Neural network approach to portfolio optimization with leverage constraints: a case study on high inflation investment

References

• Al-Aradi, A., Correia, A., Jardim, G., de Freitas Naiff, D. and Saporito, Y., Extensions of the deep Galerkin method. Appl. Math. Comput., 2022, 430, 127287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Aradi, A. and Jaimungal, S., Outperformance and tracking: Dynamic asset allocation for active and passive portfolio management. Appl. Math. Finance, 2018, 25(3), 268–294.
   Google Scholar
• Alekseev, A.G. and Sokolov, M.V., Benchmark-based evaluation of portfolio performance: A characterization. Ann. Finance, 2016, 12, 409–440.
   Google Scholar
• Alizadeh, A.H. and Nomikos, N.K., Investment timing and trading strategies in the sale and purchase market for ships. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 2007, 41(1), 126–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anarkulova, A., Cederburg, S. and O'Doherty, M.S., Stocks for the long run? evidence from a broad sample of developed markets. J. Financ. Econ., 2022, 143(1), 409–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, A., Papanikolaou, D. and Westerfield, M.M., Portfolio choice with illiquid assets. Manage. Sci., 2014, 60(11), 2737–2761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, L.M., Leigh, D. and Mishra, P., Understanding US inflation during the COVID era. Technical report, 2022 (National Bureau of Economic Research).
   Google Scholar
• Basak, S., Shapiro, A. and Tepla, L., Risk management with benchmarking. Manage. Sci., 2006, 52(4), 542–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, F., Estimating expected return. Financ. Ana. J., 1993, 49(5), 36–38.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet-Scalliet, C., El Karoui, N., Jeanblanc, M. and Martellini, L., Optimal investment decisions when time-horizon is uncertain. J. Math. Econ., 2008, 44(11), 1100–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo, L., Liao, H. and Yu, X., Optimal tracking portfolio with a ratcheting capital benchmark. SIAM J. Control Optim., 2021, 59(3), 2346–2380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigo, D., Dalessandro, A., Neugebauer, M. and Triki, F., A stochastic processes toolkit for risk management, 2008. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.4210.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, S., Survival and growth with a liability: Optimal portfolio strategies in continuous time. Math. Oper. Res., 1997, 22(2), 468–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, S., Beating a moving target: Optimal portfolio strategies for outperforming a stochastic benchmark. Finance Stoch., 1999, 3, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, S., Risk-constrained dynamic active portfolio management. Manage. Sci., 2000, 46(9), 1188–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer price index summary, 2023. Available online at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_04122023.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaglia, S., Scott, L., Blay, K. and Hixon, S., Multi-asset class factor premia: A strategic asset allocation perspective. J. Portf. Manage., 2022, 48(4), 14–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Shirazi, M., Forsyth, P.A. and Li, Y., Machine learning and Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation for optimal decumulation: A comparison study, 2023. arXiv:2306.10582.
   Google Scholar
• Cogneau, P. and Zakamouline, V., Block bootstrap methods and the choice of stocks for the long run. Quant. Finance, 2013, 13(9), 1443–1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, F. and Oosterlee, C.W., Multi-period mean–variance portfolio optimization based on Monte-Carlo simulation. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 2016, 64, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cont, R. and Mancini, C., Nonparametric tests for pathwise properties of semimartingales. Bernoulli, 2011, 17(2), 781–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPP Investments, Annual Report 2021, 2021. Available online at: https://www.cppinvestments.com/the-fund/our-performance/financial-results/ (accessed 5 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• CPP Investments, Annual Report 2022, 2022. Available online at: https://www.cppinvestments.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CPP-Investments_F2022-Annual-Report-EN.pdf (accessed 5 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Cumbo, J., Yu, S. and Gara, A., US pension funds worth 1.5tn add risk through leverage, 2024. Available online at: https://www.ft.com/content/623b67f9-090c-457f-a327-dc9f767e327a (online, Financial Times).
   Google Scholar
• Dang, D.-M. and Forsyth, P.A., Continuous time mean-variance optimal portfolio allocation under jump diffusion: A numerical impulse control approach. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ., 2014, 30, 664–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, D.-M. and Forsyth, P.A., Better than pre-commitment mean-variance portfolio allocation strategies: A semi-self-financing Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2016, 250(3), 827–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. and Lleo, S., Risk-sensitive benchmarked asset management. Quant. Finance, 2008, 8(4), 415–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichtl, H., Drobetz, W. and Kryzanowski, L., Timing the stock market: Does it really make no sense? J. Behav. Exp. Finance, 2016, 10, 88–104.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M.F., Halperin, I. and Bilokon, P., Machine Learning in Finance, Volume 1406. 2020 (Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. In Breakthroughs in Statistics, edited by S. Kotz, and N. L. Johnson, pp. 569–593, 1992 (Springer: New York).
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, P.A., Optimal dynamic asset allocation for DC plan accumulation/decumulation: Ambition-CVAR. Insur. Math. Econ., 2020, 93, 230–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., Gao, Y., Hu, Y., Jiang, Z. and Su, J., Application of deep Q-network in portfolio management. In 2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Analytics (ICBDA), pp. 268–275, 2020 (IEEE).
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A., Deep Learning, 2016 (MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., Deep learning approximation for stochastic control problems, 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.07422.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, S. and Sylla, R.E., A History of Interest Rates, 1996 (Rutgers University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hornik, K., Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw., 1991, 4(2), 251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javorcik, B., Global supply chains will not be the same in the post-COVID-19 world. In COVID-19 and Trade Policy: Why Turning Inward Won't Work, edited by R. E. Baldwin and S. J. Everett, Volume 111, 2020 (CEPR Press: London).
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, D.P. and Ba, J., Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 2014. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
   Google Scholar
• Kou, S.G., A jump-diffusion model for option pricing. Manage. Sci., 2002, 48(8), 1086–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, S.G. and Wang, H., Option pricing under a double exponential jump diffusion model. Manage. Sci., 2004, 50(9), 1178–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratsios, A. and Bilokopytov, I., Non-Euclidean universal approximation. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2020, 33, 10635–10646.
   Google Scholar
• Lahaye, J., Laurent, S. and Neely, C.J., Jumps, cojumps and macro announcements. J. Appl. Econom., 2011, 26(6), 893–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W., Yu, H., Rival, X. and Yang, H., On correctness of automatic differentiation for non-differentiable functions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2020, 33, 6719–6730.
   Google Scholar
• L'Her, J.F., Stoyanova, R., Shaw, K., Scott, W. and Lai, C., A bottom-up approach to the risk-adjusted performance of the buyout fund market. Financ. Anal. J., 2016, 72(4), 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. and Ng, W.-L., Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: Multiperiod mean-variance formulation. Math. Finance, 2000, 10(3), 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. and Forsyth, P.A., A data-driven neural network approach to optimal asset allocation for target based defined contribution pension plans. Insur. Math. Econ., 2019, 86, 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Tsang, K.H. and Wong, H.Y., Lasso-based simulation for high-dimensional multi-period portfolio optimization. IMA J. Manage. Math., 2020, 31(3), 257–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, A. and Wong, B., A benchmark approach to optimal asset allocation for insurers and pension funds. Insur. Math. Econ., 2010a, 46(2), 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, A.E. and Wong, B., A benchmarking approach to optimal asset allocation for insurers and pension funds. Insur. Math. Econ., 2010b, 46(2), 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., MacMinn, R.D. and Tian, R., De-risking defined benefit plans. Insur. Math. Econ., 2015, 63, 52–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. and Lu, J., A universal approximation theorem of deep neural networks for expressing probability distributions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2020, 33, 3094–3105.
   Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, G. and Borrotti, M., A deep Q-learning portfolio management framework for the cryptocurrency market. Neural Comput. Appl., 2020, 32(23), 17229–17244.
   Google Scholar
• MacMinn, R., Brockett, P., Wang, J., Lin, Y. and Tian, R., The securitization of longevity risk and its implications for retirement security. In Recreating Sustainable Retirement, edited by O. Mitchell, R. Maurer, and P. Hammond, pp. 134–160, 2014 (Oxford University Press: Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, C., Non-parametric threshold estimation for models with stochastic diffusion coefficient and jumps. Scand. J. Stat., 2009, 36(2), 270–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1969, 51(3), 247–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J. Econ. Theory, 1971, 3(4), 373–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. J. Financ. Econ., 1976, 3(1–2), 125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASDAQ, NASDAQ Composite Index, 2023. Available online at: https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/index/comp/historical (accessed 15 February 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Ni, C., Li, Y., Forsyth, P. and Carroll, R., Optimal asset allocation for outperforming a stochastic benchmark target. Quant. Finance, 2022, 22(9), 1595–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, C., Li, Y. and Forsyth, P.A., Neural network approach to portfolio optimization with leverage constraints: A case study on high inflation investment, 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05297v2.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolosi, M., Angelini, F. and Herzel, S., Portfolio management with benchmark related incentives under mean reverting processes. Ann. Oper. Res., 2018, 266, 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norges Bank, Investment Strategy, 2022. https://www.nbim.no/en/the-fund/how-we-invest/investment-strategy/ (accessed 5 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Oderda, G., Stochastic portfolio theory optimization and the origin of rule based investing. Quant. Finance, 2015, 15(8), 1259–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øksendal, B.K. and Sulem, A., Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions, Volume 498. 2007 (Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Park, H., Sim, M.K. and Choi, D.G., An intelligent financial portfolio trading strategy using deep Q-learning. Expert Syst. Appl., 2020, 158, 113573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszke, A., Gross, S., Chintala, S., Chanan, G., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Lin, Z., Desmaison, A., Antiga, L. and Lerer, A., Automatic differentiation in Pytorch. In NIPS 2017 Workshop on Autodiff, Long Beach, CA, 2017. Available online at: https://openreview.net/forum?id=BJJsrmfCZ.
   Google Scholar
• Phalippou, L., Performance of buyout funds revisited? Rev. Finance, 2014, 18(1), 189–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politis, D.N. and Romano, J.P., The stationary bootstrap. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1994, 89(428), 1303–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin, C., Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat. Mach. Intell., 2019, 1(5), 206–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott, L. and Cavaglia, S., A wealth management perspective on factor premia and the value of downside protection. J. Portf. Manage., 2017, 43(3), 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad, S.J.H., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L. and Lucey, B., Is bitcoin a better safe-haven investment than gold and commodities? Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 2019, 63, 322–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonian, J. and Martirosyan, A., Sharpe parity redux. J. Portf. Manag., 2022, 48(4), 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirignano, J. and Spiliopoulos, K., DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys., 2018, 375, 1339–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepla, L., Optimal investment with minimum performance constraints. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 2001, 25, 1629–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Federal Reserve, What is an acceptable level of inflation? 2011. https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/5D58E72F066A4DBDA80BBA659C55F774.htm (accessed 5 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, K.H. and Wong, H.Y., Deep-learning solution to portfolio selection with serially dependent returns. SIAM J. Financ. Math., 2020, 11(2), 593–619.
   Google Scholar
• van Staden, P.M., Forsyth, P.A. and Li, Y., Beating a benchmark: Dynamic programming may not be the right numerical approach. SIAM J. Financ. Math., 2023, 14(2), 407–451.
   Google Scholar
• van Staden, P.M., Forsyth, P.A. and Li, Y., Across-time risk-aware strategies for outperforming a benchmark. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2024, 313(2), 776–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigna, E., On efficiency of mean–variance based portfolio selection in defined contribution pension schemes. Quant. Finance, 2014, 14(2), 237–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. and Forsyth, P.A., Numerical solution of the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman formulation for continuous time mean variance asset allocation. J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 2010, 34(2), 207–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. and Forsyth, P.A., Comparison of mean variance like strategies for optimal asset allocation problems. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 2012, 15(02), 1250014.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Foster, D.P. and Kakade, S.M., What are the statistical limits of offline RL with linear function approximation? 2020, 51(3).
   Google Scholar
• Yao, D.D., Zhang, S. and Zhou, X.Y., Tracking a financial benchmark using a few assets. Oper. Res., 2006, 54(2), 232–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. and Gao, Y., Portfolio selection based on a benchmark process with dynamic value-at-risk constraints. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2017, 313, 440–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., A dynamic model of active portfolio management with benchmark orientation. J. Bank. Finance, 2007, 31(11), 3336–3356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X.Y. and Li, D., Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection: A stochastic LQ framework. Appl. Math. Optim., 2000, 42, 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar