The Role of Regret in Institutional Persistence and Change

References

• Arkes, H. R., Kung, Y., & Hutzel, L. (2002). Regret, valuation, and inaction inertia. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 371–385. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E., & Zerbe, W. J. (2012). Experiencing and managing emotions in the workplace (Vol. 8). Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 491–518). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676. doi: 10.1177/1350508406067008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J. (2011). The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: Evidence from the UK National Health Service. Organization Science, 22(4), 817–834. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. doi: 10.1080/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2010). Institutional isomorphism revisited: Convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 150–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.5.961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., Munir, K., & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393–1418.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2005). On the psychology of ‘if only’: Regret and the comparison between factual and counterfactual outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, S., Berends, H., Jelinek, M., Romme, A. G. L., & Weggeman, M. (2011). Micro-institutional affordances and strategies of radical innovation. Organization Studies, 32(11), 1485–1513. doi: 10.1177/0170840611421253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57–88. doi: 10.2307/2393494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S. B., & Barden, J. (2006). Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31, 347–365. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350–382. doi: 10.2307/256833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspan, A. (2007). The age of turbulence: Adventures in a new world. London: Allen-Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, M. (2008). Hedging against $200 oil. Businessweek. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2008/db2008056_075377.htm
   Google Scholar
• Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 62–66. doi: 10.1177/1056492610387705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, J. (2007). Regret regulation: Disentangling self-reproach from learning. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 19–24. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (1st ed.). New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. doi: 10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246(1), 160–173. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, K. C. (2011). Challenging operations: Medical reform and resistance in surgery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by the subsidiaries of the multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 215–233. doi: 10.2307/3069293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, J. Y. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. K. Y. (2013). Comparing predicted and actual affective responses to process versus outcome: An emotion-as-feedback perspective. Cognition, 129, 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, J. (1993). Regret: The persistence of the possible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. doi: 10.1177/1056492610387222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Economic Journal, 92, 805–824. doi: 10.2307/2232669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of institutions. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, E. (2010). US airlines more cautious on ’10 fuel hedges. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61O59Z20100225
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michenaud, S., & Solnik, B. (2008). Applying regret theory to investment choices: Currency hedging decisions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27, 677–694. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickel, A. E., & Ozcelik, H. (2008). When executives get angry: The importance of anger and its triggers to ethical awareness and sensitivity. Emotions, Ethics and Decision-Making, 4, 131–154. doi: 10.1016/S1746-9791(08)04006-6
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., & Turnbull, W. (1990). The counterfactual fallacy: Confusing what might have been with what ought to have been. Social Justice Research, 4, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/BF01048532
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263–277. doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960030404
   Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A. (2005). What we regret most … and why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1273–1285. doi: 10.1177/0146167205274693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shimanoff, S. B. (1984). Commonly named emotions in everyday conversations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(2), 514. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.58.2.514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tykocinski, O. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1998). The consequences of doing nothing: Inaction inertia as avoidance of anticipated counterfactual regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 607–616. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronov, M., & Vince, R. (2012). Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 58–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 202–228. doi: 10.2307/2667086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2007). Effects of rater goals on rating patterns: Evidence from an experimental field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 577–585. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M. (1999a). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93–106. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<93::AID-BDM311>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M. (1999b). The use of crying over spilled milk: A note on the rationality and functionality of regret. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 325–340. doi: 10.1080/095150899105800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., van der Pligt, J., & de Vries, N. K. (1996). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 148–158. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2008). The role of interpersonal harm in distinguishing regret from guilt. Emotion, 8(5), 589--596. doi: 10.1037/a0012894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., van der Pligt, J., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Undoing regret on Dutch television: Apologizing for interpersonal regrets involving actions or inactions. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 24, 1113–1119. doi: 10.1177/01461672982410008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional logics and institutional work: Should they be agreed? Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39, 77–96. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039A007
   Google Scholar