Managing Responsibly Together: How an Obligation is Made to Matter in Top Management Team Work

References

• Adler, N. J., & Laasch, O. (2020). Responsible leadership and management: Key distinctions and shared concerns. In O. Laasch, D. Jamali, R. E. Freeman, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Research handbook of responsible management (pp. 100–112). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971966
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (1996). Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90002-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). 1 Constitutional amendments: “materializing” organizational communication. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencherki, N., Sergi, V., Cooren, F., & Vásquez, C. (2021). How strategy comes to matter: Strategizing as the communicative materialization of matters of concern. Strategic Organization, 19(4), 608–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019890380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bexell, M., & Jönsson, K. (2017). Responsibility and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2016.1252424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., Gustafsson Nordin, I., & Tamm Hallström, K. (2022). ‘Un-responsible’ organization: How more organization produces less responsibility. Organization Theory, 3(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221131582
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Barberg, B., Crosby, B. C., & Patton, M. Q. (2021). Leading social transformations: Creating public value and advancing the common good. Journal of Change Management, 21(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1917492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• By, R. T. (2020). Organizational change and leadership: Out of the quagmire. Journal of Change Management, 20(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1716459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2016). Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 24(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2016.1113963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Brummans, B. H., & Charrieras, D. (2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Médecins Sans Frontières in action. Human Relations, 61(10), 1339–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708095707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2011). Performativity in place of responsibility? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(4), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111175779
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. Truman Talley.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/256485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1970). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 193–238. https://doi.org/10.1086/259623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2019). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., & Laasch, O. (2022). Responsible management-as-practice: Mobilizing a posthumanist approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04945-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godemann, J., Haertle, J., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2014). United nations supported principles for responsible management education: Purpose, progress and prospects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (1987). The top management team: Key to strategic success. California Management Review, 30(1), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Review, 37(3), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D., & Holt, R., (Eds.) (2014). The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert, P., & Cunliffe, A. (2015). Responsible management: Engaging moral reflexive practice through threshold concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1993-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D., & Balogun, J. (2022). From germination to propagation: Two decades of strategy-as-practice research and potential future directions. Human Relations, 75(8), 1533–1559. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221089473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J. R. (1997). The myth of the top management team. Harvard Business Review, 75(November-December), 82–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knight, E., & Cuganesan, S. (2020). Enabling organizational ambidexterity: Valuation practices and the senior-leadership team. Human Relations, 73(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korica, M., Nicolini, D., & Johnson, B. (2017). In search of ‘managerial work’: Past, present, and future of an analytical category. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laasch, O., Suddaby, R., Freeman, R. E., & Jamali, D.(Eds.). (2020a). Research handbook of responsible management. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Laasch, O., Suddaby, R., Freeman, R. E., & Jamali, D. (2020b). Mapping the emerging field of responsible management: Domains, spheres, themes, and future research. In O. Laasch, R. Suddaby, R. E. Freeman, & D. Jamali (Eds.), Research handbook of responsible management (pp. 2–39). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971966
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In D. Bergh & D. Ketchen (Eds.), Building methodological bridges: Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 201–235). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-8387(2011)00000060
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001 https://www.jstor.org/stable/23414342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, O., Nnam, I. J., Olaniyan, J. D., & Tariquzzaman, A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGS): assessment of implementation progress in BRICS and MINT. In V. Tauringana & O. Moses (Eds.), Environmental sustainability and agenda 2030. Advances in environmental accounting & management (pp. 11–44). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., Foldy, E. G., El Hadidy, W., Dodge, J., Hofmann-Pinilla, A., & Su, C. (2012). Social change leadership as relational leadership. In M. Uhl-Bien & S. M. Ospina (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives (pp. 255–302). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Price, O. M., Gherardi, S., & Manidis, M. (2020). Enacting responsible management: A practice-based perspective. In O. Laasch, D. Jamali, R. E. Freeman, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Research handbook of responsible management (pp. 392–409). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Priem, R. L., Lyon, D. W., & Dess, G. G. (1999). Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25(6), 935–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, H. B. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, N. (1989). Strategic leadership patterns. Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100706. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486582
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Nistelrooij, I., & Visse, M. (2019). Me? The invisible call of responsibility and its promise for care ethics: A phenomenological view. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 22(2), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9873-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, C., Bencherki, N., Cooren, F., & Sergi, V. (2018). From ‘matters of concern’ to ‘matters of authority’: Studying the performativity of strategy from a communicative constitution of organization (CCO) approach. Long Range Planning, 51(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, D. A., & Galvin, B. M. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/258977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar