Public acceptability of carbon pricing: unravelling the impact of revenue recycling

References

• Bachus, K., Van Ootegem, L., & Verhofstadt, E. (2019). ‘No taxation without hypothecation’: Towards an improved understanding of the acceptability of an environmental tax reform. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(4), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakaki, Z., & Bernauer, T. (2017). Citizens show strong support for climate policy, but are they also willing to pay? Climatic Change, 145(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2078-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranzini, A., Caliskan, M., & Carattini, S. (2014). Economic prescriptions and public responses to climate policy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2531615
   Google Scholar
• Baranzini, A., & Carattini, S. (2017). Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: Testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 19(1), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0144-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranzini, A., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Carattini, S., Howarth, R. B., Padilla, E., & Roca, J. (2017). Carbon pricing in climate policy: Seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. WIREs Climate Change, 8(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462
   Google Scholar
• Beiser-McGrath, L. F., & Bernauer, T. (2019). Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible? Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax3323.
   Google Scholar
• Beiser-McGrath, L. F., Bernauer, T., & Prakash, A. (2022). Command and control or market-based instruments? Public support for policies to address vehicular pollution in Beijing and New Delhi. Environmental Politics, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2113608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiser-McGrath, L. F., Bernauer, T., Song, J., & Uji, A. (2021). Understanding public support for domestic contributions to global collective goods. Climatic Change, 166(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03137-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, E. O., Hall, D., Sauer, J., & Buchenrieder, G. (2022). Are carbon pricing policies on a path to failure in resource-dependent economies? A willingness-to-pay case study of Canada. Energy Policy, 162, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bento, A. M., & Jacobsen, M. (2007). Ricardian rents, environmental policy and the ‘double-dividend’ hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., Harring, N., & Jagers, S. C. (2022). Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate change taxes and laws. Nature Climate Change, 12(3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01297-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuermann, C., & Santarius, T. (2006). Ecological tax reform in Germany: Handling two hot potatoes at the same time. Energy Policy, 34(8), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. L. (1997). Environmental policy, distortionary labor taxation and employment: Pollution taxes and the double dividend. In C. Carraro (Ed.), New directions in the economic theory of the environment (pp. 69–104). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, A. L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A. M., & Chintakayala, P. K. (2010). Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1824–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carattini, S., Baranzini, A., Thalmann, P., Varone, F., & Vöhringer, F. (2017). Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable? Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(1), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0133-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carattini, S., Carvalho, M., & Fankhauser, S. (2018). Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. WIREs Climate Change, 9(5), e531. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carattini, S., Kallbekken, S., & Orlov, A. (2019). How to win public support for a global carbon tax. Nature, 565(7739), 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00124-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, T. L., Kallbekken, S., & Kroll, S. (2017). Accepting market failure: Cultural worldviews and the opposition to corrective environmental policies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinch, J. P., & Dunne, L. (2006). Environmental tax reform: An assessment of social responses in Ireland. Energy Policy, 34(8), 950–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinch, J. P., Dunne, L., & Dresner, S. (2006). Environmental and wider implications of political impediments to environmental tax reform. Energy Policy, 34(8), 960–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Golany, B., Penn, M., & Raviv, T. (2007). Creating a consensus ranking of proposals from reviewers’ partial ordinal rankings. Computers & Operations Research, 34(4), 954–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2005.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre, A., Fabre, A., Kruse, T., Planterose, B., Chico, A. S., & Stantcheva, S. (2022). Fighting climate change: International attitudes toward climate policies. OECD, 1–129. https://doi.org/10.1787/3406f29a-en
   Google Scholar
• Deroubaix, J.-F., & Lévèque, F. (2006). The rise and fall of French Ecological Tax Reform: Social acceptability versus political feasibility in the energy tax implementation process. Energy Policy, 34(8), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolšak, N., Adolph, C., & Prakash, A. (2020). Policy design and public support for carbon tax: Evidence from a 2018 US national online survey experiment. Public Administration, 98(4), 905–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douenne, T., & Fabre, A. (2020). French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecological Economics, 169, 106496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douenne, T., & Fabre, A. (2022). Yellow Vests, Pessimistic Beliefs, and Carbon Tax Aversion. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(1), 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, S., Dunne, L., Clinch, P., & Beuermann, C. (2006a). Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: An introduction to the special issue. Energy Policy, 34(8), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, S., Jackson, T., & Gilbert, N. (2006b). History and social responses to environmental tax reform in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 34(8), 930–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews, S. (2021). Public support for climate policy. Research Handbook on Environmental Sociology, 237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Drews, S., Savin, I., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Villamayor-Tomás, S. (2022). Climate concern and policy acceptance before and after COVID-19. Ecological Economics, 199, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, S. J., Teisl, M. F., & McCoy, S. K. (2015). Are acceptance, support, and the factors that affect them, different? Examining perceptions of U.S. fuel economy standards. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 39, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, S. J., & Walker, I. (2013). Acceptance and Support of the Australian Carbon Policy. Social Justice Research, 26(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0191-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dütschke, E., Preuß, S., Brunzema, I., & Piria, R. (2023). Using the revenues from carbon pricing—Insights into the acceptance and perceptions of particularly burdened groups. Energy Policy, 175, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewald, J., Sterner, T., & Sterner, E. (2022). Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters. Resource and Energy Economics, 70, 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M. (2019). When Will People Pay to Pollute? Environmental Taxes, Political Trust and Experimental Evidence from Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M. (2022). Public opinion about climate policies: A review and call for more studies of what people want. PLOS Climate, 1(5), e0000030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000030
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I., & Kulin, J. (2019). Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change, 59, 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragkos, P., Fragkiadakis, K., Sovacool, B., Paroussos, L., Vrontisi, Z., & Charalampidis, I. (2021). Equity implications of climate policy: Assessing the social and distributional impacts of emission reduction targets in the European Union. Energy, 237, 121591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire-González, J. (2018). Environmental taxation and the double dividend hypothesis in CGE modelling literature: A critical review. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40(1), 194–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire-González, J., & Ho, M. (2018). Environmental Fiscal Reform and the Double Dividend: Evidence from a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model. Sustainability, 10(2), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevrek, Z. E., & Uyduranoglu, A. (2015). Public preferences for carbon tax attributes. Ecological Economics, 118, 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H. (2008). Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsrud, K. M., Lindhjem, H., Sem, I. V., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2020). Public acceptance and willingness to pay cost-effective taxes on red meat and city traffic in Norway. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2019.1673213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerle, M., Best, R., & Crosby, P. (2021). Public acceptance of carbon taxes in Australia. Energy Economics, 101, 105420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C. (2006). Regulation by Prices, Quantities, or Both: A Review of Instrument Choice. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S.-L., Walters, J., & Purgas, A. (2008). Pollution tax heuristics: An empirical study of willingness to pay higher gasoline taxes. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3612–3619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., Lachapelle, E., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2021). Bridging the ideological gap? How fairness perceptions mediate the effect of revenue recycling on public support for carbon taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany. Review of Policy Research, 38(5), 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2019). The impact of compensatory measures on public support for carbon taxation: An experimental study in Sweden. Climate Policy, 19(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1470963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., & Aasen, M. (2010). The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2183–2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, S. A., & McCright, A. M. (2015). Effects of policy characteristics and justifications on acceptance of a gasoline tax increase. Energy Policy, 87, 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018). Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8(8), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klok, J., Larsen, A., Dahl, A., & Hansen, K. (2006). Ecological Tax Reform in Denmark: History and social acceptability. Energy Policy, 34(8), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konc, T., Drews, S., Savin, I., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2022). Co-dynamics of climate policy stringency and public support. Global Environmental Change, 74, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M. J., Turk, Z. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2017). Public willingness to pay for a US carbon tax and preferences for spending the revenue. Environmental Research Letters, 12(9), 094012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa822a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & MacInnis, B. (2013). Does the American Public Support Legislation to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Daedalus, 142(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyselá, E., Ščasný, M., & Zvěřinová, I. (2019). Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: A review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes. Climate Policy, 19(7), 878–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1611534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, S. (2021). Why hate carbon taxes? Machine learning evidence on the roles of personal responsibility, trust, revenue recycling, and other factors across 23 European countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 73, 101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., Savin, I., & van den Bergh, J. (2021). Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27380-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. (2019). Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: A review of the literature. Climate Policy, 19(9), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehleb, R. I., Kallis, G., & Zografos, C.. (2021). A discourse analysis of yellow-vest resistance against carbon taxes. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 40, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M., Lachapelle, E., Harrison, K., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2022). Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing. Nature Climate Change, 12(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01268-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, I., Hasnu, N. N. M., & Ekins, P. (2021). Empirical research of public acceptance on environmental tax: A systematic literature review. Environments, 8(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8100109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, B., & Rivers, N. (2015). British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy, 86, 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1984). Public finance in theory and practice (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nowlin, M. C., Gupta, K., & Ripberger, J. T. (2020). Revenue use and public support for a carbon tax. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab92c3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (1997). Environmental taxes and green tax reform. OECD, 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Effective Carbon Rates 2021: Pricing Carbon Emissions through Taxes and Emissions Trading. https://doi.org/10.1787/0e8e24f5-en
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. (1991). The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming. The Economic Journal, 101(407), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., Agnolucci, P., Leon, M. M., de, O., Fischer, C., & Heine, D. (2023). Chapter 5 Carbon Pricing Around the World. In Data for a Greener World: A Guide for Practitioners and Policymakers. International Monetary Fund. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/display/book/9798400217296/CH005.xml
   Google Scholar
• Rafaty, R. (2018). Perceptions of Corruption, Political Distrust, and the Weakening of Climate Policy. Global Environmental Politics, 18(3), 106–129. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E., & Reilly, J. M. (2011). Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households. Energy Economics, 33, S20–S33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotaris, L., & Danielis, R. (2019). The willingness to pay for a carbon tax in Italy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin, I., Drews, S., Maestre-Andrés, S., & van den Bergh, J. (2020). Public views on carbon taxation and its fairness: A computational-linguistics analysis. Climatic Change, 162(4), 2107–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02842-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., & Bergstad, C. (2018). Acceptability of environmental policies. In L. Steg, & J. I. M. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 295–306). Wiley-Blackwell. http://kuleuven.e-bronnen.be/login?url = https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct = true&db = nlebk&AN = 1929517&site = ehost-live&scope = site
   Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sælen, H., & Kallbekken, S. (2011). A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2181–2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, S., Mattauch, L., & Pahle, M. (2022). Supporting carbon taxes: The role of fairness. Ecological Economics, 195, 107359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, L.-A. (2021). A classification framework for carbon tax revenue use. Climate Policy, 21(7), 897–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1946381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2006). Why are Energy Policies Acceptable and Effective? Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505278519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E., Stern, N., Duan, M., Edenhofer, O., Giraud, G., Heal, G. M., la Rovere, E. L., Morris, A., Moyer, E., Pangestu, M., Shukla, P. R., Sokona, Y., & Winkler, H. (2017). Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. 1–61. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-w2nc-4103
   Google Scholar
• Tatham, M., & Peters, Y. (2023). Fueling opposition? Yellow vests, urban elites, and fuel taxation. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(3), 574–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2148172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalmann, P. (2004). The Public Acceptance of Green Taxes: 2 Million Voters Express Their Opinion. Public Choice, 119(1/2), 179–217. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024165.18082.db
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyduranoglu, A., & Ozturk, S. S. (2020). Public support for carbon taxation in Turkey: Drivers and barriers. Climate Policy, 20(9), 1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1816887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Hubacek, K., Feng, K., Wei, Y.-M., & Liang, Q.-M. (2016). Distributional effects of carbon taxation. Applied Energy, 184, 1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worldbank. (2022). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1895-0
   Google Scholar
• Worldbank. (2023). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. https://doi.org/10.1596/39796
   Google Scholar
• Zawadzki, S. J., Vrieling, L., & van der Werff, E. (2022). What influences public acceptability of sustainable energy policies? The crucial role of funding and who benefits. Energy Research & Social Science, 87, 102468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar