Vulnerability-CoVaR: investigating the crypto-market

References

• Acharya, V.V., Pedersen, L.H., Philippon, T. and Richardson, M., Measuring systemic risk. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2017, 30, 2–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adrian, T. and Brunnermeier, M.K., CoVaR. Am. Econ. Rev., 2016, 106, 1705–1741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballis, A. and Drakos, K., Testing for herding in the cryptocurrency market. Finance Res. Lett., 2020, 33, 101210.
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Global systemically important banks: Updated assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Designing a prudential treatment for crypto-assets. Discussion paper, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, S., Colliard, J.-E., Hurlin, C. and Pérignon, C., Where the risks lie: A survey on systemic risk. Rev. Finance, 2017, 21, 109–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, M., Maruotti, A. and Petrella, L., Multiple risk measures for multivariate dynamic heavy-tailed models. J. Empir. Finance, 2017, 43, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, M., Durante, F., Jaworski, P., Petrella, L. and Salvadori, G., Conditional risk based on multivariate hazard scenarios. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk. Assess., 2018, 32, 203–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, M., Cerqueti, R. and Palestini, A., Allocation of risk capital in a cost cooperative game induced by a modified expected shortfall. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 2019, 0, 0–0.
   Google Scholar
• Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A.W. and Valavanis, S., A survey of systemic risk analytics. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ., 2012, 4, 255–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccolto, G., Borri, N. and Consiglio, A., Breakup and default risks in the great lockdown. J. Bank Finance, 2021, 106308. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106308
   Google Scholar
• Borri, N., Conditional tail-risk in cryptocurrency markets. J. Empir. Finance, 2019, 50, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouri, E., Gupta, R. and Roubaud, D., Herding behaviour in cryptocurrencies. Finance Res. Lett., 2019, 29, 216–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlees, C. and Engle, R.F., SRISK: A conditional capital shortfall measure of systemic risk. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2017, 30, 48–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., Multi-CoVaR and Shapley value: A systemic risk measure. Working paper, Banque de France DSF-SMF, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chaim, P. and Laurini, M.P., Volatility and return jumps in bitcoin. Econ. Lett., 2018, 173, 158–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E.C., Cheng, J.W. and Khorana, A., An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: An international perspective. J. Bank. Financ., 2000, 24, 1651–1679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, T.C. and Zheng, D., An empirical analysis of herd behavior in global stock markets. J. Bank. Financ., 2010, 34, 1911–1921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A. and Yarovaya, L., Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 2019, 62, 182–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bernardino, E., Fernández-Ponce, J.M., Palacios-Rodríguez, F. and Rodríguez-Griñolo, M.R., On multivariate extensions of the conditional value-at-risk measure. Insur. Math. Econ., 2015, 61, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebold, F.X. and Yilmaz, K., Trans-Atlantic equity volatility connectedness: US and European financial institutions, 2004–2014. J. Financ. Econom., 2015, 14, 81–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eling, M. and Toplek, D., Modeling and management of nonlinear dependencies-copulas in dynamic financial analysis. J. Risk Insur., 2009, 76, 651–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.F., Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 2002, 20, 339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F., Ventre, C., Basios, M., Kanthan, L., Martinez-Rego, D., Wu, F. and Li, L., Cryptocurrency trading: A comprehensive survey. Financial Innov., 2022, 8, 1–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, C. and Steel, M.F., On bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1998, 93, 359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges, P., Lamy, A.-G., Nicolas, E., Quibel, G. and Roncalli, T., Multivariate survival modelling: A unified approach with copulas. Working Paper, 2001.doi:10.2139/ssrn.1032559
   Google Scholar
• Ghalanos, A., rugarch: Univariate GARCH models, R package version 1.4-4, 2020. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=rugarch (accessed 13 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Girardi, G. and Ergün, A.T., Systemic risk measurement: Multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. J. Bank. Financ., 2013, 37, 3169–3180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudici, G., Milne, A. and Vinogradov, D., Cryptocurrencies: Market analysis and perspectives. J. Ind. Bus. Econ., 2020, 47, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D.E., On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J. Finance, 1993, 48, 1779–1801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härdle, W.K., Wang, W. and Yu, L., TENET: Tail-event driven NETwork risk. J. Econom., 2016, 192, 499–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. and Salmon, M., Market stress and herding. J. Empir. Finance, 2004, 11, 585–616.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C.K.M. and Roubaud, D., Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 2019, 63, 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X., Large portfolio risk management with dynamic copulas. Technical report, McGill University, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Joe, H., Dependence Modeling with Copulas, 2014 (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL).
   Google Scholar
• Kallinterakis, V. and Wang, Y., Do investors herd in cryptocurrencies—and why? Res. Int. Bus. Finance, 2019, 50, 240–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimalis, E.N. and Nomikos, N.K., Measuring systemic risk in the European banking sector: A copula CoVaR approach. Eur. J. Finance, 2018, 24, 944–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsiampa, P., Corbet, S. and Lucey, B., Volatility spillover effects in leading cryptocurrencies: A BEKK-MGARCH analysis. Finance Res. Lett., 2019, 29, 68–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker, R. and Bassett Jr, G., Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 1978, 46, 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojadinovic, I. and Yan, J., Modeling multivariate distributions with continuous margins using the copula R package. J. Stat. Softw., 2010, 34, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutmos, D., Return and volatility spillovers among cryptocurrencies. Econ. Lett., 2018, 173, 122–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuester, K., Mittnik, S. and Paolella, M.S., Value-at-risk prediction: A comparison of alternative strategies. J. Financ. Econom., 2006, 4, 53–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kupiec, P., Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. J. Deriv., 1995, 3, 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriazis, N.A., A survey on empirical findings about spillovers in cryptocurrency markets. J. Risk Financ. Manag., 2019, 12, 170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriazis, N.A., Herding behaviour in digital currency markets: An integrated survey and empirical estimation. Heliyon, 2020, 6, e04752.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, Z., Wang, Y. and Huang, Z., Risk connectedness heterogeneity in the cryptocurrency markets. Front. Phys., 2020, 8, 243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu Duc Huynh, T., Spillover risks on cryptocurrency markets: A look from VAR-SVAR Granger causality and student's t copulas. J. Risk Financ. Manag., 2019, 12, 52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lux, T. and Papapantoleon, A., Improved Fréchet–Hoeffding bounds on d-copulas and applications in model-free finance. Ann. Appl. Probab., 2017, 27, 3633–3671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainik, G. and Schaanning, E., On dependence consistency of CoVaRand some other systemic risk measures. Stat. Risk Model., 2014, 31, 49–77.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen, R.B., An Introduction to Copulas, 2006 (Springer Science & Business Media: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Oehlert, G.W., A note on the delta method. Am. Stat., 1992, 46, 27–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okhrin, O. and Ristig, A., Hierarchical archimedean copulae: The HAC package. J. Stat. Softw., 2014, 58, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okhrin, O., Okhrin, Y. and Schmid, W., On the structure and estimation of hierarchical Archimedean copulas. J. Econom., 2013, 173, 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, A.J., Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. Int. Econ. Rev., 2006, 47, 527–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petukhina, A., Trimborn, S., Härdle, W.K. and Elendner, H., Investing with cryptocurrencies—evaluating their potential for portfolio allocation strategies. Quant. Finance, 2021, 21, 1825–1853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillip, A., Chan, J.S. and Peiris, S., A new look at cryptocurrencies. Econ. Lett., 2018, 163, 6–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reboredo, J.C. and Ugolini, A., Systemic risk in European sovereign debt markets: A CoVaR-copula approach. J. Int. Money. Finance, 2015, 51, 214–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar, A., Fonctions de répartition à n dimension et leurs marges. Publications de l'Institut de Statistique de l'Université de Paris, 1959, 8, 299–231.
   Google Scholar
• Smales, L.A., One cryptocurrency to explain them all? Understanding the importance of Bitcoin in cryptocurrency returns. Econ. Pap. Spec. Sect.: Econ. Blockchain Technol., 2020, 39, 118–132.
   Google Scholar
• Stavroyiannis, S. and Babalos, V., Herding, faith-based investments and the global financial crisis: Empirical evidence from static and dynamic models. J. Behav. Finance, 2017, 18, 478–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczygielski, J.J., Karathanasopoulos, A. and Zaremba, A., One shape fits all? A comprehensive examination of cryptocurrency return distributions. Appl. Econ. Lett., 2020, 27, 1567–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, A.K., Adewuyi, A.O., Albulescu, C.T. and Wohar, M.E., Empirical evidence of extreme dependence and contagion risk between main cryptocurrencies. North Am. J. Econ. Finance, 2020, 51, 101083.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, K.P. and Yang, Z., The market for bitcoin transactions. J. Int. Financial Mark. Inst. Money, 2021, 71, 101282.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal-Tomás, D., An investigation of cryptocurrency data: The market that never sleeps. Quant. Finance, 2021, 21, 2007–2024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Tomás, D., Ibáñez, A.M. and Farinós, J.E., Herding in the cryptocurrency market: CSSD and CSAD approaches. Finance Res. Lett., 2019, 30, 181–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., Zhang, Y. and Zhang, Z., Tail-risk spillovers in cryptocurrency markets. Finance Res. Lett., 2021, 38, 101453.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Wang, P., Li, X. and Shen, D., Some stylized facts of the cryptocurrency market. Appl. Econ., 2018, 50, 5950–5965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Are banks too big to fail? Measuring systemic importance of financial institutions. Int. J. Central Bank., 2010, 6, 205–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar