Developing regional voluntary carbon markets for peatlands: innovation processes and influencing factors

References

• Adu-Baffour, F., Daum, T., & Birner, R. (2021). Governance challenges of small-scale gold mining in Ghana: Insights from a process net-map study. Land Use Policy, 102, 105271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S., & Mehmood, A. (2015). Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places. Local Environment, 20(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.842964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthelmes, A. (2018). Reporting greenhouse gas emissions from organic soils in the European Union: challenges and opportunities. Policy brief. Proceedings of the Greifswald Mire Centre 02/2018. https://greifswaldmoor.de/files/dokumente/GMC%20Schriften/18-02_Barthelmes_GMC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BEPA. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-european-union_en
   Google Scholar
• Birkenberg, A., & Birner, R. (2018). The world’s first carbon neutral coffee: Lessons on certification and innovation from a pioneer case in Costa Rica. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, R., Cullen, K., Fay, B., Hale, T., Lang, J., Mahmood, S., & Smith, S. M. (2021). Taking Stock: A global assessment of net zero targets, Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit and Oxford Net Zero. https://ca1-eci.edcdn.com/reports/ECIU-Oxford_Taking_Stock.pdf?mtime=20210323005817&focal=none
   Google Scholar
• Bonn, A., Reed, M. S., Evans, C. D., Joosten, H., Bain, C., Farmer, J., Emmer, I., Couwenberg, J., Moxey, A., Artz, R., Tanneberger, F., von Unger, M., Smyth, M.-A., & Birnie, D. (2014). Investing in nature: Developing ecosystem service markets for Peatland restoration. Ecosystem Services, 9, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böttcher, H., Gores, S., Hennenberg, K., Reise, J., & Graf, A. (2022). Analysis of the European Commission proposal for revising the EU LULUCF Regulation. https://www.oeko.de/fileadmin/oekodoc/Assumptions_LULUCF_Proposal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butzin, A., & Terstriep, J. (2018). Actors and roles in social innovation. Atlas of social innovation–new practices for a better future. TU Dortmund University.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Loft, L., & Matzdorf, B. (forthcoming). Lost in action: Climate friendly use of European peatlands needs coherence and incentive based policies. Under review in Environmental Science & Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Matzdorf, B., Zhen, L., & Schröter, B. (2020). Social-network analysis of local governance models for China’s eco-compensation program. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, F. J., & Rotmans, J. (2018). A proposed theoretical framework for actors in transformative change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deiglmeier, K., Miller, D. T., & Phills, J. A., Jr. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47
   Google Scholar
• Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P., Otter, N., Antikainen, R., Leskinen, P., Pitkänen, K., Saikku, L., Loiseau, E., & Thomsen, M. (2016). Steering innovations towards a green economy: Understanding government intervention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2018/841 as regards the scope, simplifying the compliance rules, setting out the targets of the Member States for 2030 and committing to the collective achievement of climate neutrality by 2035 in the land use, forestry and agriculture sector, and (EU) 2018/1999 as regards improvement in monitoring, reporting, tracking of progress and review. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/revision-regulation-ghg-land-use-forestry_with-annex_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. D., Peacock, M., Baird, A. J., Artz, R. R. E., Burden, A., Callaghan, N., Chapman, P. J., Cooper, H. M., Coyle, M., Craig, E., Cumming, A., Dixon, S., Gauci, V., Grayson, R. P., Helfter, C., Heppell, C. M., Holden, J., Jones, D. L., Kaduk, J., … Morrison, R. (2021). Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature, 593(7860), 548–552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03523-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J., Carlisle, K., Dickson-Swift, V., Teasdale, S., Kenny, A., Taylor, J., Croker, F., Marini, K., & Gussy, M. (2018). Applying social innovation theory to examine how community co-designed health services develop: Using a case study approach and mixed methods. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearnehough, H., Kachi, A., Mooldijk, S., Warnecke, C., & Schneider, L. (2020). Future role for voluntary carbon markets in the Paris era. German Environment Agency. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/5750/publikationen/2020_11_19_cc_44_2020_carbon_markets_paris_era_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, L.-B., & Newig, J. (2016). Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: A systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability, 8(5), 476. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/5/476; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, N., & Wiek, A. (2014). Learning from success—toward evidence-informed sustainability transitions in communities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12, 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, C., Geurts, J., Weideveld, S., Temmink, R., Bosma, N., Wichern, F., Smolders, A., & Lamers, L. (2017). Meten is weten bij bodemdaling-mitigatie. Effect van peilbeheer en teeltkeuze op CO2-emissies en veenoxidatie. Bodem, 2, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.791066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gather, C., & Niederhafner, S. (2018). Future of the voluntary carbon markets in the light of the Paris Agreement: Perspectives for soil carbon projects. German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the German Environment Agency. https://www.dehst.de/SharedDocs/downloads/EN/project-mechanisms/moorstandards_studie.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
   Google Scholar
• Glenk, K., & Martin-Ortega, J. (2018). The economics of peatland restoration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2018.1434562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, A., Barthelmes, A., Huth, V., Joosten, H., Jurasinski, G., Koebsch, F., & Couwenberg, J. (2020). Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming despite methane emissions. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15499-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, A., Böther, S., Couwenberg, J., Hüttel, S., & Jurasinski, G. (2018). Profitability of direct greenhouse gas measurements in carbon credit schemes of peatland rewetting. Ecological Economics, 146, 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 868–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck, J., Omann, I., Thronicker, I., Spekkink, W., Díaz Ayude, A., Maricchiolo, F., Mock, M., Quist, J., & Pandur, V. (2020). Understanding actor roles in sustainability initiatives: an exploratory study in five European countries. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-66850-6
   Google Scholar
• Humpenöder, F., Karstens, K., Lotze-Campen, H., Leifeld, J., Menichetti, L., Barthelmes, A., & Popp, A. (2020). Peatland protection and restoration are key for climate change mitigation. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 104093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abae2a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2020). Climate change and land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/29261/IPCCLand.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. (2021). Peatland and climate change, International Union for Conservation of Nature. https://www.iucn.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/iucn_issues_brief_peatlands_and_climate_change_final_nov21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ivleva, D., Nett, K., Treutwein, R., & Wolters, S. (2015). Domestic carbon initiatives in Europe: Experiences and opportunities. German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the German Environment Agency. https://www.dehst.de/SharedDocs/downloads/EN/project-mechanisms/Workshop_Domestic-Carbon-Initiatives.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
   Google Scholar
• Joosten, H., Brust, K., Couwenberg, J., Gerner, A., Holsten, B., Permien, T., Schäfer, A., Tanneberger, F., Trepel, M., & Wahren, A. (2015). MoorFutures®: integration of additional ecosystem services (including biodiversity) into carbon credits-standard, methodology and transferability to other regions. Bundesamt für Naturschutz (German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation).
   Google Scholar
• Joosten, H., Tanneberger, F., & Moen, A. (2017). Mires and peatlands of Europe. Schweizerbart Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Katharima, N., & Stephan, W. (2017). Leveraging domestic offset projects for a climate-neutral world: Regulatory conditions and options. German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the German Environment Agency. https://www.dehst.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/projektmechanismen/Leveraging_domestic_offsets.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. WWF Germany, 1–23. https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/vcm_report_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S., & Matzdorf, B. (2019). The intention of companies to invest in biodiversity and ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace. Ecosystem Services, 40, 101026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreibich, N., & Hermwille, L. (2021). Caught in between: Credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020. Climate Policy, 21(7), 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreibich, N., & Obergassel, W. (2019). The voluntary carbon market: What may be its future role and potential contributions to ambition raising? German Emissions Trading Authority (DEHSt) at the German Environment Agency. https://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/7396/file/7396_Carbon_Market.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kreyling, J., Tanneberger, F., Jansen, F., van der Linden, S., Aggenbach, C., Blüml, V., Couwenberg, J., Emsens, W. J., Joosten, H., Klimkowska, A., Kotowski, W., Kozub, L., Lennartz, B., Liczner, Y., Liu, H., Michaelis, D., Oehmke, C., Parakenings, K., Pleyl, E., … Jurasinski, G. (2021). Rewetting does not return drained fen peatlands to their old selves. Nature Communications, 12(1), 5693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25619-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruijf, J. V.-d., Verbrugge, L., Schröter, B., den Haan, R.-J., Cortes Arevalo, J., Fliervoet, J., Henze, J., & Albert, C. (2022). Knowledge co-production and researcher roles in transdisciplinary environmental management projects. Sustainable Development, 30(2), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S., Blum, M., & Leipold, S. (2019). What future for the voluntary carbon offset market after Paris? An explorative study based on the discursive agency approach. Climate Policy, 19(4), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1556152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, J., & Menichetti, L. (2018). The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03406-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft, L., Schleyer, C., Klingler, M., Kister, J., Zoll, F., Stegmaier, P., Aukes, E., Sorge, S., & Mann, C. (2022). The development of governance innovations for the sustainable provision of forest ecosystem services in Europe: A comparative analysis of four pilot innovation processes. Ecosystem Services, 58, 101481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milley, P., Szijarto, B., Svensson, K., & Cousins, J. B. (2018). The evaluation of social innovation: A review and integration of the current empirical knowledge base. Evaluation, 24(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018763242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxey, A., Smyth, M.-A., Taylor, E., & Williams, A. P. (2021). Barriers and opportunities facing the UK Peatland Code: A case-study of blended green finance. Land Use Policy, 108, 105594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation (Vol. 24). Nesta London.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. K. (2020). Uptake of peatland ecosystem service knowledge for decision-making. Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Oeij, P. R. A., van der Torre, W., Vaas, F., & Dhondt, S. (2019). Understanding social innovation as an innovation process: Applying the innovation journey model. Journal of Business Research, 101, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen, K., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Aissani, L., Hansjürgens, B., Kuikman, P. J., Leskinen, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). What can be learned from practical cases of green economy? –studies from five European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 666–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Allen, K., Attlee, A., Dougill, A. J., Evans, K. L., Kenter, J. O., Hoy, J., McNab, D., Stead, S. M., Twyman, C., Scott, A. S., Smyth, M. A., Stringer, L. C., & Whittingham, M. J. (2017). A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 43, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Bonn, A., Evans, C., Glenk, K., & Hansjürgens, B. (2014). Assessing and valuing peatland ecosystem services for sustainable management. Ecosystem Services, 9, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Curtis, T., Gosal, A., Kendall, H., Andersen, S. P., Ziv, G., Attlee, A., Fitton, R. G., Hay, M., Gibson, A. C., Hume, A. C., Hill, D., Mansfield, J. L., Martino, S., Olesen, A. S., Prior, S., Rodgers, C., Rudman, H., & Tanneberger, F. (2022). Integrating ecosystem markets to co-ordinate landscape-scale public benefits from nature. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0258334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattler, C. (2022). Using process Net-Map to analyze governance innovations in the forestry sector. Ecosystem Services, 55, 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schartinger, D., Wepner, B., Andersson, T., Abbas, Q., Asenova, D., Damianova, Z., Dimova, A., Ariton, V., Hannum, C., & Eker, S. (2017). Social innovation in environment and climate change: summary report. https://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SI-DRIVE-D6_4-Final-Policy-Field-Report-Environment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, E. (2007). Process Net-Map https://netmap.wordpress.com/process-net-map/
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, E., & Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: Collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods, 22(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10374798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, L., Kollmuss, A., & Lazarus, M. (2015). Addressing the risk of double counting emission reductions under the UNFCCC. Climatic Change, 131(4), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1398-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science Communication Unit, University of the West of England. (2014). Science for environment policy in-depth report: Social innovation and the environment. http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
   Google Scholar
• Simola, H., Pitkänen, A., & Turunen, J. (2012). Carbon loss in drained forestry peatlands in Finland, estimated by re-sampling peatlands surveyed in the 1980s. European Journal of Soil Science, 63(6), 798–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanneberger, F., Appulo, L., Ewert, S., Lakner, S., Ó Brolcháin, N., Peters, J., & Wichtmann, W. (2021). The power of nature-based solutions: How peatlands Can help Us to achieve Key EU sustainability objectives. Advanced Sustainable Systems, 5(1), 2000146. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanneberger, F., & Wichtmann, W. (2011). Carbon credits from peatland rewetting-climate-biodiversity-land use. Schweizerbart Science Publishers. https://www.schweizerbart.de/publications/detail/isbn/9783510652716/Carbon_
   Google Scholar
• Tiemeyer, B., Freibauer, A., Borraz, E. A., Augustin, J., Bechtold, M., Beetz, S., Beyer, C., Ebli, M., Eickenscheidt, T., Fiedler, S., Förster, C., Gensior, A., Giebels, M., Glatzel, S., Heinichen, J., Hoffmann, M., Höper, H., Jurasinski, G., Laggner, A., … Drösler, M. (2020). A new methodology for organic soils in national greenhouse gas inventories: Data synthesis, derivation and application. Ecological Indicators, 109, 105838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSVCM. (2021). Phase II report of taskforce on scaling voluntary carbon markets. https://www.iif.com/Portals/1/Files/TSVCM_Phase_2_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2021). Economics of peatlands conservation, restoration, and sustainable management – a policy report for the global peatlands initiative. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/10.500.11822/37262/PeatCRSM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015). The Paris agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (2017). The innovation journey: You can’t control it, but you can learn to maneuver it. Innovation, 19(1), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1256780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Unger, M., Emmer, I., Joosten, H., & Couwenberg, J. (2019). Designing an international peatland carbon standard: Criteria, best practices and opportunities. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/2019-11-28_cc-42-2019_sca_peatland_standards_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wichmann, S. (2018). Economic incentives for climate smart agriculture on peatlands in the EU. https://greifswaldmoor.de/files/dokumente/GMC20Schriften/Report_Economic20incentives_Cinderella_GMC%20Proceedings_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., van Steenbergen, F., & Loorbach, D. (2017). Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar