How aligned are industry strategy and government policy for the decarbonization of energy-intensive process industries?

References

• Accenture. (2022). Accelerating global companies toward net zero by 2050. https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/capabilities/strategy-and-consulting/strategy/document/Accenture-Net-Zero-By-2050-Global-Report-2022.pdf#zoom=40
   Google Scholar
• Åhman, M., Nilsson, L. J., & Johansson, B. (2017). Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries. Climate Policy, 17(5), 634–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, J., & Hellsmark, H. (2022). Directionality in mission-oriented innovation systems: The case of reaching zero emissions in the Swedish process industry. 15th NESS Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, H., & Hansen, T. (2023). Flickering guiding light from the International Maritime Organisation's policy mix. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 47, 100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashmakov, I. A., Nilsson, L. J., Acquaye, A., Bataille, C., Cullen, J. M., de la Rue du Can, S., Fischedick, M., Geng, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2023). Industry. In P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. A. Khourdajie, R. V. Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, & J. Malley (Eds.), IPCC, 2022: Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.013
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, C., Åhman, M., Neuhoff, K., Nilsson, L. J., Fischedick, M., Lechtenböhmer, S., Solano-Rodriquez, B., Denis-Ryan, A., Stiebert, S., Waisman, H., Sartor, O., & Rahbar, S. (2018). A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris agreement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 960–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataille, C., Nilsson, L. J., & Jotzo, F. (2021). Industry in a net-zero emissions world: New mitigation pathways, new supply chains, modelling needs and policy implications. Energy and Climate Change, 2, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100059
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, C., Waisman, H., Colombier, M., Segafredo, L., Williams, J., & Jotzo, F. (2016). The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(sup1), S7–S26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, F., Hansen, T., & Nilsson, L. J. (2022). Assessing the feasibility of archetypal transition pathways towards carbon neutrality – A comparative analysis of European industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 106015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenschot. (2017). Electrification in the Dutch process industry.
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Hansen, T., Hanson, J., Mäkitie, T., & Steen, M. (2023). Complexity challenges for transition policy: Lessons from coastal shipping in Norway. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 46. Article 100687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.100687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, A.-K., & Söderholm, K. (2016). Sustainable energy transition: The case of the Swedish pulp and paper industry 1973–1990. Energy Efficiency, 9(5), 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9416-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burck, J., Uhlich, T., Bals, C., Höhne, N., & Nascrimiento, L. (2023). Climate Change Performance Index 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Day, T., Mooldijk, S., Hans, F., Smit, S., Posada, E., Skribbe, R., Woollands, S., Fearnehough, H., Kuramochi, T., Warnecke, C., Kachi, A., & Höhne, N. (2023). Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Essar. (2021). Essar and progressive energy join forces to deliver the UK’s first low carbon hydrogen production hub. Retrieved June 15 from https://www.essaroil.co.uk/news/essar-and-progressive-energy-join-forces-to-deliver-the-uk-s-first-low-carbon-hydrogen-production-hub/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2023). Carbon border adjustment mechanism. Retrieved Novermber 29 from https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2023). Fit for 55: Parliament adopts key laws to reach 2030 climate target. Retrieved November 29 from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230414IPR80120/fit-for-55-parliament-adopts-key-laws-to-reach-2030-climate-target
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N., Duwe, M., Iwaszuk, E., Berghmans, N., Vallejo, L., & Deprez, A. (2021). Climate governance systems in Europe: The role of national advisory bodies. Ecologic Institute & IDDRI.
   Google Scholar
• ExxonMobil. (2021). ExxonMobil, SGN, Green Investment Group sign MoU to explore potential for Southampton Hydrogen hub. Retrieved June 15 from https://www.exxonmobil.co.uk/news/newsroom/uk-news-releases/2021/1208_exxonmobil-sgn-green-investment-group-sign-mou
   Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. (2023). What actually are carbon contracts for difference? https://www.bmwk-energiewende.de/EWD/Redaktion/EN/Newsletter/2020/11/Meldung/direkt-account.html
   Google Scholar
• Federal ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection. (2021). Federal Climate Change Act. https://www.bmuv.de/en/law/federal-climate-change-act
   Google Scholar
• German Environment Agency. (2023). Indicator: Greenhouse gas emissions. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/the-uba/about-us
   Google Scholar
• Gerres, T., Chaves Ávila, J. P., Llamas, P. L., & San Román, T. G. (2019). A review of cross-sector decarbonisation potentials in the European energy intensive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the Netherlands. (no date). Climate policy. Retrieved November 26 from https://www.government.nl/topics/climate-change/climate-policy
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., & Madsen, S. (2021). Transformative innovation policy: A novel approach? In B. Godin, D. Vinck, & G. Gaglio (Eds.), Handbook of alternative theories of innovation (pp. 276–291). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789902303.00028
   Google Scholar
• Hassler, J. (2023). Sveriges klimatstrategi - 46 förslag för klimatomställningen i ljuset av Fit-For-55. Rapport till Sverige klimat- och miljöminister.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, A. (2019). Sufficiency. In A. F. Kalfagianni, & A. Hayden (Eds.), Routledge handbook of global sustainability governance (pp. 151–163). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hieminga, G., & Zhang, C. (2024). CCS growth is set to build as market struggles to kick off. ING. Retrieved March 24 from https://think.ing.com/articles/continued-growth-in-ccs-but-market-struggles-to-kick-off
   Google Scholar
• Keyßer, L. T., & Lenzen, M. (2021). 1.5 °C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22884-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkitie, T., Steen, M., Saether, E. A., Bjørgum, Ø, & Poulsen, R. T. (2022). Norwegian ship-owners’ adoption of alternative fuels. Energy Policy, 163, 112869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). Accelerating low-carbon innovation. Joule, 4(11), 2259–2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy. (2019). Long term strategy on climate mitigation.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. J., Bauer, F., Åhman, M., Andersson, F. N. G., Bataille, C., de la Rue du Can, S., Ericsson, K., Hansen, T., Johansson, B., Lechtenböhmer, S., van Sluisveld, M., & Vogl, V. (2021). An industrial policy framework for transforming energy and emissions intensive industries towards zero emissions. Climate Policy, 21(8), 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1957665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykamp, H., Andersen, A. D., & Geels, F. W. (2023). Low-carbon electrification as a multi-system transition: A socio-technical analysis of Norwegian maritime transport, construction, and chemical sectors. Environmental Research Letters, 18(9), 094059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf67a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. (2020). Netherlands Climate and Energy Outlook 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Regeringens Klimapartnerskab for Energitung Industri. (2020). Afrapportering.
   Google Scholar
• Riahi, K., Schaeffer, R., Arango, J., Calvin, K., Guivarch, C., Hasegawa, T., Jiang, K., Kriegler, E., Matthews, R., & Peters, G. P. (2022). Mitigation pathways compatible with long-term goals.
   Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., Geden, O., Cowie, A., & Reisinger, A. (2021). Net-zero emissions targets are vague: Three ways to fix. Nature, 591(7850), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs, M. A. (2020). Competing perspectives on energy transitions: a global comparison. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 30(1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-020-00214-7
   Google Scholar
• Shell. (2021). Shell strebt an, Rohölverarbeitung in Wesseling einzustellen. Retrieved June 15 from https://www.shell.de/ueber-uns/newsroom/pressemitteilungen-2021/shell-strebt-an-rohoelverarbeitung-in-wesseling-einzustellen.html
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, R. (2010). An assessment of the climate change policies and performance of large European companies. Climate Policy, 10(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2008.0591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Climate Policy Council. (2023). Klimatpolitiska rådets rapport 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Climate Policy Council. (2024). Klimatpolitiska rådets rapport 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environment Agency. (2021). Utsläpp i siffror. Retrieved September 1 from https://utslappisiffror.naturvardsverket.se/sv/Sok/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. (2016). Regeringens proposition 2016/17:146. Ett klimatpolitisk ramverk för Sverige.
   Google Scholar
• Tørstad, V., Sælen, H., & Bøyum, L. S. (2020). The domestic politics of international climate commitments: Which factors explain cross-country variation in NDC ambition? Environmental Research Letters, 15(2), 024021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab63e0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy. (2021). Industrial decarbonisation strategy. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/industrial-decarbonisation-strategy
   Google Scholar
• UK National Archives. (2008). Climate Change Act 2008. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents
   Google Scholar
• United Nations’ High-Level Expert Group on the Net Zero Emissions Commitments of Non-State Entities. (2022). Integrity Matters: Net Zero Commitments by Businesses, Financial Institutions, Cities and Regions. U. N. H. L. E. G. o. t. N. Z. E. C. o. N. S. Entities.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, L. C., Longo, M., & Mura, M. (2021). Are the European manufacturing and energy sectors on track for achieving net-zero emissions in 2050? An empirical analysis. Energy Policy, 156, 112464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar