Dynamic portfolio optimization with liquidity cost and market impact: a simulation-and-regression approach

References

• Aïd, R., Campi, L., Langrené, N. and Pham, H., A probabilistic numerical method for optimal multiple switching problems in high dimension. SIAM J. Financ. Math., 2014, 5(1), 191–231. doi: 10.1137/120897298
   Google Scholar
• Almgren, R. and Chriss, N., Optimal execution of portfolio transactions. J. Risk, 2000, 3(2), 5–39. doi: 10.21314/JOR.2001.041
   Google Scholar
• Almgren, R., Thum, C., Hauptmann, E. and Li, H., Equity market impact. Risk, 2005, 18, 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bertsimas, D. and Lo, A., Optimal control of execution costs. J. Financ. Markets, 1998, 1(1), 1–50. doi: 10.1016/S1386-4181(97)00012-8
   Google Scholar
• Boogert, A. and de Jong, C., Gas storage valuation using a Monte Carlo method. J. Derivatives, 2008, 15(3), 81–98. doi: 10.3905/jod.2008.702507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M., Goyal, A., Santa-Clara, P. and Stroud, J., A simulation approach to dynamic portfolio choice with an application to learning about return predictability. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2005, 18, 831–873. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhi019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. and Smith, J., Dynamic portfolio optimization with transaction costs: Heuristics and dual bounds. Manage. Sci., 2011, 57(10), 1752–1770. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriere, J., Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Insurance: Math. Econom., 1996, 19(1), 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çetin, U. and Rogers, L.C.G., Modeling liquidity effects in discrete time. Math. Financ., 2007, 17(1), 15–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.2007.00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin-Dufresne, P., Daniel, K.D., Moallemi, C.C. and Salam, M., Dynamic asset allocation with predictable returns and transaction costs. Working Paper, 2015. Available online at: SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2618910.
   Google Scholar
• Cong, F. and Oosterlee, C.W., Multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization based on Monte Carlo simulation. J. Econom. Dyn. Control, 2016, 64(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2016.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Cong, F. and Oosterlee, C.W., Accurate and robust numerical methods for the dynamic portfolio management problem. Comput. Econom., 2017, 49(3), 433–458. doi: 10.1007/s10614-016-9569-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. and Norman, A., Portfolio selection with transaction costs. Math. Oper. Res., 1990, 15(4), 676–713. doi: 10.1287/moor.15.4.676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denault, M. and Simonato, J.-G., Dynamic portfolio choices by simulation-and-regression: Revisiting the issue of value function vs portfolio weight recursions. Comput. Oper. Res., 2017, 79, 174–189. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaigi, M., Ly Vath, V., Mnif, M. and Toumi, S., Numerical approximation for a portfolio optimization problem under liquidity risk and costs. Appl. Math. Optim., 2016, 74(1), 163–195. doi: 10.1007/s00245-015-9311-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlappi, L. and Skoulakis, G., Numerical solutions to dynamic portfolio problems: The case for value function iteration using Taylor approximation. Comput. Econom., 2009, 33, 193–207. doi: 10.1007/s10614-008-9156-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlappi, L. and Skoulakis, G., Solving consumption and portfolio choice problems: The state variable decomposition method. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2010, 23, 3346–3400. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhq045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gârleanu, N. and Pedersen, L.H., Dynamic trading with predictable returns and transaction costs. J. Finance, 2013, 68, 2309–2340. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S. and Oosterlee, C.W., The stochastic grid bundling method: Efficient pricing of Bermudan options and their Greeks. Appl. Math. Comput., 2015, 269(1), 412–431.
   Google Scholar
• Kharroubi, I., Langrené, N. and Pham, H., A numerical algorithm for fully nonlinear HJB equations: An approach by control randomization. Monte Carlo Methods Appl., 2014, 20(2), 145–165. doi: 10.1515/mcma-2013-0024
   Google Scholar
• Lim, A. and Wimonkittiwat, P., Dynamic portfolio selection with market impact costs. Oper. Res. Lett., 2014, 42(5), 299–306. doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2014.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Optimal consumption and investment with transaction costs and multiple risky assets. J. Finance, 2004, 59(1), 289–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longstaff, F. and Schwartz, E., Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Finance. Stud., 2001, 14(1), 681–692. doi: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly Vath, V., Mnif, M. and Pham, H., A model of optimal portfolio selection under liquidity risk and price impact. Finance Stoch., 2007, 11(1), 51–90. doi: 10.1007/s00780-006-0025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, A.W. and Tan, S., Multiple risky assets, transaction costs and return predictability: Allocation rules and implication for U.S. investors. J. Finance. Quant. Anal., 2010, 45(4), 1015–1053. doi: 10.1017/S0022109010000360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J., Song, Q. and Zhang, J., Optimal portfolio selection under concave price impact. Appl. Math. Optim., 2013, 67(3), 353–390. doi: 10.1007/s00245-013-9191-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, X., DeMiguel, V. and Nogales, F.J., Multiperiod portfolio optimization with multiple risky assets and general transaction costs. J. Bank. Financ., 2016, 69, 108–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous-time case. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1969, 51(3), 247–257. doi: 10.2307/1926560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J. Econ. Theory., 1971, 3, 373–413. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(71)90038-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossin, J., Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies. J. Bus., 1968, 41(2), 215–229. doi: 10.1086/295078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthuraman, K. and Zha, H., Simulation-based portfolio optimization for large portfolios with transaction costs. Math. Finance, 2008, 18(1), 115–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.2007.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obizhaeva, A.A. and Wang, J., Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics. J. Finance. Markets, 2013, 16(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P., Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Rev. Econom. Stat., 1969, 51, 239–46. doi: 10.2307/1926559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreve, S.E. and Soner, H.M., Optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs. Ann. Appl. Probab., 1994, 4(3), 609–692. doi: 10.1214/aoap/1177004966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., Rood, R. and Oosterlee, C., Efficient portfolio valuation incorporating liquidity risk. Quant. Finance, 2013, 13(10), 1575–1586. doi: 10.1080/14697688.2013.779013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsitsiklis, J. and Van Roy, B., Regression methods for pricing complex American-style options. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 2001, 12(4), 694–703. doi: 10.1109/72.935083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukalas, G., Wang, J. and Giesecke, K., Dynamic portfolio execution. Manage. Sci., 2017, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Van Binsbergen, J.H. and Brandt, M., Solving dynamic portfolio choice problems by recursing on optimized portfolio weights or on the value function?. Comput. Econom., 2007, 29, 355–367. doi: 10.1007/s10614-006-9073-z
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., Langrené, N., Tian, Y., Zhu, Z., Klebaner, F. and Hamza, K., Local control regression: Improving the least squares Monte Carlo method for portfolio optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11467, 2018.
   Google Scholar