Portfolio credit risk with predetermined default orders

References

• Arnsorff, M. and Halperin, I., BSLP: Markovian bivariate spread-loss model for portfolio credit derivatives. J. Comput. Finance, 2008, 12(2), 77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bélanger, A., Shreve, S. and Wong, D., A general framework for pricing credit risk. Math. Finance, 2004, 14(3), 317–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatngar, N. and Peled, R., Lengths of monotone subsequences in a Mallows permutation, 2008. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.3674 ( accessed 25 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bielecki, T.R., Cousin, A., Crèpey, S. and Herbertsson, A., A bottom-up dynamic model of portfolio credit risk. Part I: Markov copula perspective. In Recent Advances in Financial Engineering 2012, edited by A. Takahashi, Y. Muromachi, and T. Shibata, pp. 25–49, 2014a (World Scientific: Singapore).
   Google Scholar
• Bielecki, T.R., Cousin, A., Crèpey, S. and Herbertsson, A., Dynamic hedging of portfolio credit risk in a Markov copula model. J. Optim. Theory Appl., 2014b, 161(1), 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielecki, T.R., Crepey, S. and Jeanblanc, M., Up and down credit risk. Quant. Finance, 2010, 10(10), 1137–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielecki, T.R. and Rutkowski, M., Credit Risk: Modeling, Valuation and Hedging, 2002 (Springer: Berlin).
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet-Scalliet, C. and Jeanblanc, M., Hazard rate for credit risk and hedging defaultable contingent claims. Finance Stoch., 2004, 8(1), 145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyère, R., Cont, R., Copinot, R., Fery, L., Jaeck, C. and Spitz, T., Credit derivatives and structured credit, A guide for investors, 2006 (Wiley: Chichester).
   Google Scholar
• Cont, R. and Minca, A., Recovering portfolio default intensities implied by CDO quotes. Math. Finance, 2013, 23(1), 94–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., Duffie, D., Kapadia, N. and Saita, L., Common failings: How corporate defaults are correlated. J. Finance, 2007, 62(1), 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X., Giesecke, K. and Tomecek, P., Time-changed birth processes and multi-name credit. Oper. Res., 2009, 57(4), 990–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffie, D., Credit risk with affine processes. J. Bank. Finance, 2005, 29(11), 2751–2802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffie, D., Filipović, D. and Schachermayer, W., Affine processes and applications in finance. Ann. Appl. Probab., 2003, 13(3), 984–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers, P. and Schonbucher, P., Background filtrations and canonical loss processes for top-down models of portfolio credit risk. Finance Stoch., 2009, 13(1), 79–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errais, E., Giesecke, K. and Goldberg, L.R., Affine point processes and portfolio credit risk. SIAM J. Financ. Math., 2010, 1(1), 642–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, R. and Backhaus, J., Pricing and hedging of portfolio credit derivatives with interacting default intensities. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 2008, 11(6), 611–634.
   Google Scholar
• Giesecke, K., Portfolio credit risk: Top-down vs bottom-up. In Frontiers in Quantitative Finance: Credit Risk and Volatility Modeling, edited by R. Cont, pp. 251–267, 2008 (Wiley: Hoboken, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Giesecke, K., Goldberg, L. and Ding, X., A top-down approach to multi-name credit. Oper. Res., 2011, 59(2), 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesecke, G., Kakavand, H., Mousavi, M. and Takada, H., Exact and efficient simulation of correlated defaults. SIAM J. Financ. Math., 2010, 1(1), 868–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbertsson, A., Pricing synthetic CDO tranches in a model with default contagion using the matrix analytic approach. J. Credit Risk, 2008, 4(4), 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Herbertsson, A. and Rootzen, H., Pricing kth-to-default swaps under default contagion: The matrix-analytic approach. J. Comput. Finance, 2008, 12(1), 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrow, R. and Yu, F., Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable. J. Finance, 2001, 56(5), 1765–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanblanc, M., Yor, M. and Chesney, M., Mathematical Methods for Financial Markets, 2009 (Springer: London).
   Google Scholar
• Jorion, P. and Zhang, G., Credit contagion from counterparty risk. J. Finance, 2009, 64(5), 2053–2087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moler, C. and Loan, C.V., Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix. SIAM Rev., 1978, 20(4), 801–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moler, C. and Loan, C.V., Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix, twenty-five years later. SIAM Rev., 2003, 45(1), 3–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonbucher, P., Portfolio losses and the term structure of loss transition rates: A new methodology for the pricing of portfolio credit derivatives. Working Paper, University of Zurich, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sidenius, J., Piterbarg, V. and Anderson, L., A new framework for dynamic credit portfolio loss modeling. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 2009, 11(2), 163–197.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, L. and Chen, Z.Y., A simple model for default times and default orders. Acta Sci. Natur. Univ. Nankaiensis (Science Edition), 2014, 47(1), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, F., Correlated defaults in intensity-based models. Math. Finance, 2007, 17(2), 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H. and Jiang, L., Basket CDS pricing with interacting intensities. Finance Stoch., 2009, 13(3), 445–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar