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019a). The European green deal, Brussels, 11.12.2019 COM(2019) 640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019b). Technical note results of the EUCO3232.5 scenario on Member States; https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/default/files/technical_note_on_the_euco3232_final_14062019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the european parliament and of the council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism, COM(2021) 564 final, Brussels, 14.07.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Fabra, N., & Reguant, M. (2014). Pass-Through of emissions costs in electricity markets. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2872–2899. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., & Fox, A. K. (2012). Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64(2)), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Fowlie, M., Petersen, C., & Reguant, M. (2021). Border carbon adjustments when carbon intensity varies across producers: Evidence from california. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111, 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211073
   Google Scholar
• Fragkos, P., Fragkiadakis, K., & Paroussos, L. (2021). Reducing the decarbonisation cost burden for EU energy-intensive industries. Energies, 14(1), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, J. (2013). Changing climate for carbon taxes. Who's afraid of the WTO?, Climate &energy paper series 2013, The German Marshall Fund of the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Hintermann, B. (2016). Pass-Through of CO2emission costs to hourly electricity prices in germany. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 3(4), 857–891. https://doi.org/10.1086/688486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor and E3G. (2021). A carbon pricing design for the Energy Community, Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Kortum, S., & Weisbach, D. (2016). Border adjustments for carbon emissions: Basic concepts and design (March 11, 2016). Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 16-09, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2789773.
   Google Scholar
• Mehling, M. A., Metcalf, G. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2018). Linking climate policies to advance global mitigation. Science, 359(Issue 6379), https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar5988
   Google Scholar
• Mezősi, A., & Szabó, L. (2016). Model based evaluation of electricity network investments in central Eastern Europe. Energy Strategy Reviews, 13-14, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezősi, A., Szabó, L., & Pató, Z. (2020). Extended ETS outperforms carbon border adjustment in the power sector, Euractiv, 18.08.2020., https://www.euractiv.com/section/emissions-trading-scheme/opinion/extended-ets-outperforms-carbon-border-adjustment-in-the-power-sector/
   Google Scholar
• Naegele, H., & Zaklan, A. (2019). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1339–1370. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). The Climate challenge and trade: Would border carbon adjustments accelerate or hinder climate action?, Background paper for the 39th round table on sustainable development, 25 February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Panezi, M. (2015). When CO2 goes to Geneva: Taxing carbon across borders — without violating WTO obligations. CIGI Paper No. 83.
   Google Scholar
• Pauer, S. U. (2018). Including electricity imports in california’s cap-and-trade program: A case study of a border carbon adjustment in practice. The Electricity Journal, 31(10), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2018.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandbag. (2019). The A-B-C of BCAs: An overview of the issues around introducing Border Carbon Adjustments in the EU, https://ember-climate.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019-SB-Border-Adjustments_DIGI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sandbag. (2020). The path of least resistance: How electricity generated from coal is leaking into the EU; https://ember-climate.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Ember-Path-of-least-resistance-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stavins, R. N., & Jaffe, J. (2007). Linking tradable permit systems for greenhouse Gas emissions: Opportunities, implications, and challenges. International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Tuerk – Mehling, M., Flachsland, C., & Obergassel, W. (2009). Linking carbon markets: Concepts, case studies and pathways. Climate Policy, 9(4), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verde, S., Galdi, G., Borghesi, S., Füssler, J., Jamieson, T., Wimberger, E., & Zhou, L. (2020). Emissions trading systems with different levels of environmental ambition: Implications for linking, report for the carbon market policy dialogue. European University Institute, https://doi.org/10.2870/801301
   Google Scholar
• Verde, S. F., Teixidó, J., Marcantonini, C., & Labandeira, X. (2019). Free allocation rules in the EU emissions trading system: What does the empirical literature show? Climate Policy, 19(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1549969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WTO. (2013). Appellate body report, Canada – Certain measures affecting the renewable energy generation sector/Canada – Measures relating to the feed-In tariff program, WT/DS412/AB/R/WT/DS426/AB/R, 24 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zachmann, G., & McWilliams, B. (2020). A European carbon border tax: much pain, little gain, Bruegel Policy Contribution, Issue no.6 March 2020.
   Google Scholar