Can volatility solve the naive portfolio puzzle?

References

• Andersen, T.G. and Teräsvirta, T., Realized volatility. In Handbook of Financial Time Series, pp. 555–575, 2009 (Springer: Berlin).
   Google Scholar
• Ao, M., Yingying, L. and Zheng, X., Approaching mean-variance efficiency for large portfolios. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2019, 32(7), 2890–2919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltussen, G. and Post, G.T., Irrational diversification: An examination of individual portfolio choice. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 2011, 46(5), 1463–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr, P., Guettler, A. and Miebs, F., On portfolio optimization: Imposing the right constraints. J. Bank. Financ., 2013, 37(4), 1232–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R.H., Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Am. Econ. Rev., 2001, 91(1), 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M.W., Santa-Clara, P. and Valkanov, R., Parametric portfolio policies: Exploiting characteristics in the cross-Section of equity returns. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2009, 22(9), 3411–3447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J.C. and Eisenstat, E., Bayesian model comparison for time-varying parameter VARs with stochastic volatility. J. Appl. Econ., 2018, 33(4), 509–532.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, V.K. and Ziemba, W.T., The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I, pp. 365–373, 2013 (World Scientific: Hackensack).
   Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, E.G. and Mahmoud, O., Naive diversification preferences and their representation. Working paper, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Nogales, F.J. and Uppal, R., A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Manage. Sci., 2009a, 55(5), 798–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L. and Uppal, R., Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Financ. Stud., 2009b, 22(5), 1915–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Plyakha, Y., Uppal, R. and Vilkov, G., Improving portfolio selection using option-implied volatility and skewness. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 2013, 48(6), 1813–1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Nogales, F.J. and Uppal, R., Stock return serial dependence and out-of-sample portfolio performance. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2014, 27(4), 1031–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R.S., Comparing predictive accuracy. J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 1995, 13(3), 253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchin, R. and Levy, H., Markowitz versus the talmudic portfolio diversification strategies. J. Portfolio Manage., 2009, 35, 71–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J., Do optimal diversification strategies outperform the 1/N strategy in UK stock returns? Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 2011, 20(5), 375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathergood, J., Hirshleifer, D., Leake, D., Sakaguchi, H. and Stewart, N., Naïve *Buying* diversification and narrow framing by individual investors. Working Paper 25567, NBER, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, C.M. and Reznikova, O., On the estimation of dynamic conditional correlation models. Comput. Stat. Data. Anal., 2012, 56(11), 3533–3545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, G. and Jiang, W., Offering versus choice in 401 (k) plans: Equity exposure and number of funds. J. Finance, 2006, 61(2), 763–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, R. and Ma, T., Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps. J. Finance, 2003, 58(4), 1651–1683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes, M., Korteweg, A. and Polson, N., Sequential learning, predictability, and optimal portfolio returns. J. Finance, 2014, 69(2), 611–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S., Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 1988, 12(2-3), 231–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S., Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 1991, 59, 1551–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner, G., factorstochvol: Bayesian estimation of (sparse) latent factor stochastic volatility models. R package version 0.9.2, 2019a.
   Google Scholar
• Kastner, G., Sparse Bayesian time-varying covariance estimation in many dimensions. J. Econom., 2019b, 210(1), 98–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, C. and Ostdiek, B., It's all in the timing: Simple active portfolio strategies that outperform naive diversification. J. Financ. Quant. Anal., 2012, 47(2), 437–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourtis, A., Dotsis, G. and Markellos, R.N., Parameter uncertainty in portfolio selection: Shrinking the inverse covariance matrix. J. Bank. Financ., 2012, 36(9), 2522–2531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M., Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. J. Empir. Finance, 2003, 10(5), 603–621.
   Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M., A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. J. Multivar. Anal., 2004, 88(2), 365–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M., Robust performance hypothesis testing with the sharpe ratio. J. Empir. Finance, 2008, 15(5), 850–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M., Robust performances hypothesis testing with the variance. Wilmott, 2011, 2011(55), 86–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M., Nonlinear shrinkage of the covariance matrix for portfolio selection: Markowitz meets goldilocks. Rev. Financ. Stud., 2017, 30(12), 4349–4388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H., Portfolio selection. J. Finance, 1952, 7(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. J. Financ. Econ., 1980, 8(4), 323–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, A. and Muir, T., Volatility-managed portfolios. J. Finance, 2017, 72(4), 1611–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, A. and Muir, T., Should long-term investors time volatility? J. Financ. Econ., 2019, 131(3), 507–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflug, G.C., Pichler, A. and Wozabal, D., The 1/N investment strategy is optimal under high model ambiguity. J. Bank. Financ., 2012, 36(2), 410–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W., Forecasting output and inflation: The role of asset prices. J. Econ. Lit., 2003, 41(3), 788–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W., Combination forecasts of output growth in a seven-country data set. J. Forecast., 2004, 23(6), 405–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucíos, C., Zevallos, M., Hotta, L.K. and Santos, A.A., Covariance prediction in large portfolio allocation. Econometrica, 2019, 7(2), 19.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, J. and Zhou, G., Markowitz meets talmud: A combination of sophisticated and naive diversification strategies. J. Financ. Econ., 2011, 99(1), 204–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogiatzoglou, M., Dynamic copula toolbox. Available at SSRN 2956888, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Wu, C. and Yang, L., Hedging with futures: Does anything beat the naïve hedging strategy? Manage. Sci., 2015, 61(12), 2870–2889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar