Implied stopping rules for American basket options from Markovian projection

References

• Achdou, Y. and Pironneau, O., Computational Methods for Option Pricing, 2005 (SIAM: Philadelphia).
   Google Scholar
• Ametrano, F., Ballabio, L., Bianchetti, M., Cesare, N., Eddelbuettel, D., Firth, N., Jean, N., Kenyon, C., Lichters, R., Marchioro, M., et al., QuantLib – a free/open-source library for quantitative finance, 2015. Available at https://github.com/lballabio/quantlib
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, L.B., A simple approach to the pricing of Bermudan swaptions in the multi-factor Libor market model, 1999. Available at SSRN 155208.
   Google Scholar
• Bally, V., Pagès, G., Printems, J., et al., A quantization tree method for pricing and hedging multidimensional American options. Math. Finance, 2005, 15, 119–168. doi: 10.1111/j.0960-1627.2005.00213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraquand, J. and Martineau, D., Numerical valuation of high dimensional multivariate American securities. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 1995, 30, 383–405. doi: 10.2307/2331347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, C. and Laurence, P., Asymptotics beats Monte Carlo: The case of correlated local vol baskets. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 2014, 67, 1618–1657. doi: 10.1002/cpa.21488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, C., Siebenmorgen, M. and Tempone, R., Smoothing the payoff for efficient computation of basket option prices, 2016. Preprint. Available online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.05572.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, C., Szepessy, A. and Tempone, R., Adaptive weak approximation of reflected and stopped diffusions. Monte Carlo Method Appl., 2010, 16, 1–67. doi: 10.1515/mcma.2010.001
   Google Scholar
• Belomestny, D., Pricing Bermudan options by nonparametric regression: Optimal rates of convergence for lower estimates. Finance Stoch., 2011, 15, 655–683. doi: 10.1007/s00780-010-0132-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belomestny, D., Dickmann, F. and Nagapetyan, T., Pricing Bermudan options via multilevel approximation methods. SIAM J. Financ. Math., 2015, 6, 448–466. doi: 10.1137/130912426
   Google Scholar
• Birge, J.R., Quasi-Monte Carlo approaches to option pricing. Ann Arbor, 1994, 1001, 48109.
   Google Scholar
• Black, F. and Scholes, M., The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Polit. Econ., 1973, 81, 637–654. doi: 10.1086/260062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadie, M. and Glasserman, P., Pricing American-style securities using simulation. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 1997, 21, 1323–1352. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1889(97)00029-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, F., Computing exit times with the Euler scheme. In Proceedings of the Seminar für Angewandte Mathematik, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S. and Marcozzi, M.D., A numerical approach to American currency option valuation. J. Deriv., 2001, 9, 19–29. doi: 10.3905/jod.2001.319172
   Google Scholar
• Cont, R., Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant. Finance, 2001, 1, 223–236. doi: 10.1080/713665670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J., Notes on option pricing I: Constant elasticity of variance diffusions. Unpublished note, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Djehiche, B. and Löfdahl, B., Risk aggregation and stochastic claims reserving in disability insurance. Insur. Math. Econ., 2014, 59, 100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E.F., The behavior of stock-market prices. J. Bus., 1965, 38, 34–105. doi: 10.1086/294743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, L., Kovalov, P., Linetsky, V. and Marcozzi, M., Variational methods in derivatives pricing. Handbooks Oper. Res. Manage. Sci., 2007, 15, 301–342. doi: 10.1016/S0927-0507(07)15007-6
   Google Scholar
• Giles, M.B., Multilevel Monte Carlo methods. Acta Numer., 2015, 24, 259–328. doi: 10.1017/S096249291500001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasserman, P., Yu, B., et al., Number of paths versus number of basis functions in American option pricing. Ann. Appl. Probab., 2004, 14, 2090–2119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goutis, C. and Casella, G., Explaining the saddlepoint approximation. Am. Stat., 1999, 53, 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunspan, C., A note on the equivalence between the normal and the lognormal implied volatility: A model free approach, 2011. Available at SSRN 1894652.
   Google Scholar
• Guyon, J., Cross-dependent volatility, 2015. Available at SSRN 2615162.
   Google Scholar
• Gyöngy, I., Mimicking the one-dimensional marginal distributions of processes having an Itô differential. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 1986, 71, 501–516. doi: 10.1007/BF00699039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, C., Hüeber, S. and Wohlmuth, B.I., Numerical techniques for the valuation of basket options and their Greeks. J. Comput. Finance, 2010, 13, 3–33. doi: 10.21314/JCF.2010.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugh, M.B. and Kogan, L., Pricing American options: A duality approach. Oper. Res., 2004, 52, 258–270. doi: 10.1287/opre.1030.0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilber, N., Matache, A.M. and Schwab, C., Sparse wavelet methods for option pricing under stochastic volatility. J. Comp. Fin., 2005, 8, 1–42. doi: 10.21314/JCF.2005.131
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, M.S., The convergence of binomial trees for pricing the American put, 2007. Available at SSRN 1030143.
   Google Scholar
• Joy, C., Boyle, P.P. and Tan, K.S., Quasi-Monte Carlo methods in numerical finance. Manage. Sci., 1996, 42, 926–938. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.42.6.926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangro, R. and Nicolaides, R., Far field boundary conditions for Black–Scholes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2000, 38, 1357–1368. doi: 10.1137/S0036142999355921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaliq, A.Q., Voss, D.A. and Kazmi, K., Adaptive θ-methods for pricing American options. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2008, 222, 210–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstaff, F.A. and Schwartz, E.S., Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2001, 14, 113–147. doi: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdziarz, M., Orzeł, S. and Weron, A., Option pricing in subdiffusive Bachelier model. J. Stat. Phys., 2011, 145, 187. doi: 10.1007/s10955-011-0310-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot, B.B., The variation of certain speculative prices. In Fractals and Scaling in Finance, pp. 371–418, 1997 ( Springer: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Matache, A.M., von Petersdorff, T. and Schwab, C., Fast deterministic pricing of options on Lévy driven assets. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 2004, 38, 37–71. doi: 10.1051/m2an:2004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melino, A. and Turnbull, S.M., The pricing of foreign currency options. Can. J. Econ., 1991, 24, 251–281. doi: 10.2307/135623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Brennan, M.J. and Schwartz, E.S., The valuation of American put options. J. Finance, 1977, 32, 449–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piterbarg, V., A stochastic volatility forward Libor model with a term structure of volatility smiles. Working Paper, Bank of America, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Piterbarg, V., Markovian projection method for volatility calibration, 2006. Available at SSRN 906473.
   Google Scholar
• Piterbarg, V.V., Stochastic volatility model with time-dependent skew. Appl. Math. Finance, 2005, 12, 147–185. doi: 10.1080/1350486042000297225
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, L.C.G., Monte Carlo valuation of American options. Math. Finance, 2002, 12, 271–286. doi: 10.1111/1467-9965.02010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachermayer, W. and Teichmann, J., How close are the option pricing formulas of Bachelier and Black–Merton–Scholes? Math. Finance, 2008, 18, 155–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.2007.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shun, Z. and McCullagh, P., Laplace approximation of high dimensional integrals. J. R. Stat. Soc. B (Methodol.), 1995, 54, 749–760.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, E.J. and Weithers, T.M., Louis Bachelier: The father of modern option pricing theory. J. Econ. Educ., 1991, 22, 165–171. doi: 10.1080/00220485.1991.10844704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, I.A., Option pricing model: Comparing Louis Bachelier with Black–Scholes Merton, 2016. Available at SSRN 2782719.
   Google Scholar
• Yosida, K., On the fundamental solution of the parabolic equation in a Riemannian space. Osaka Math. J., 1953, 5, 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Zanger, D.Z., Quantitative error estimates for a least-squares Monte Carlo algorithm for American option pricing. Finance Stoch., 2013, 17, 503–534. doi: 10.1007/s00780-013-0204-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanger, D.Z., Convergence of a least-squares Monte Carlo algorithm for American option pricing with dependent sample data. Math. Finance, 2018, 28, 447–479. doi: 10.1111/mafi.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar