A theoretical generalization of the Markowitz model incorporating skewness and kurtosis

References

• Aksarayli, M. and Pala, O., A polynomial goal programming model for portfolio optimization based on entropy and higher moments. Expert Syst. Appl., 2018, 94, 185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, A., Chen, J. and Xing, Y., Downside risk. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2006, 19(4), 1191–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athayde, G.M. and Flôres Jr, R.G., Finding a maximum skewness portfolio—A general solution to three-moments portfolio choice. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 2004, 28, 1335–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, M.J. and Grauer, R.R., On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: Some analytical and computational results. Rev. Financ. Stud., 1991, 4(2), 315–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, B.M., The volatility of exchange rates and the non-normality of stock returns. J. Econ. Bus., 2017, 91, 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, G., A characterization of the distributions that imply mean-variance utility functions. J. Econ. Theory, 1983, 29, 185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. and Zhou, Y.S., Robust multiobjective portfolio with higher moments. Expert Syst. Appl., 2018, 100, 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chunhachinda, P., Dandapani, K., Hamid, S. and Prakash, A.J., Portfolio selection and skewness: Evidence from international stock markets. J. Bank. Finance, 1997, 21(2), 143–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, P.K., A subordinated stochastic process with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica, 1973, 41, 135–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, G.M. and Malliaris, A.G., Portfolio theory. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, edited by R. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic and W.T. Ziemba, pp. 1–30, 1995 (Elsevier: Amsterdam).
   Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L. and Uppal, R., Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy?. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2009, 22(5), 1915–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre, L. and Galeano, J.A., Mean-modified value-at-risk optimization with hedge funds. J. Altern. Investments, 2002, 5(2), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Finta, M.A. and Aboura, S., Risk premium spillovers among stock markets: Evidence from higher-order moments. J. Financ. Mark., 2020, 49, Article ID 100533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamba, A. and Rossi, F.A., A three-moment based portfolio selection model. Riv. Mat. Sci. Econ. Soc., 1998a, 21(1–2), 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gamba, A. and Rossi, F.A., Mean-variance-skewness analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. Ric. Oper., 1998b, 28(85–86), 5–46.
   Google Scholar
• Guidolin, M. and Timmermann, A., International asset allocation under regime switching, skew, and kurtosis preferences. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2008, 21(2), 889–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, C.R., Liechty, J.C., Liechty, M.W. and Muller, P., Portfolio selection with higher moments. Quant. Finance, 2010, 10(5), 469–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, C.R. and Siddique, A., Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. J. Finance, 2000, 55(3), 1263–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, P. and Scott, R., On the direction of preference for moments of higher moments than the variance. J. Finance, 1980, 35, 915–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, J.E., Theory of Financial Decision Making, 1987 (Rowman & Littlefield: Totowa, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Jarque, C.M. and Bera, A.K., A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int. Stat. Rev., 1987, 55(2), 163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean, W.H., The extension of portfolio analysis to three or more parameters. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 1971, 6(1), 505–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jondeau, E. and Rockinger, M., Optimal portfolio allocation under higher moments. Eur. Financ. Manag., 2006, 12(1), 29–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurczenko, E. and Maillet, B., Multi-Moment Asset Allocation and Pricing Models, 2006 (John Wiley & Sons: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Kan, R. and Smith, D.R., The distribution of the sample minimum-variance frontier. Manag. Sci., 2008, 54(7), 1364–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan, R. and Zhou, G., Optimal portfolio choice with parameter uncertainty. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 2007, 42(3), 621–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karoglou, M., Breaking down the non-normality of stock returns. Eur. J. Finance, 2010, 16(1), 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kon, S., Models of stock returns—A comparison. J. Finance, 2012, 39(1), 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, Y., Levy, H. and Markowitz, H.M., Mean-variance versus direct utility maximization. J. Finance, 1984, 39, 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassance, N. and Vrins, F., Portfolio selection with parsimonious higher comoments estimation. J. Bank. Finance, 2021, 126, 106–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon, A. and Moreno, M., One-sided performance measures under Gram–Charlier distributions. J. Bank. Finance, 2017, 74, 38–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, H. and Markowitz, H.M., Approximating expected utility by a function of mean and variance. Am. Econ. Rev., 1979, 69, 308–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liechty, M.W. and Sağlam, U., Revealed preferences for portfolio selection-does skewness matter?. Appl. Econ. Lett., 2017, 24(14), 968–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H., Portfolio selection. J. Finance, 1952, 7, 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martellini, L. and Ziemann, V., Improved estimates of higher-order comoments and implications for portfolio selection. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2010, 23(4), 1467–1502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegatti, M., New results on high-order risk changes. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2015, 243(2), 678–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, S.M. and Machina, M.J., Moment preferences and polynomial utility. Econ. Lett., 1987, 23(4), 349–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflug, G.C., Pichler, A. and Wozabal, D., The 1/N investment strategy is optimal under high model ambiguity. J. Bank. Finance, 2012, 36(2), 410–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulley, L.B., A general mean-variance approximation to expected utility for short holding period. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 1981, 16, 361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. and Smith, T., A test for multivariate normality in stock returns. J. Bus., 1993, 66, 295–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saranya, K. and Prasanna, P.K., Portfolio selection and optimization with higher moments: Evidence from the Indian stock market. Asia-Pac. Financ. Mark., 2014, 21(2), 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. and Horvath, P., On the direction of preference for moments of higher order than the variance. J. Finance, 1980, 35(4), 915–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöckl, S. and Kaiser, L., Higher moments matter! Cross-sectional (higher) moments and the predictability of stock returns. Rev. Financ. Econ., 2021, 39(4), 455–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrente, M.L. and Uberti, P., A rescaling technique to improve numerical stability of portfolio optimization problems. Soft Comput., 2021, to appear,
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, J., Better portfolios with higher moments. J. Asset Manag., 2020, 21(7), 569–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, J.X. and Idzorek, T.M., The impact of skewness and fat tails on the asset allocation decision. Financ. Anal. J., 2011, 67(2), 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Price convexity and skewness. J. Finance, 2007, 62, 2521–2552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakamouline, V. and Koekebakker, S., Portfolio performance evaluation with generalized Sharpe ratios: Beyond the mean and variance. J. Bank. Finance, 2009, 33(7), 1242–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoia, M., Biffi, P. and Nicolussi, F., Value at risk and expected shortfall based on Gram–Charlier-like expansions. J. Bank. Finance, 2018, 93, 92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar