A parsimonious model for generating arbitrage-free scenario trees

References

• Carinõ, D.R. and Ziemba, W.T., Formulation of the Russel--Yasuda Kasai financial planning model. Oper. Res., 1998, 46(4), 433–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. and Xu, D., Knowledge-based scenario tree generation methods and application in multiperiod portfolio selection problem. Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind., 2014, 30, 240–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubini, U., Luciano, E. and Vecchiato, W., Copula Methods in Finance, 2004 (Wiley: Chichester).
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, J.H. and Saa-Requejo, J., Beyond arbitrage: Good-deal asset price bounds in incomplete markets. J. Polit. Econ., 2000, 108(1), 79–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consigli, G., Iaquinta, G. and Moriggia, V., Path-dependent scenario trees for multistage stochastic programs in finance. Quant. Finance, 2010, 12(8), 1265–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consiglio, A. and De Giovanni, D., Evaluation of insurance products with guarantee in incomplete markets. Insur.: Math. Econ., 2008, 42(1), 332–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consiglio, A., Nielsen, S. and Zenios, S.A., Practical Financial Optimization: A Libray of GAMS Models, 2009 (Wiley: Chichester). Available online at: https://www.gams.com/finlib/libhtml/ (accessed 17 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Consiglio, A., Saunders, D. and Zenios, S.A., Asset and liability management for insurance products with minimum guarantees: The UK case. J. Bank. Finance, 2006, 30, 645–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Date, P., Mamon, R. and Jalen, L., A new moment matching algorithm for sampling from partially specified symmetric distributions. Oper. Res. Lett., 2008, 36, 669–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembo, R., Aziz, A., Rosen, D. and Zerbs, M., Mark to Future---A Framework for Measuring Risk and Reward, 2000 (Algorithmics Publications: Toronto).
   Google Scholar
• Dembo, R., Rosen, D. and Saunders, D., Valuation in incomplete markets: An optimization approach. Algo Res. Q., 2000, 3(2), 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dupačová, J., Consigli, G. and Wallace, S.W., Scenarios for multistage stochastic programs. Ann. Oper. Res., 2000, 100, 25–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupačová, J., Gröewe-Kuska, N. and Römish, W., Scenario reduction in stochastic programming. Math. Program., 2003, 95(3), 493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floudas, C. and Gounaris, C., A review of recent advances in global optimization. J. Global Optim., 2009, 45(1), 3–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, A., Hanke, M. and Weissensteiner, A., No-arbitrage conditions, scenario trees, and multi-asset financial optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2010, 206(3), 609–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, A., Hanke, M. and Weissensteiner, A., No-arbitrage bounds for financial scenarios. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2014a, 236(2), 657–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, A., Hanke, M. and Weissensteiner, A., No-arbitrage ROM simulation. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 2014b, 45, 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasserman, P., Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering, 2004 (Springer-Verlag: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Hochreiter, R. and Pflug, G.C., Financial scenario generation for stochastic multi-stage decision processes as facility location problems. Ann. Oper. Res., 2007, 152(1), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyland, K., Kaut, M. and Wallace, S.W., A heuristic for moment matching scenario generation. Comput. Optim. Appl., 2003, 24, 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyland, K. and Wallace, S.W., Generation scenario trees for multistage decision problems. Manage. Sci., 2001, 47(2), 295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidian, F. and Zhu, Y., Scenario simulation: Theory and methodology. Finance Stoch., 1997, 1(1), 43–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kaut, M. and Wallace, S.W., Evaluation of scenario generation methods for stochastic programming. Pac. J. Optim., 2007, 3, 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• King, A.J., Duality and martingales: A stochastic programming perspective on contingent claims. Math. Program., Ser. B, 2002, 91, 543–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaassen, P., Comment on “Generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems”. Manage. Sci., 2002, 48(11), 1512–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Li, H., Gounaris, C. and Floudas, C., Convex relaxation for solving posynomial programs. J. Global Optim., 2010, 46(1), 147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundell, A., Westerlund, J. and Westerlund, T., Some transformation techniques with applications in global optimization. J. Global Optim., 2009, 43, 391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranas, C. and Floudas, C., Finding all solutions of nonlinearly constrained systems of equations. J. Global Optim., 1995, 7(2), 143–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maranas, C. and Floudas, C., Global optimization in generalized geometric programming. Comput. Chem. Eng., 1997, 21, 351–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, J.M. and Vladimirou, H., Stochastic network programming for financial planning problems. Manage. Sci., 1992, 38(11), 1642–1664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliska, S.R., Introduction to Mathematical Finance: Discrete Time Models, 1997 (Blackwell: Malden, MA).
   Google Scholar
• Rebonato, R., Mahal, S., Joshi, M., Buchholz, L. and Nyholm, K., Evolving yield curves in the real-world measures: A semi-parametric approach. J. Risk, 2005, 7(3), 29–61.
   Google Scholar
• Topaloglou, N., Vladimirou, H. and Zenios, S.A., Pricing options on scenario trees. J. Bank. Finance, 2008, 32(2), 283–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, J. and Lin, M., Finding all solutions of systems of nonlinear equations with free variables. Eng. Optim., 2007, 39(6), 649–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D. and Wagenmakers, E.-J., Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. In Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology, edited by J. Busemeyer, J. Townsend, Z.J. Wang and A. Eidels, pp. 300–317, 2015 (Oxford University Press: Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D., Chen, Z. and Yang, L., Scenario tree generation approaches using k-means and lp moment matching methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2012, 236, 4561–4579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenios, S.A., Practical Financial Optimization: Decision making for Financial Engineers, 2007 (Blackwell: Malden, MA).
   Google Scholar
• Zenios, S.A., Holmer, M.R., McKendall, R. and Vassiadou-Zeniou, C., Dynamic models for fixed-income portfolio management under uncertainty. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 1998, 22, 1517–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar