Deep learning volatility: a deep neural network perspective on pricing and calibration in (rough) volatility models

References

• Alòs, E., León, J. and Vives, J., On the short-time behavior of the implied volatility for jump-diffusion models with stochastic volatility. Financ. Stoch., 2007, 11(4), 571–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alòs, E., García-Lorite, D. and Muguruza, A., On smile properties of volatility derivatives and exotic products: Understanding the VIX skew. arXiv:1808.03610, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Antonov, A., Konikov, M. and Spector, M., SABR spreads its wings. Risk, 2013 (August), 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Avellaneda, M., Carelli, A. and Stella, F., Following the Bayes path to option pricing. J. Comput. Intell. Financ., 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, A.R., Approximation and estimation bounds for artificial neural networks. Mach. Learn., 1994, 14(1), 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, C., Friz, P. and Gatheral, J., Pricing under rough volatility. Quant. Finance, 2016, 16(6), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, C., Friz, P., Gassiat, P., Martin, J. and Stemper, B., A regularity structure for rough volatility. arXiv:1710.07481, 2017a.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, C., Friz, P., Gulisashvili, A., Horvath, B. and Stemper, B., Short-time near the money skew in rough fractional stochastic volatility models. arXiv:1703.05132, 2017b.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, C., Horvath, B., Muguruza, A., Stemper, B. and Tomas, M., On deep calibration of (rough) stochastic volatility models. Preprint, arXiv:1908.08806, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, C. and Stemper, B. Deep calibration of rough stochastic volatility models. Preprint, arXiv:1810.03399, October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bennedsen, M., Lunde, A. and Pakkanen, M.S., Hybrid scheme for Brownian semistationary processes. Financ. Stoch., 2017, 21(4), 931–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergomi, L., Stochastic Volatility Modeling. Chapman & Hall/CRC financial mathematical series, 2015 (Chapman & Hall/CRC).
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, H., Gonon, L., Teichmann, J. and Wood, B., Deep hedging. Preprint, arXiv:1802.03042, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Osterlee, C.W. and Van Der Weide, H., Efficient unbiased simulation scheme for the SABR stochastic volatility model, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• De Spiegeleer, J., Madan, D., Reyners, S. and Schoutens, W., Machine learning for quantitative finance: Fast derivative pricing, hedging and fitting. SSRN:3191050, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitroff, G., Röder, D. and Fries, C.P., Volatility model calibration with convolutional neural networks. Preprint, SSRN:3252432, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Doléans-Dade, C., Quelques applications de la formule de changement de variables pour les semimartingales. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verwandte Gebiete, 1970, 16(3), 181–194.
   Google Scholar
• El Euch, O. and Rosenbaum, M., The characteristic function of rough Heston models. To appear in Mathematical Finance.
   Google Scholar
• El Euch, O. and Rosenbaum, M., Perfect hedging in rough Heston models, to appear in The Annals of Applied Probability, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Eldan, R. and Shamir, O., The power of depth for feedforward neural networks. JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceedings, Vol. 49, pp. 1–34, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. and Green, A., Deeply learning derivatives. Preprint arXiv:1809.02233, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fukasawa, M., Asymptotic analysis for stochastic volatility: Martingale expansion. Financ. Stoch., 2011, 15(4), 635–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatheral, J., A parsimonious arbitrage-free implied volatility parameterization with application to the valuation of volatility derivatives. Presentation at Global Derivatives, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gatheral, J. and Jacquier, A., Arbitrage-free SVI volatility surfaces. Quant. Finance, 2014, 14(1), 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatheral, J., Jaisson, T. and Rosenbaum, M., Volatility is rough. Quant. Finance, 2018, 18(6), 933–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A., Deep Learning, 2016 (MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gulisashvili, A., Horvath, B. and Jacquier, A., On the probability of hitting the boundary for Brownian motions on the SABR plane. Electron. Commun. Probab., 2016, 21(75), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gulisashvili, A., Horvath, B. and Jacquier, A., Mass at zero in the uncorrelated SABR model. Quant. Finance, 2018, 18(10), 1753–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, P., Kumar, D., Lesniewski, A. and Woodward, D., Managing smile risk. Wilmott Mag., 2002, (September), 84–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, P., Lesniewski, A. and Woodward, D., Probability distribution in the SABR model of stochastic volatility. In Large Deviations and Asymptotic Methods in Finance. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 110, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, S. and Martini, C., The extended SSVI volatility surface. Preprint, SSRN:2971502, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, A., Model calibration with neural networks. Risk, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hornik, K., Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw., 1991, 4(2), 251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M. and White, H., Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw., 1989, 2(5), 359–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M. and White, H., Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw., 1990, 3(5), 551.560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, B. and Reichmann, O., Dirichlet forms and finite element methods for the SABR model. SIAM J. Financ. Math., May 2018, 9(2), 716–754.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, B., Jacquier, A. and Lacombe, C., Asymptotic behaviour of randomised fractional volatility models. arXiv:1708.01121, 2017a.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, B., Jacquier, A. and Muguruza, A., Functional central limit theorems for rough volatility. arXiv:1711.03078, 2017b.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J.M., Lo, A.W. and Poggio, T., A nonparametric approach to pricing and hedging derivative securities via learning networks. J. Financ., 1994, 49(3), 851–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquier, A., Martini, C. and Muguruza, A., On VIX futures in the rough Bergomi model. Quant. Finance, 2018a, 18(1), 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquier, A., Pakkanen, M. and Stone, H., Pathwise large deviations for the rough Bergomi model. J. Appl. Probab., 2018b, 55(4), 1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioffe, S. and Szegedy, C., Batch normalisation: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. Preprint, arXiv:1502.03167, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kienitz, J. and Wetterau, D., Financial Modelling: Theory, Implementation and Practice, 2013 (Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Kondratyev, A., Curve dynamics with artificial neural networks. Risk, May 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, D., A Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming. DFVLR-FB, pp. 88–28, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Leitao Rodriguez, A., Grzelak, L.A. and Oosterlee, C.W., On an efficient multiple time step Monte Carlo simulation of the SABR model. Quant. Finance, 2017, 17(10), 1549–1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenberg, K., A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quart. Appl. Math., 1944, 2, 164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, D., An algorithm for least-Squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 1963, 11(2), 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, W.A., An artificial neural network representation of the SABR stochastic volatility model. Preprint SSRN:3288882, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mhaskar, H.N., Approximation properties of a multilayered feedforward artificial neural network. Adv. Comput. Math., 1993, 1(1), 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., A simplex method for function minimization. Comp. J., 1965, 7, 308–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocedal, J. and Wright, S., Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering, 2006 (Springer-Verlag: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M.J.D., A direct search optimization method that models the objective and constraint functions by linear interpolation. In Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, edited by S. Gomez and J.-P. Hennart, pp. 51–67, 1994 (Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht).
   Google Scholar
• Rios, L.M. and Sahinidis, N.V., Derivative-free optimization: A review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations. J. Global Optim., 2013, 56(3), 1247–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoutens, W., Simons, E. and Tistaert, J., A perfect calibration! Now what? Wilmott Mag., March 2004, 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Shaham, U., Cloninger, A. and Coifman, R.R., Provable approximation properties for deep neural networks. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 2018, 44(3), 537–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storn, R. and Price, K., A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim., 1997, 11(4), 341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., Byrd, R.H. and Nocedal, J., L-BFGS-B: Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B, FORTRAN routines for large scale bound constrained optimization. ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 1997, 23(4), 550–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar