When the Gallic Village Strikes Back: The Politics Behind ‘New Ways of Working’ ProjectsFootnote^*

* The authors confirm that the paper has not previously been published, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

The authors confirm that the paper does not use the same data set as another article.

References

• Alutto, J., & Belasco, J. (1972). A typology for participation in organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aroles, J., Mitev, N., & De Vaujany, F. (2019). Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmos, D., & McDaniel, R. (1996). Understanding the participation of critical task specialists in strategic decision making. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, H., & Castel, P. (2015). Les habits neufs du néo-institutionnalisme? La redécouverte de l’ordre mésologique et de l’agency. L’Année Sociologique, 3, 23–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bijl, D. W. (2011). Journey towards the new way of working. Creating sustainable performance and joy at work. Zeewolde: Par CC.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Cregan, C. (2008). Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement. Human Resource Management, 47(4), 667–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunia, S., De Been, I., & van der Voordt, T. (2016). Accommodating New Ways of Working: Lessons from best practices and worst cases. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 18(1), 30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabantous, L., & Gond, J. (2011). Rational decision making as performative praxis: Explaining rationality’s eternel retour. Organization Science, 22(3), 573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–229). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, P., & Friedberg, E. (2010). Institutional change as an interactive process: The case of the modernization of the French cancer centers. Organization Science, 21(2), 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, M. (1961). Human relations at the management level in a bureaucratic system of organization. Human Organization, 20, 51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1980). Actors & systems. The politics of collective action. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., & Thoenig, J. (1976). The regulation of complex organized systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 547–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2001). Is it possible to be a constructionist consultant? Management Learning, 32(2), 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leede, J. (2017). New ways of working: Antecedents and outcomes. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Denyer, D., Parry, E., & Flowers, P. (2011). “Social”, “open” and “participative”? Exploring personal experiences and organisational effects of enterprise2.0 use. Long Range Planning, 44(5), 375–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufresne, S., Jemine, G., Rondeaux, G., & Pichault, F. (2018, June). “Beyond flexibility: Confronting normative and lived spaces of New Ways of Working”, 8th Organizations, Artifacts & Practices workshop: “New Ways of Working: Rematerializing Organizations in the Digital Age”, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, R. G., & Foster, M. J. (1982). The relationship of participation and effectiveness in strategic planning. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanna, S. (2008). Planning and participation as determinants of strategic planning effectiveness. Evidence from the Arabic context. Management Decision, 46(5), 779–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin, D., & Garman, A. (2010). Resistance to organizational change: Linking research and practice. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 31(1), 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, R. (2006). Open-processional change: Three principles of reciprocal-relational power. Journal of Change Management, 6(2), 193–216.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, E. (1988). L’analyse sociologique des organisations. L’Harmattan: Pour n°28.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerards, R., Grip, A., & Baudewijns, C. (2018). Do new ways of working increase work engagement? Personnel Review, 47(2), 517–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giangreco, A., & Peccei, R. (2005). The nature and antecedents of middle manager resistance to change: Evidence from an Italian context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(10), 1812–1829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemine, G., Dubois, C., & Pichault, F. (2019). From a new workplace to a new way of working: Legitimizing organizational change. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management. doi:10.1108/QROM-10-2018-1690
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, S. (2019). New ways of working (NWW): Work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Culture and Organization, 25(5), 383–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma, S., Dale, K., & Wasserman, V. (2019). Organizational space and beyond: The significance of Henri Lefebvre for organization studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kok, A., Esten, R., & Helms, R. (2015). Knowledge sharing in the new world of work: Effects of the New Way of Working. Journal of Information Technology Services, 14(2), 315–335.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leca, B., Gond, J., Déjean, F., & Huault, I. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurs as competing translators: A comparative study in an emerging activity. Paper presented at the XVeme Conference Internationale de Management Stratégique, Genève.
   Google Scholar
• Lines, R. (2004). Influence of participation in strategic change: Resistance, organizational commitment and change goal achievement. Journal of Change Management, 4(3), 193–215.
   Google Scholar
• Lines, R. (2007). Using power to install strategy: The relationships between expert power, position power, influence tactics and implementation success. Journal of Change Management, 7(2), 143–170.
   Google Scholar
• Lines, R., Selart, M., Espedal, B., & Johansen, S. (2005). The production of trust during organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 5(2), 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• Lunenburg, F. (2010). Managing change: The role of the change agent. International Journal of Management, Business and Administration, 13(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, X., & Noizet, F. (2017). New ways of working. Reinventing the company. Wavestone White Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, F., & De Leede, J. (2015). Fostering innovation: The influence of New Ways of Working on innovative work behavior – An explanatory multiple case study among white-collar and knowledge workers. In J. De Leede (Ed.), New ways of working practices: Antecedents and outcomes (pp. 95–143). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2012). The importance of employee participation and perceptions of changes in procedures in a teamworking intervention. Work and Stress, 26(2), 91–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørskov, S., Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. (2017). Deliberate change without hierarchical influence? The case of collaborative OSS communities. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(2), 346–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo-del-Val, M., Martínez-Fuentes, C., & Roig-Dobón, S. (2012). Participative management and its influence on organizational change. Management Decision, 50(10), 1843–1860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1977). Organization design: The case for a coalitional model of organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 6(2), 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, J., Costello, K., & Sankaran, S. (2013). Applying actor-network theory as a sensemaking framework for complex organizational change programs. International Journal of Project Management, 31(8), 1118–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruostela, J., Lönnqvist, A., Palvalin, M., Vuolle, M., Patjas, M., & Raij, A. (2015). ‘New Ways of Working’ as a tool for improving the performance of a knowledge-intensive company. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(4), 382–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, T. (2008). Communicating change: A review and critical analysis of programmatic and participatory implementation approaches. Journal of Change Management, 8(3-4), 199–211.
   Google Scholar
• Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 453–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power — and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smollan, R., & Sayers, J. (2009). Organizational culture, change and emotions: A qualitative study. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 435–457.
   Google Scholar
• Specht, J., Kuonath, A., Pachler, D., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2018). How change agents’ motivation Facilitates organizational change: Pathways through meaning and organizational identification. Journal of Change Management, 18(3), 198–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taskin, L., & Ajzen, M. (2015). Managing sustainable and innovative workplaces: NWOW, towards sustainable organizational performance? Working paper: Louvain School of Management Research Institute, UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Taskin, L., Ajzen, M., & Donis, C. (2017). New Ways of Working: From smart to shared power. In V. Muhlbauer, & W. Harry (Eds.), Redefining management (pp. 65–79). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vallas, S. (2006). Empowerment Redux: Structure, agency, and the remaking of managerial authority. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1677–1717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Steenbergen, E., van der Ven, C., Peeters, M., & Taris, T. (2018). Transitioning towards New Ways of Working: Do job demands, job resources, and engagement change? Psychological Reports, 121(4), 736–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar