Evaluating policy coherence and integration for adaptation: the case of EU policies and Arctic cross-border climate change impacts

References

• Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of Déjà Vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMAP. (2021). Arctic climate change update 2021: Key trends and impacts. Summary for policy-makers. Tromsø: Arctic Council.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, T., Daviðsdóttir, B., Einarsson, N., & Young, O. R. (2020). The Arctic Council: An agent of change? Global Environmental Change, 63, 102099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzie, M., Carter, T. R., Carlsen, H., & Taylor, R. (2019). Cross-border climate change impacts: Implications for the European Union. Regional Environmental Change, 19(3), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1436-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzie, M., & Persson, Å. (2019). Governing borderless climate risks: moving beyond the territorial framing of adaptation. International Enviromental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19, 369–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesbroek, R. (2021). Policy integration and climate change adaptation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 52, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesbroek, R., & Candel, J. J. L. (2020). Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: Explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in The Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 53(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09354-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. (2008). Mission impossible: The European Union and policy coherence for development. Journal of European Integration, 30(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330802144992
   Google Scholar
• Carter, T. R., Benzie, M., Campiglio, E., Carlsen, H., Fronzek, S., Hildén, M., Reyer, C. P. O., & West, C. (2021). A conceptual framework for cross-border impacts of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 69, 102307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constable, A. J., Harper, S., Dawson, J., Holsman, K., Mustonen, T., Piepenburg, D., & Rost, B. (2022). Cross-chapter paper 6: Polar regions. In H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama (Eds.), Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, in: Working group II sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 2319–2368). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Alfonso. (2019). Mainstreaming of climate action in the EU budget Impact of a political objective. https://doi.org/10.2861/469
   Google Scholar
• Del Río, P. (2014). On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: The case of renewable energy support schemes. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-013-9189-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. (2019). The European green deal. (No COM(2019) 640 final) communication from the commission. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2021). Joint communication on a stronger EU engagement for a peaceful, sustainable and prosperous Arctic. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. (2022). REPowerEU: Joint European Action for more affordable, secure and sustainable energy (No. COM(2022) 108 final), Communication from the Commission. Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• European Union External Action. (2020). About the European External Action Service (EEAS) - European External Action Service [WWW Document]. Retrieved April 9, 2020, from, https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/82/about-european-external-action-service-eeas_en.
   Google Scholar
• Forbis, R., & Hayhoe, K. (2018). Does Arctic governance hold the key to achieving climate policy targets? Environmental Research Letters, 13(2), 020201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness, M., & Gänzle, S. (2017). The security-development nexus in European union foreign relations after Lisbon: Policy coherence at last? Development Policy Review, 35(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanaček, K., Kröger, M., Scheidel, A., Rojas, F., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2022). On thin ice – The Arctic commodity extraction frontier and environmental conflicts. Ecological Economics, 191, 107247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. T., & Moe, E. (2022). Renewable energy expansion or the preservation of national energy sovereignty? Norwegian renewable energy policy meets resource nationalism. Political Geography, 99, 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrinkari, T., Katila, P., & Karppinen, H. (2016). Stakeholder coalitions in forest politics: Revision of Finnish Forest Act. Forest Policy and Economics, 67, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Vince, J., & Del Río, P. (2017). Policy integration and multi-level governance: Dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs. Politics and Governance, 5(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i2.928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. (2002). Policy coherence, global environmental governance, and poverty reduction. International Environmental Agreements, 2(4), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021319804455
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Policy paper environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2017). Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P. (2022). Policy and political (in)coherence, security, and Nordic-Baltic energy transitions. Oxford Open Energy, 1, oiac009.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Mickwitz, P. (2006). The challenge of greening technologies-Environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Research Policy, 35(5), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Mickwitz, P. (2009). The Finnish environment 3 | 2 0 0 9 Making the Climate Count Climate Policy Integration and Coherence in Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Sivonen, M. H. (2021). Interplay between low-carbon energy transitions and national security: An analysis of policy integration and coherence in Estonia, Finland and Scotland. Energy Research & Social Science, 75, 102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaepen, H. (2021). Climate risks in Tunisia: Challenges to adaptation in the agri-food system. Cascades Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Koivurova, T., Hoel, A. H., Humpert, M., Kirchner, S., Raspotnik, A., Smieszek, M., & Stępień, A. (2021). Overview of EU actions in the Arctic and their impact (Final Report - June 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2017). Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability? Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. M., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lung, T., Füssel, H.-M., & Eichler, L. (2017). Europe’s vulnerability to climate change impacts outside Europe. In H.-M. Füssel, A. Jol, A. Marx, & M. Hildén (Eds.), Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016: An indicator-based report (pp. 288–293). European Environment Agency, Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2800/53480
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. (2020). Promoting policy coherence: Lessons learned in EU development cooperation policy brief | September 2020 2 lessons learned from policy coherence for development in the EU. ECDPM, Cascades Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, J., Ronceray, M., & Spierings, E. (2017). Discussion Paper Policy coherence and the 2030 Agenda: Building on the PCD experience.
   Google Scholar
• Magga, A.-M. (2024). Siidan lait: Saamelaisen poronhoidon oikeusperiaatteet ja -teoria (The law of the Siida - legal principles and theory of the Sámi reindeer herding, in Finnish). Vastapaino, Tampere (p. 262).
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., Jochim, A. E., & Sapotichne, J. (2011). Constructing homeland security: An anemic policy regime. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinander, O., Hildén, M., Lappalainen, H., Mosoni, C., Ruuhela, R., Kuntsi-Reunanen, H., Carter, T. R., Fronzek, S., Pirttioja, N., Arslan, A., Kupiainen, K., Isaksen, K., Lihavainen, H., & Aalto, J. (2022). Permafrost thaw and adapting to its multiple effects in the Arctic, In: Arctic yearbook 2022: The Russian Arctic: Economics, politics and peoples. Akureyri, Iceland (pp. 215–231).
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P. (2003). A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments: Context and key concepts. Evaluation, 9(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389003094004
   Google Scholar
• Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S., Carss, D., Ferrand, N., Görg, C., Jensen, A., Kivimaa, P., Kuhlicke, C., Kuindersma, W., Máñez, M., Melanen, M., Monni, S., Pedersen, A. B., Reinert, H., & Bommel, S. v. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. PEER Network. https://www.peer.eu/?id=128.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. (2021). Regional perspective report on the Arctic. North Atlantic Treaty Union.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Nilsson, L. J. (2005). Climate policy towards climate policy integration in the EU: Evolving dilemmas and opportunities towards climate policy integration in the EU: Evolving dilemmas and opportunities. Climate Policy, 5, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2005.9685563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Persson, Å. (2003). Framework for analysing environmental policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5, 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908032000171648
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P., & McGuinn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). A practical guide to legal and financial levers: Border cities and climate change. June 2020, revised edition. https://www.oecd.org/swac/topics/climate-change/border-cities-practical-guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbek-Clemmensen, J., & Thomasen, G. (2020). How has Arctic coastal state cooperation affected the Arctic council? Marine Policy, 122, 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantanen, M., Karpechko, A. Y., Lipponen, A., Nordling, K., Hyvärinen, O., Ruosteenoja, K., Vihma, T., & Laaksonen, A. (2022). The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3
   Google Scholar
• Remling, E. (2018). Depoliticizing adaptation: A critical analysis of EU climate adaptation policy. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1429207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringbom, H. (2017). The European Union and Arctic shipping. In N. Liu, E. A. Kirk, & T. Henriksen (Eds.), The European Union and the Arctic (pp. 239–273). JSTOR.
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., Wilk, B., Persson, Å, Uittenbroek, C., & Wamsler, C. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation: Taking stock about “what works” from empirical research worldwide. Regional Environmental Change, 18(4), 1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1259-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel, D., & Jordan, A. (2009). Joining up or pulling apart? The use of appraisal to coordinate policy making for sustainable development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(5), 1201–1216. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel, D. J., den Uyl, R. M., & de Vito, L. (2018). Understanding policy integration in the EU—Insights from a multi-level lens on climate adaptation and the EU’s coastal and marine policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 82, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunz, S., De Botselier, B., & López Piqueres, S. (2020). The European Union’s Arctic policy discourse: Green by omission. Environmental Politics, 30, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1787041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shawoo, Z., Maltais, A., Dzebo, A., & Pickering, J. (2023). Political drivers of policy coherence for sustainable development: An analytical framework. Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. C. (2012). Still punching below its weight? Coherence and effectiveness in European Union foreign policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefson, J. (2022). What the war in Ukraine means for energy, climate and food. Nature News Feature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00969-9.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (2015). The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. (1980). Integrated marine policy. What? Why? How? Marine Policy, 4, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-597X(80)90051-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urwin, K., & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (1997). Public policy and program evaluation, public policy and program evaluation. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127767
   Google Scholar
• Vinogradov, S., & Wouters, P. (2020). Adaptation regulatory regimes to address climate change challenges in transboundary water basins: Can multilateral regionalism help?. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 29(3), 406–416. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/reel.v29.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Leyen, U. (2023). Statement by president von der Leyen at the joint press conference with Norwegian prime minister støre. Secretary-General Stoltenberg and CEO Opedal.
   Google Scholar
• West, C. D., Stokeld, E., Campiglio, E., Croft, S., Detges, A., Duranovic, A., & Von Jagow, A. (2021). Europe’s cross-border trade, human security and financial connections: A climate risk perspective. Climate Risk Management, 34, 100382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, R., & Lazard, O. (2023). Climate, ecological and energy security challenges facing the EU: New and old dynamics. In T. Raynor, K. Szulecki, A. Jordan, & S. Oberthür (Eds.), Handbook on European Union climate change policy and politics (pp. 158–172). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zellen, B. S. (2023). As war in Ukraine upends a quarter century of enduring Arctic cooperation, the world needs the whole Arctic council now more than ever. Northern Review, https://doi.org/10.22584/nr54.2023.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar