Assessing the accuracy of exponentially weighted moving average models for Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of crypto portfolios

References

• Aas, K. and Haff, I.H., The generalized hyperbolic skew Student-t distribution. J. Financ. Econom., 2006, 4(2), 275–309.
   Google Scholar
• Acereda, B., Leon, A. and Mora, J., Estimating the expected shortfall of cryptocurrencies: An evaluation based on backtesting. Finance Res. Lett., 2020, 33, 101181.
   Google Scholar
• Aielli, G.P., Dynamic conditional correlation: On properties and estimation. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 2013, 31(3), 282–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Khazali, O., Bouri, E. and Roubaud, D., The impact of positive and negative macroeconomic news surprises: Gold versus bitcoin. Econ. Bulletin, 2018, 38(1), 373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Yahyaee, K., Mensi, W., Al-Jarrah, I., Hamdi, A. and Kang, S., Volatility forecasting, downside risk, and diversification benefits of bitcoin and oil and international commodity markets: A comparative analysis with yellow metal. North American J. Econ. Finance, 2019, 49, 104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., Market Risk Analysis: Value-at-Risk Models, 2008 (John Wiley and Sons: Chichester).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. and Dakos, M., A critical investigation of cryptocurrency data and analysis. Quant. Finance, 2020, 20(2), 173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, T.G. and Bollerslev, T., Intraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets. J. Empir. Finance, 1997, 4(2-3), 115–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ardia, D., Bluteau, K. and Rüede, M., Regime changes in bitcoin GARCH volatility dynamics. Finance Res. Lett., 2019, 29, 266–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardia, D., Boudt, K. and Gagnon-Fleury, J.-P., RiskPortfolios: Computation of risk-based portfolios in R. J. Open Source Softw., 2017, 2(10), 171.
   Google Scholar
• Avramov, D., Chordia, T. and Goyal, A., The impact of trades on daily volatility. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2006, 19(4), 1241–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basel Committee, Supervisory framework for the use of backtesting in conjunction with the internal models approach to market risk capital requirements. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 1996. Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs22.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee, Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2012. Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs219.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Baur, D., Dimpfl, T. and Kuck, K., Bitcoin, gold and the US dollar: A replication and extension. Finance Res. Lett., 2018, 25, 103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens, L. and Storti, G., A component GARCH model with time varying weights. Stud. Nonlinear Dyn. Econom., 2009, 13(2), 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, S. and Dimitriadis, T., Regression-based expected shortfall backtesting. J. Financ. Econom., 2020, 20, 437–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazán-Palomino, W., Bitcoin and its offspring: A volatility risk approach. In Advanced Studies of Financial Technologies and Cryptocurrency Markets, edited by L. Pichl, C. Eom, E. Scalas and T. Kaizoji, pp. 233–256, 2020 (Springer: Singapore).
   Google Scholar
• Bollerslev, T., Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econom., 1986, 31(3), 307–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonello, A. and Suda, D., Volatility regime analysis of bitcoin price dynamics using Markov-switching GARCH models. In Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference 2018, pp. 213–218, 2018 (Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, University of Gent: Gent). https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8593929
   Google Scholar
• Bouoiyour, J. and Selmi, R., Commodity price uncertainty and manufactured exports in Morocco and Tunisia: Some insights from a novel GARCH model. Econ. Bulletin, 2014, 34(1), 220–233.
   Google Scholar
• Bouoiyour, J. and Selmi, R., Bitcoin: A beginning of a new phase? Econ. Bulletin, 2016, 36(3), 1430–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouri, E., Molnar, P., Azzi, G., Roubaud, D. and Hagfors, L., On the hedge and safe haven properties of bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier? Finance Res. Lett., 2017, 20, 192–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, C., Bitcoin price volatility reached a 14-month high in June. Forbes, 2021. Available at: https://bit.ly/3zLZtXw.
   Google Scholar
• Caporale, G. and Zekokh, T., Modelling volatility of cryptocurrencies using Markov-switching GARCH models. Res. Int. Bus. Finance, 2019, 48, 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappiello, L., Engle, R.F. and Sheppard, K., Asymmetric dynamics in the correlations of global equity and bond returns. J. Financ. Econom., 2006, 4(4), 537–572.
   Google Scholar
• Catania, L. and Grassi, S., Forecasting cryptocurrency volatility. Int. J. Forecast., 2021, 38, 878–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catania, L., Grassi, S. and Ravazzolo, F., Forecasting cryptocurrencies under model and parameter instability. Int. J. Forecast., 2019, 35(2), 485–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.W., Watanabe, T. and Lin, E.M., Bayesian estimation of realized GARCH-type models with application to financial tail risk management. Econom. Statistics, 2021. Article in Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306221000484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christoffersen, P., Evaluating interval forecasts. Int. Econ. Rev. (Philadelphia), 1998, 39(4), 841–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J., Chan, S., Nadarajah, S. and Osterrieder, J., GARCH modelling of cryptocurrencies. J. Risk Financ. Manage., 2017, 10(4), 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, S., Costanzino, N. and Curran, M., Empirical performance of backtesting methods for expected shortfall. SSRN Discussion Paper 2618345, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Peat, M. and Vigne, S., Bitcoin futures: What use are they? Econ. Lett., 2018, 172, 23–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzino, N. and Curran, M., Backtesting general spectral risk measures with application to expected shortfall. SSRN Discussion Paper 2514403, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Costanzino, N. and Curran, M., A simple traffic light approach to backtesting expected shortfall. Risks, 2018, 6(1), 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creal, D., Koopman, S.J. and Lucas, A., Generalized autoregressive score models with applications. J. Appl. Econom., 2013, 28(5), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R.S., Comparing predictive accuracy. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 1995, 13(3), 253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Z., Granger, C. and Engle, R., A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. J. Empir. Finance, 1993, 1(1), 83–106.
   Google Scholar
• Dyhrberg, A., Bitcoin, gold and the dollar—A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Res. Lett., 2016, 16, 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R., Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 2002, 20(3), 339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R., Ghysels, E. and Sohn, B., Stock market volatility and macroeconomic fundamentals. Rev. Econ. Stat., 2013, 95(3), 776–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. and Manganelli, S., CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 2004, 22(4), 367–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.F., Focardi, S.M. and Fabozzi, F.J., ARCH/GARCH models in applied financial econometrics. In Encyclopedia of Financial Models, edited by F.J. Fabozzi, 2012 (John Wiley and Sons). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118182635.efm0062
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R.F. and Kroner, K.F., Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econ. Theory., 1995, 11(1), 122–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.F. and Lee, G., A Long-Run and Short-Run Component Model of Stock Return Volatility, 1999 (Oxford University Press: Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R.F. and Ng, V.K., Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. J. Finance, 1993, 48(5), 1749–1778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantazzini, D. and Zimin, S., A multivariate approach for the simultaneous modelling of market risk and credit risk for cryptocurrencies. J. Ind. Bus. Econ., 2020, 47(1), 19–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fasiolo, M., An introduction to mvnfast. R package version 0.1.6., 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fissler, T. and Ziegel, J.F., Higher order elicitability and Osband's principle. Ann. Statist., 2016, 44(4), 1680–1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghalanos, A., Rmgarch: Multivariate GARCH models. R package version 1.3-7., 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ghalanos, A., Rugarch: Univariate GARCH models. R package version 1.4-4., 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D.E., On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J. Finance, 1993, 48(5), 1779–1801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A.E., Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 2007, 102(477), 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneiting, T. and Ranjan, R., Comparing density forecasts using threshold- and quantile-weighted scoring rules. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 2011, 29(3), 411–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guesmi, K., Saadi, S., Abid, I. and Ftiti, Z., Portfolio diversification with virtual currency: Evidence from bitcoin. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 2019, 63, 431–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P., Lunde, A. and Nason, J., The model confidence set. Econometrica, 2011, 79(2), 453–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P.R., Huang, Z. and Shek, H.H., Realized GARCH: A joint model for returns and realized measures of volatility. J. Appl. Econom., 2012, 27(6), 877–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori, T., A forecast comparison of volatility models using realized volatility: Evidence from the bitcoin market. Appl. Econ. Lett., 2020, 27(7), 591–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentschel, L., All in the family: Nesting symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models. J. Financ. Econ., 1995, 39(1), 71–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M.L. and Bera, A.K., A class of non-linear ARCH models. Int. Econ. Rev. (Philadelphia), 1992, 33(1), 137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Krüger, F. and Lerch, S., Evaluating probabilistic forecasts with scoringRules. J. Stat. Softw., 2019, 90(12), 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsiampa, P., Volatility estimation for bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Econ. Lett., 2017, 158, 3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köchling, G., Schmidtke, P. and Posch, P., Volatility forecasting accuracy for bitcoin. Econ. Lett., 2020, 191, 108836.
   Google Scholar
• Kratz, M., Lok, Y.H. and McNeil, A.J., Multinomial VaR backtests: A simple implicit approach to backtesting expected shortfall. J. Bank. Finance, 2018, 88, 393–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupiec, P., Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. J. Derivatives, 1995, 3(2), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Semeyutin, A., Lau, C.K.M. and Gozgor, G., Forecasting value-at-risk of cryptocurrencies with riskmetrics-type models. Res. Int. Bus. Finance, 2020, 54, 101259.
   Google Scholar
• Longerstaey, J. and Spencer, M., RiskMetrics—Technical Document. J. P. Morgan/Reuters, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• López-Cabarcos, M., Pérez-Pico, A., Piñeiro Chousa, J. and Šević, A., Bitcoin volatility, stock market and investor sentiment. Are they connected? Finance Res. Lett., 2020, 38, 101399.
   Google Scholar
• Maciel, L., Cryptocurrencies value-at-risk and expected shortfall: Do regime-switching volatility models improve forecasting? Int. J. Finance Econ., 2021, 26(3), 4840–4855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, J.E. and Winkler, R.L., Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions. Manage. Sci., 1976, 22(10), 1087–1096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matkovskyy, R., Jalan, A. and Dowling, M., Effects of economic policy uncertainty shocks on the interdependence between bitcoin and traditional financial markets. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance, 2020, 77, 150–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D.G. and Kambouroudis, D., Are riskmetrics forecasts good enough? Evidence from 31 stock markets. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 2009, 18(3), 117–124.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, A. and Frey, R., Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: An extreme value approach. J. Empir. Finance, 2000, 7(3-4), 271–300.
   Google Scholar
• Mincer, J.A. and Zarnowitz, V., The evaluation of economic forecasts. In Economic Forecasts and Expectations: Analysis of Forecasting Behavior and Performance, pp. 3–46, 1969 (NBER). https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/nbrnberbk/minc69-1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nekhili, R. and Sultan, J., Jump-driven risk model performance in cryptocurrency market. Int. J. Financ. Stud., 2020, 8(2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D.B., Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 1991, 59(2), 347–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pafka, S. and Kondor, I., Evaluating the riskmetrics methodology in measuring volatility and value-at-risk in financial markets. Physica A: Statist. Mechan. Appl., 2001, 299(1-2), 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, A.J., Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies. J. Econom., 2011, 160(1), 246–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, R.Y., Optimization of computer simulation models with rare events. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1997, 99(1), 89–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwert, G.W., Stock volatility and the crash of '87. Rev. Financ. Stud., 1990, 3(1), 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segnon, M. and Bekiros, S., Forecasting volatility in bitcoin market. Ann. Finance, 2020, 16, 435–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silahli, B., Dingec, K., Cifter, A. and Aydin, N., Portfolio value-at-risk with two-sided Weibull distribution: Evidence from cryptocurrency markets. Finance Res. Lett., 2021, 38, 101425.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, M., Ortiz, E. and Cabello, A., Bitcoin conditional volatility: GARCH extensions and Markov switching approach. Int. Finance Rev., 2019, 20, 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Stavroyiannis, S., Value-at-risk and related measures for the bitcoin. J. Risk Finance, 2018, 19(2), 127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, J.R. and Johannes, M.S., Bayesian modeling and forecasting of 24-hour high-frequency volatility. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 2014, 109(508), 1368–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, M., Watanabe, T. and Omori, Y., Volatility and quantile forecasts by realized stochastic volatility models with generalized hyperbolic distribution. Int. J. Forecast., 2016, 32(2), 437–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, M., Watanabe, T. and Omori, Y., Forecasting daily volatility of stock price index using daily returns and realized volatility. Econom. Statist., 2021. Article in Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306221000964
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiwari, A., Kumar, S. and Pathak, R., Modelling the dynamics of bitcoin and litecoin: GARCH versus stochastic volatility models. Appl. Econ., 2019, 51(37), 4073–4082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troster, V., Tiwari, A., Shahbaz, M. and Macedo, D., Bitcoin returns and risk: A general GARCH and GAS analysis. Finance Res. Lett., 2019, 30, 187–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucíos, C., Forecasting bitcoin risk measures: A robust approach. Int. J. Forecast., 2019, 35(3), 836–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucíos, C., Hotta, L.K. and Ruiz, E., Robust bootstrap forecast densities for GARCH returns and volatilities. J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 2017, 87(16), 3152–3174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucíos, C. and Taylor, J., A comparison of methods for forecasting value-at-risk and expected shortfall of cryptocurrencies. ResearchGate Working Paper, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, Y.K. and Tsui, A.K.C., A multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model with time-varying correlations. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 2002, 20(3), 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Tomás, D. and Ibañez, A., Semi-strong efficiency of bitcoin. Finance Res. Lett., 2018, 27, 259–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.-N., Liu, H.-C., Chiang, S.-M. and Hsu, Y.-T., On the predictive power of ARJI volatility forecasts for bitcoin. Appl. Econ., 2019, 51(44), 4849–4855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, G., The determinants of asymmetric volatility. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2001, 14(3), 837–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakoian, J.-M., Threshold heteroskedastic models. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 1994, 18(5), 931–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar