Optimal multi-period transaction-cost-aware long-only portfolios and time consistency in efficiency

References

• Basak, S. and Chabakauri, G., Dynamic mean–variance asset allocation. Rev. Finan. Stud., 2010, 23, 2970–3016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäuerle, N. and Grether, S., Complete markets do not allow free cash flow streams. Math. Methods Oper. Res., 2015, 81, 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielecki, T.R., Jin, H., Pliska, S.R. and Zhou, X.Y., Continuous-time mean–variance portfolio selection with bankruptcy prohibition. Math. Finance, 2005, 15, 213–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, T. and Murgoci, A., A theory of Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control in discrete time. Finance Stoch., 2014, 18, 545–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, P.P. and Lin, X., Optimal portfolio selection with transaction costs. N. Am. Actuar. J., 1997, 1, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D.B. and Smith, J.E., Dynamic portfolio optimization with transaction costs: Heuristics and dual bounds. Manage. Sci., 2011, 57, 1752–1770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. and Dai, M., Characterization of optimal strategy for multiasset investment and consumption with transaction costs. SIAM J. Financial Math., 2013, 4, 857–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M.C., Pun, C.S. and Wong, H.Y., Big data challenges of high-dimensional continuous-time mean–variance portfolio selection and a remedy. Risk. Anal., 2017, 37, 1532–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, G.M., Multiperiod consumption and investment behavior with convex transactions costs. Manage. Sci., 1979, 25, 1127–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, G.M., Capital market equilibrium with transaction costs. J. Political Econ., 1986, 94, 842–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, X., Gao, J., Li, X. and Li, D., Optimal multi-period mean–variance policy under no-shorting constraint. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2014, 234, 459–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, X., Li, D. and Li, X., Mean–variance policy for discrete-time cone constrained markets: The consistency in efficiency and minimum-variance signed supermartingale measure. Math. Finance, 2017, 27, 471–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, X., Li, D., Wang, S. and Zhu, S., Better than dynamic mean–variance: Time inconsistency and free cash flow stream. Math. Finance, 2012, 22, 346–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czichowsky, C. and Schweizer, M., Cone-constrained continuous-time Markowitz problems. Ann. Appl. Probab., 2013, 23, 764–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, M., Xu, Z.Q. and Zhou, X.Y., Continuous-time Markowitz's model with transaction costs. SIAM J. Financial Math., 2010, 1, 96–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M.H.A. and Norman, A.R., Portfolio selection with transaction costs. Math. Oper. Res., 1990, 15, 676–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Nogales, F.J. and Uppal, R., A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Manage. Sci., 2009, 55, 798–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L. and Uppal, R., Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financial Stud., 2009, 22, 1915–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouque, J.P., Pun, C.S. and Wong, H.Y., Portfolio optimization with ambiguous correlation and stochastic volatilities. SIAM J. Control Optim., 2016, 54, 2309–2338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gârleanu, N. and Pedersen, L.H., Dynamic trading with predictable returns and transaction costs. J. Finance., 2013, 68, 2309–2340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gârleanu, N. and Pedersen, L.H., Dynamic portfolio choice with frictions. J. Econ. Theory., 2016, 165, 487–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennotte, G. and Jung, A., Investment strategies under transaction costs: The finite horizon case. Manage. Sci., 1994, 40, 385–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S.M., Consistent plans. Rev. Econ. Stud., 1980, 47, 533–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., Gu, J.W. and Ching, W.K., Adaptive online portfolio selection with transaction costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2021, 295, 1074–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, R. and Ma, T., Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps. J. Finance., 2003, 58, 1651–1683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karoui, N.E., Peng, S. and Quenez, M.C., Backward stochastic differential equations in finance. Math. Finance, 1997, 7, 1–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolm, P.N., Tütüncü, R. and Fabozzi, F.J., 60 years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2014, 234, 356–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T.L., Xing, H. and Chen, Z., Mean–variance portfolio optimization when means and covariances are unknown. Ann. Appl. Stat., 2011, 5, 798–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. and Ng, W.L., Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: Multiperiod mean–variance formulation. Math. Finance, 2000, 10, 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Uysal, A.S. and Mulvey, J.M., Multi-period portfolio optimization using model predictive control with mean–variance and risk parity frameworks. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2021, 299, 1158–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zhou, X.Y. and Lim, A.E.B., Dynamic mean–variance portfolio selection with no-shorting constraints. SIAM J. Control Optim., 2002, 40, 1540–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, A.E.B. and Zhou, X.Y., Mean–variance portfolio selection with random parameters in a complete market. Math. Oper. Res., 2002, 27, 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. and Loewenstein, M., Optimal portfolio selection with transaction costs and finite horizons. Rev. Financial Stud., 2002, 15, 805–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magill, M.J. and Constantinides, G.M., Portfolio selection with transactions costs. J. Econ. Theory., 1976, 13, 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H., Portfolio selection. J. Finance., 1952, 7, 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, X., DeMiguel, V. and Nogales, F.J., Multiperiod portfolio optimization with multiple risky assets and general transaction costs. J. Bank. Finance, 2016, 69, 108–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1969, 51, 247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J. Econ. Theory., 1971, 3, 373–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., An analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. J. Financial Quant. Anal., 1972, 7, 1851–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud, R.O., The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is ‘Optimized’ optimal? Financial Anal. J., 1989, 45, 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, J.M., Sun, Y., Wang, M. and Ye, J., Optimizing a portfolio of mean-reverting assets with transaction costs via a feedforward neural network. Quant. Finance, 2020, 20, 1239–1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mynbayeva, E., Lamb, J.D. and Zhao, Y., Why estimation alone causes Markowitz portfolio selection to fail and what we might do about it. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2021, 301, 694–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivares-Nadal, A.V. and DeMiguel, V., Technical note–a robust perspective on transaction costs in portfolio optimization. Oper. Res., 2018, 66, 733–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palczewski, J., Poulsen, R., Schenk-Hoppé, K.R. and Wang, H., Dynamic portfolio optimization with transaction costs and state-dependent drift. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2015, 243, 921–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, C.S., Robust time-inconsistent stochastic control problems. Automatica, 2018a, 94, 249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, C.S., Time-consistent mean-variance portfolio selection with only risky assets. Econ. Model., 2018b, 75, 281–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, C.S., G-expected utility maximization with ambiguous equicorrelation. Quant. Finance, 2021, 21, 403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, C.S. and Wang, L., A cost-effective approach to portfolio construction with range-based risk measures. Quant. Finance, 2021, 21, 431–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, C.S. and Wong, H.Y., A linear programming model for selection of sparse high-dimensional multiperiod portfolios. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2019, 273, 754–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pun, C.S. and Ye, Z., Optimal dynamic mean–variance portfolio subject to proportional transaction costs and no-shorting constraint. Automatica, 2022, 135, 109986.
   Google Scholar
• Strotz, R.H., Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud., 1955, 23, 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X.Y. and Li, D., Continuous-time mean–variance portfolio selection: A stochastic LQ framework. Appl. Math. Optim., 2000, 42, 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar