State-led carbon data value chain development: a case study of the Republic of Korea

References

• Bansal, P., & Knox-Hayes, J. (2013). The time and space of materiality in organizations and the natural environment. Organization & Environment, 26(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612475069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. (2018). Governing the void between stakeholder management and sustainability. In S. Dorobantu, R. Aguilera, J. Luo, & F. Milliken (Eds.), Sustainability, stakeholder governance, and corporate social responsibility (Vol. 38, pp. 121–143). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S. K. (2022). Convergence of global sustainability reporting standards: Need of the hour. International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 8(1), 132–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bataineh, B., Bennon, M., & Fukuyama, F. (2019). How the belt and road gained steam: Causes and implications of China’s rise in global infrastructure. Stanford University, King Center on Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G. (2008). Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, T., Johnson, M., & Pioch, T. (2022). Corporate carbon performance data: Quo vadis? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(1), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, W. (2014). Environmental protection as market pathology?: Carbon trading and the dialectics of the ‘double movement’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(6), 1002–1018. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13038p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. (2019). Global production networks: Mapping recent conceptual developments. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(4), 775–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019). Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments: Lessons, cautions, and research needs from the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgallis, P., Henriques, I., Kourula, A., & Mair, J. (2022). Special issue of organization & environment on “the role of place in sustainability”. Organization & Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Georgallis, P., & Lee, B. (2020). Toward a theory of entry in moral markets: The role of social movements and organizational identity. Strategic Organization, 18(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019827474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewatsch, S., Kennedy, S., & Bansal, P. (2023). Tackling wicked problems in strategic management with systems thinking. Strategic Organization, 21(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211038635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, P. A. (2013). Cap and trade emission allowances and US companies’ balance sheets. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2012-0001
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P. A., Lont, D. H., & Sun, E. Y. (2017). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1265–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J., Gupta, A., & Vegelin, C. (2022). Equity, justice and the SDGs: Lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 22(2), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-022-09563-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann, F. (2015). Organizations, climate change, and transparency: Reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., Wickert, C., & Eccles, R. (2020). Special issue of Organization & Environment on “nonfinancial disclosure and real sustainable change within and beyond organizations: Mechanisms”. Organization & Environment, 33(2), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026620923160
   Google Scholar
• He, C., He, S., Mu, E., & Peng, J. (2022). Environmental economic geography: Recent advances and innovative development. Geography and Sustainability, 3(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2022.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Hertwich, E. G., & Wood, R. (2018). The growing importance of scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions from industry. Environmental Research Letters, 13(10), 104013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae19a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In, S. Y., Nguyen, Q., Diaz-Rainey, I., & Eccles, R. G. (2020). Does carbon data tells you (or not)?: The ambiguity of carbon data. Available at SSRN 3754098.
   Google Scholar
• In, S. Y., Park, K. Y., & Monk, A. (2019). Is ‘being green’ rewarded in the market?: An empirical investigation of carbon emission intensity and stock returns. Available at SSRN 3020304.
   Google Scholar
• In, S. Y., & Schumacher, K. (2021). Carbonwashing: ESG data greenwashing in a post-Paris world. In T. C. Heller & A. Seiger (Eds.), Settling climate accounts: Navigating the road to net zero (pp. 39–58). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., & Thurborn, E. (2015). Developmental environmentalism: Explaining South Korea’s ambitious pursuit of green growth. Politics & Society, 43(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329215571287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox-Hayes, J., & Wójcik, D. (2022). The Routledge handbook of financial geography. Routledge (eBook ISBN 9781351119061).
   Google Scholar
• Korean Statistical Information Service [KOSIS]. (2022). Financial status [Data file]. Retrieved 6 2023, from https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=301&tblId=DT_111Y002&conn_path=I3
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, M. (2012). Market making via regulation: The role of the state in carbon markets. Regulation & Governance, 6(4), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Zhang, J. (2018). Regional cooperation on carbon markets in East Asia. Asian Development Review, 35(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00118
   Google Scholar
• Lund, E. (2013). Environmental diplomacy: Comparing the influence of business and environmental NGOs in negotiations on reform of the clean development mechanism. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 739–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.737253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. (2009). Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Menzel, M. P., Karlsen, A., Sommer, P., Hansen, G. H., & Normann, H. E. (2019). Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning, 130, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazutis, D., Slawinski, N., & Palazzo, G. (2021). A time and place for sustainability: A spatiotemporal perspective on organizational sustainability frame development. Business & Society, 60(7), 1849–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320949843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, B., & Linnenluecke, M. K. (2019). Patterns of firm responses to different types of natural disasters. Business & Society, 58(4), 813–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317698946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mete, P., Dick, C., & Moerman, L. (2010). Creating institutional meaning: Accounting and taxation law perspectives of carbon permits. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(7), 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, A., Shishlov, I., & Brescia, D. (2019). Evolution of international carbon markets: Lessons for the Paris Agreement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(6), e613. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs [MOFA]. (2021). Submission under the paris agreement: The Republic of Korea’s enhanced update of its first nationally determined contribution. https://www.mofa.go.kr/www/brd/m_4080/view.do?seq=371966
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. (2012). Carbon flows, financial markets and climate change mitigation. Environmental Development, 1(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2011.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, D., Ferns, G., Vachhani, S., & Wright, C. (2022). Climate change, business, and society: Building relevance in time and space. Business & Society, 61(5), 1322–1352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221077452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas, S. S., Bermudez-Neubauer, M., Accenture, C. M., Stern, L., Richardson, S., & Accenture, C. M. (2010). The transparency imperative in GHG reporting: The role of technology in streamlining and enhancing reporting. In “Annual international emission inventory conference” Emissions inventories-informing emerging issues (p. 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, K., Baek, Y., In, S., & Nishikizawa, S. (2022). Sustainability reporting in Asia: Are the EU’s initiatives a benchmark for ESG disclosure in the region? Tokyo Tech Research Report.
   Google Scholar
• Slawinski, N., Pinkse, J., Busch, T., & Banerjee, S. B. (2017). The role of shorttermism and uncertainty avoidance in organizational inaction on climate change: A multi-level framework. Business & Society, 56(2), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A. P. (2013). Carbon flows, carbon markets, and low-carbon lifestyles: Reflecting on the role of markets in climate governance. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedula, S., York, J. G., & Corbett, A. C. (2019). Through the looking-glass: The impact of regional institutional logics and knowledge pool characteristics on opportunity recognition and market entry. Journal of Management Studies, 56(7), 1414–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wara, M. (2007). Is the global carbon market working? Nature, 445(7128), 595–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/445595a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2022a). World development indicators. CO2 emissions (kt). Retrieved 6 2023, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.KT?most_recent_value_desc=true
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2022b). World development indicators. CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). Retrieved 6 2023, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC
   Google Scholar
• WRI/WBCSD. (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol. A corporate accounting and reporting standard. WRI/WBCSD (ISBN 978-1-56973-772-9).
   Google Scholar