Shipping in the EU emissions trading system: implications for mitigation, costs and modal split

References

• Adland, R., Cariou, P., & Wolff, F.-C. (2018). Does energy efficiency affect ship values in the second-hand market? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111, 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, D., & Styhre, L. (2021). Transportinköpspanelen – urval av enkätresultat (The Transport Purchasing Panel - a selection of survey results), Chalmers University of Technology, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, https://www.chalmers.se/sv/centrum/northern-lead/transportinkopspanelen/
   Google Scholar
• Babicz, J. (2015). Wärtsilä Encyclopedia of ship technology (2nd ed.). https://www.wartsila.com/docs/default-source/marine-documents/encyclopedia/wartsila-o-marine-encyclopedia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balcombe, P., Brierley, J., Lewis, C., Skatvedt, L., Speirs, J., Hawkes, A., & Staffell, I. (2019). How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltic Exchange. (2023). Baltic Dry Index (BADI). Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://www.balticexchange.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bergantino, A. S., Bierlaire, M., Catalano, M., Migliore, M., & Amoroso, S. (2013). Taste heterogeneity and latent preferences in the choice behaviour of freight transport operators. Transport Policy, 30, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynolf, S., Baldi, F., & Johnson, H. (2016). Energy efficiency and fuel changes to reduce environmental impacts. In K. Andersson, S. Brynolf, J. F. Lindgren, & M. Wilewska-Bien (Eds.), Shipping and the Environment - Improving environmental performance in marine transportation (pp. 295–339). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brynolf, S., Hansson, J., Anderson, J. E., Ridjan Skov, I., Wallington, T. J., Grahn, M., Korberg, A. D., Malmgren E., Taljegård, M. (2022). Review of electrofuel feasibility—prospects for road, ocean, and air transport. Progress in Energy, 4(4), 042007; https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/ac8097.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., & Cullinane, K. (2023). The prospects for, and implications of, emissions trading in shipping. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., Dalaklis, D., Ölçer, A. I., & Ghaforian Masodzadeh, P. (2021). Inclusion of shipping in the EU-ETS: Assessing the direct costs for the maritime sector using the MRV data. Energies, 14(13), 3915. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., Raza, Z., & Woxenius, J. (2019). The integration of RoRo shipping in sustainable intermodal transport chains: The case of a North European RoRo service. Sustainability, 11(8), 2422. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, A., & Woxenius, J. (2020). Chapter 9: Short-distance maritime geographies: short sea shipping, RoRo, feeder and inter-island transport. In G. Wilmsmeier & J. Monios (Eds.), Geographies of maritime transport (pp. 134–148). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chryssakis, C., Brinks, H. W., Brunelli, A. C., Fuglseth, T. P., Lande, M., Laugen, L., Longva, T., Raeissi, B., & Tvete, H. A. (2017). Low carbon shipping towards 2050. Technical Report. DNVGL; 2017. Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://www.dnvgl.com/publications/low-carbonshipping-towards-2050-93579
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. (2020). Maritime forecast to 2050, Energy Transition Outlook 2020.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2015). EU ETS Handbook, European Union. Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://climate.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2017-03/ets_handbook_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2018). DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/410 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 14 March 2018 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, and Decision (EU) 2015/1814.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2020a). Inception impact assessment. Ref. Ares (2020) 6081850 −29/10/2020.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2020b). COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Full-length report Accompanying the document Report from the Commission 2019 Annual Report on CO2 Emissions from Maritime Transport {C(2020) 3184 final}.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2021). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and Regulation (EU) 2015/757. COM(2021) 551 final. Brussels, 14.7.2021.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2023). COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/2297 of 26 October 2023 identifying neighbouring container transhipment ports pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, M.S., Longva, T., Hoffmann, P., Endresen, Ø., & Dalsøren, S.B. (2011). Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions. Maritime Policy Management, 38, 11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMSA. (2022). CO2 Emission Report. THETIS-MRV data. Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://mrv.emsa.europa.eu/#public/emission-report
   Google Scholar
• EP and EUCO. (2021). Fuel EU Maritime proposal: Regulation of the European parliament and of the council on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport and amending Directive 2009/16/EC, (COM(2021) 562 final).
   Google Scholar
• EP and EUCO. (2023a). DIRECTIVE (EU) 2023/959 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 10 May 2023 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union and Decision (EU) 2015/1814 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading system. Official Journal of the European Union 16.5.2023 L130/134.
   Google Scholar
• EP and EUCO. (2023b). Regulation (EU) 2023/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC.
   Google Scholar
• EP and EUCO. (2023c). Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652.
   Google Scholar
• EP and EUCO. (2023d). Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure, and repealing Directive 2014/94/EU (Text with EEA relevance).
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2023). Trends and projections in Europe 2023. EEA Report 07/2023. Downloaded 23 November 2023 from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/trends-and-projections-in-europe-2023
   Google Scholar
• Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Zhang, S., Pereda, P., Comer, B., Hauerhof, E., van der Loeff, W. S., Smith, T., Zhang, Y., Kosaka, H., Adachi, M., Bonello, J.-M., Galbraith, C., Gong, Z., Hirata, K., Hummels, D., Kleijn, A., Lee, D. S., Liu, Y., … Xing, H. (2021). Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020—Final Report. Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/Environment/Pages/Fourth-IMO-Greenhouse-Gas-Study-2020.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Faber, J., Markowska, A., Eyring, V., Cionni, I., & Selstad, E. (2010). A global maritime emissions trading system. design and impacts on the shipping sector, countries and regions.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, J., Markowska, A., Nelissen, D., Davidson, M., Eyring, V., Cionni, I., Selstad, E., Kågeson, P., Lee, D., Buhaug, Ø, & Lindstad, H. (2009). Technical support for European action to reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from international maritime transport.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, J., Nelissen, D., Hon, G., Wang, H., & Tsimplis, M. (2012). Regulated slow steaming in maritime transport – An assessment of options, costs and benefits. CE Delft, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Feo, M., Espino, R., & García, L. (2011). An stated preference analysis of Spanish freight forwarders modal choice on the south-west Europe Motorway of the Sea. Transport Policy, 18(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flodén, J., Bärthel, F., & Sorkina, E. (2017). Transport buyers choice of transport service – A literature review of empirical results. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 23, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goicoechea, N., & Abadie, L.M. (2021). Optimal slow steaming speed for container ships under the EU Emission Trading System. Energies, 14(22), 7487. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Aregall, M. (2018). Description of the Gothenburg container port conflict and its logistics consequences. University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law. https://gup.ub.gu.se/file/207467
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., Wallace, S., & Wang, X. (2019). Can an Emission Trading Scheme really reduce CO2 emissions in the short term? Evidence from a maritime fleet composition and deployment model. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 74, 318–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilbault, M., & Cruz, C. (2010). Shippers’ mode choices and logistics constraints. 12th wctr, world conference on transport research, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Hermeling, C., Klement, J. H., Koesler, S., Köhler, J., & Klement, D. (2015). Sailing into a dilemma: An economic and legal analysis of an EU trading scheme for maritime emissions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, J., Nikopoulou, Z., Ramstedt, L., & Woxenius, J. (2014). Modelling modal choice effects of regulation on low-sulphur marine fuels in Northern Europe. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jivén, K., Lammgård, C., Woxenius, J., & Fridell, E. (2020). Consequences of speed reductions for ships – An impact study for shipping companies and Swedish business. Available at: https://lighthouse.nu/sv/publikationer/lighthouse-rapporter
   Google Scholar
• Kågeson, P. (2007). Linking CO2 emissions from international shipping to the EU ETS. A report commissioned by the federal environment agency, Germany, 2 July 2007. Retrieved from: http://www.natureassociates.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Linking-CO2-Emissions-from-International-Shipping-to-the-EU-ETS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kanchiralla, F. M., Brynolf, S., Olsson, T., Ellis, J., Hansson, J., & Grahn, M. (2023). How do variations in ship operation impact the techno-economic feasibility and environmental performance of fossil-free fuels? A life cycle study. Applied Energy, 350, 121773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehoe, J., Nikopoulou, Z., Liddane, M., Ramstedt, L., & Koliousis, I. G. (2010). Impact study of the future requirements of annex VI of the MARPOL convention on short Sea shipping: Task 1 report. SKEMA Consolidation Study.
   Google Scholar
• Korberg, A. D., Brynolf, S., Grahn, M., & Skov, I. R. (2021). Techno-economic assessment of advanced fuels and propulsion systems in future fossil-free ships. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, 110861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagouvardou, S., Lagemann, B., Psaraftis, H. N., Lindstad, E., & Erikstad, S. O. (2023). Marginal abatement cost of alternative marine fuels and the role of market-based measures. Nature Energy, 8(11), 1209–1220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01334-4
   Google Scholar
• Lagouvardou, S., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2022). Implications of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) on European container routes: A carbon leakage case study. Maritime Transport Research, 3, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2022.100059
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd’s Register and UMAS. (2017). Zero emissions vessels 2030 – How do we get there? Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://www.lr.org/en/insights/global-marine-trends-2030/zero-emission-vessels-2030/
   Google Scholar
• Mellin, A., Elkerbout, M., Hansson, J., Zetterberg, L., Fridell, E., Christodoulou, A., & Woxenius, J. (2020). Including maritime transport in the EU Emission Trading System – addressing design and impacts. Gothenburg: Lighthouse reports. https://lighthouse.nu/sv/publikationer/lighthouse-rapporter/including-maritime-transport-in-the-eu-emission-trading-system-addressing-design-and-impacts
   Google Scholar
• Monios, J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2020). Deep adaptation to climate change in the maritime transport sector – A new paradigm for maritime economics? Maritime Policy & Management, 47(7), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1752947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRV. (2023). THETIS-MRV database, EMSA, European Maritime Safety Agency. https://mrv.emsa.europa.eu/#public/emission-report
   Google Scholar
• Nepomuceno de Oliveira, M. A., Szklo, A., & Castelo Branco, D. A. (2022). Implementation of maritime transport mitigation measures according to their marginal abatement costs and their mitigation potentials. Energy Policy, 160, 112699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. (2011). The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-010-0001-7
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Effective Carbon Rates. Pricing CO₂ through Taxes and emissions trading systems. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, O. (2017). An overview of feeder services in the Era of mega containerships. In L. Saglietto & C. Cezanne (Eds.), Global intermediation and logistics service providers (pp. 317–339). IGI global.
   Google Scholar
• Psaraftis, H. N., Zis, T., & Lagouvardou, S. (2021). A comparative evaluation of market based measures for shipping decarbonization. Maritime Transport Research, 2, 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100019
   Google Scholar
• Raza, Z., Svanberg, M., & Wiegmans, B. (2020). Modal shift from road haulage to short sea shipping: a systematic literature review and research directions. Transport Reviews, 40(3), 382–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1714789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, Z., & Woxenius, J. (2023). Customer-driven sustainable business practices and their relationships with environmental and business performance - insights from the European shipping industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 6138–66153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3477.
   Google Scholar
• Repka, S., & Pöntynen, R. (2023). Rederibarometern 2022, report B219, publications of The centre For maritime studies brahea centre at The University Of Turku, Turku, Finland, https://www.utu.fi/sites/default/files/media/MKK/Julkaisut/B219_Varustamobarometri-Rederibarometern-2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rojon, I., Lazarou, N. J., Rehmatulla, N., & Smith, T. (2021). The impacts of carbon pricing on maritime transport costs and their implications for developing economies. Marine Policy, 132, 104653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., Rafaty, R., Calel, R., & Grubb, M. (2022). Allocation, allocation, allocation! The political economy of the development of the European Union Emissions Trading System. WIRES Climate Change, 13(5), e796. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.796
   Google Scholar
• SBT. (2023). Scienced based target initiative. Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://sciencebasedtargets.org/,
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H., Gustafsson, M., & Spohr, J. (2020). Emission abatement in shipping – is it possible to reduce carbon dioxide emissions profitably? Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ship & Bunker. (2023). Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://shipandbunker.com/prices
   Google Scholar
• Stena Line. (2022). Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://www.stenaline.com/media/stories/stena-germanica-refuels-with-recycled-methanol-from-residual-steel-gases/
   Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics (3rd ed.). Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Trading Economics. (2023). EU Carbon Permits. Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/carbon
   Google Scholar
• Transport & Environment. (2021). Cost-benefit Analysis of policy evasion under a future maritime ETS. https://www.transportenvironment.org/sites/te/files/publications/ETS_shipping_study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Transport & Environment. (2022). Climate impacts of exemptions to EU’s shipping proposals. Report. www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Climate_Impacts_of_Shipping_Exemptions_Report-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2023). Review of maritime transport 2023, Unctad – united nations conference on trade and development, New York and Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Vierth, I., Ek, K., From, E., & Lind, J. (2023). The cost impacts of Fit for 55 on shipping and their implications for Swedish freight transport, Working Papers, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute, diva2:1731156
   Google Scholar
• Viktorelius, M., Varvne, H., & von Knorring, H. (2022). An overview of sociotechnical research on maritime energy efficiency. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 21(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-022-00263-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallenius Marine. (2022). Retrieved December 17, 2023, from https://www.walleniusmarine.com/our-services/ship-design-newbuilding/ship-design/wind-powered-vessels/
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Z., el Makhloufi, A., Chen, Y., & Tang, J. (2018). Decarbonizing the international shipping industry: Solutions and policy recommendations. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 126, 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Fu, X., & Luo, M. (2015). Modeling the impacts of alternative emission trading schemes on international shipping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Zhen, L., Psaraftis, H., & Yan, R. (2021). Implications of the EU’s inclusion of maritime transport in the emissions trading system for shipping companies. Engineering, 7(5), 554–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettestad, J., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2022). On the process of including shipping in EU emissions trading. Multi-Level Reinforcement Revisited. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 246–255.
   Google Scholar
• Winnes, H., Fridell, E., Ntziachristos, L., Grigoriadis, A., & Jalkanen, J.-P. (2020). Evaluation, control and Mitigation of the EnviRonmental impacts of shippinG Emissions (EMERGE) - Summary and analysis of available abatement methods for SOx, NOx and PM, together with data on emissions, waste Streams, Costs and applicability.
   Google Scholar
• Woxenius, J., & Bergqvist, R. (2011). Comparing maritime containers and semi-trailers in the context of hinterland transport by rail. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., Hui Ng, S., & Sut Sou, W. (2016). Uncertainty quantification of CO2 emission reduction for maritime shipping. Energy Policy, 88, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetterberg, L., Rootzen, J., Mellin, A., Hansson, J., Fridell, E., Christodoulou, A., Floden, J., & Elkerbout, M. (2021). Policy brief: Shipping in the EU ETS. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, 210(60), 100. https://www.ivl.se/projektwebbar/eu-emission-trading-system.html
   Google Scholar
• Zis, T., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2017). The implications of the new sulphur limits on the European Ro-Ro sector. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zis, T., Psaraftis, & H.N. (2019). Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1468938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar