‘Disabling’ the museum: Curator as infrastructural activist

REFERENCES

• Allen, Graham (2003), ‘Textuality’, Roland Barthes, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Blind at the Museum (2005), Berkeley Art Museum, Berkeley, California, http://www.blindatthemuseum.com. Accessed 5 April, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cachia, Amanda (2013), ‘Cripping Cyberspace: A contemporary virtual art exhibition’, Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 2: 4, http://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/issue/view/2. Accessed 1 October, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cachia, Amanda (2013), ‘Talking blind: Museums, access and the discursive turn’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 33: 3, Double Issue: Museum experience and blindness & General Issue, http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3758/3281. Accessed 1 October, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cachia, Amanda (2012), ‘What Can a Body Do?’, http://exhibits.haverford.edu/whatcanabodydo/. Accessed 1 October, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• California College of the Arts (2012), ‘What can a body do? Investigating Disability in Contemporary Art roundtable discussion’, 17 February, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtSTRj2s9H8 (Part I) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKwkawC-Zxw (Part II).
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, Fiona (2010), ‘Curators, connoisseurs and object handling’, In Amelia Jones and Marsha Meskimmon (eds), Art, Museums and Touch, Re-Thinking Art's Histories, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, p. 114.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams (1991), ‘Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color’, Stanford Law Review, 43, 6 July, pp 1241–99. Rpt (2003), Identities: Race, Class, Gender, and Nationality (ed. Linda Martin Alcoff and Eduardo Mendieta), New York and Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DAADA Inc. (2012), ‘Here and Now 13’, Disability in the Arts, Disadvantage in the Arts (DADAA) and Lawrence Wilson Art Gallery, University of Western Australia, Perth, http://www.dadaa.org.au/project/4/here-and-now-13/. Accessed 23 September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson College (2009), ‘Re/Formations: Disability, women and sculpture’, 16 January—27 February, http://www2.davidson.edu/academics/acad_depts/galleries/reformations/index.html. Accessed 20 October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• English, Darby (2007), ‘Introduction: How to see a work of art in total darkness’, How to See a Work of Art in Total Darkness, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Ann (2009), ‘Leaving Venus behind: The new intersections of disability, women and sculpture’, ‘Re-Formations: Disability, Women, and Sculpture’. Van Every/Smith Galleries, 16 January—27 February, http://www2.davidson.edu/academics/acad_depts/galleries/reformations/essay/index.html. Accessed 20 October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie (2009), Staring: How We Look, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gevers, Ine (2009), Niet Normaal: Difference on Display, Beurs van Berlage, Amsterdam, www.nietnormaal.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, Jennifer (2008), ‘James Luna: Artifacts and Fictions’, Subject to Display: Reframing Race in Contemporary Installation Art, Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press, p. 38.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Beryl and Cook, Sara (2010), ‘Rethinking curating—contexts, practices, and processes’, Rethinking Curating: Art after New Media, Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press, p. 159.
   Google Scholar
• Grigely, Joseph (2011), ‘Beautiful progress to nowhere’, Parallel Lines Journal, http://www.parallellinesjournal.com/. Accessed 5 March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hillyer, Barbara (2011), ‘Ten years on: Re-presenting vital, problematising playing fields’ (Juliet Robson); ‘In the Ghetto’ (Aaron Williamson), Parallel Lines Journal, http://www.parallellinesjournal.com/. Accessed 5 March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hollins, Heather (2010), ‘Reciprocity, accountability, empowerment: Emancipatory principles and practices in the museum’, In Richard Sandell, Jocelyn Dodd and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson (eds.), Re-presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum, London: Routledge, pp. 228–243.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Amelia (1998), ‘Introduction’, Body Art: Performing the Subject, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Krysa, Joasia (2006), ‘Curating immateriality: The work of the curator in the age of network systems’, Curating Immateriality: The Work of the Curator in the Age of Network System, London: Autonomedia, The Data Browser, pp. 150–165.
   Google Scholar
• Kuppers, Petra (2012), ‘Nothing about us without us: Mounting a disability arts exhibit in Berkeley, California’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 32: 1, http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1733/3041. Accessed 12 June, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, Maria (2011), ‘Performing the curatorial: An introduction’, In Maria Lind (ed.), Performing the Curatorial: Within and Beyond Art, Berlin: Sternberg Press, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, Simi (1998), Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity, New York: New York University Press, p. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, Neil (2011), artist statement provided in email to author, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Marincola, Paula (2006), ‘Introduction: Practice Makes Perfect’, In Paula Marincola (ed.), What Makes a Great Exhibition? Questions of Practice, Philadelphia: Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative, The Pew Center for Arts & Heritage, pp. 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Miele, Josh (2012), Art Inclusion: Disability, Design, Curation, Irvine: University of California Humanities Research Institute (UCHRI) Residency hosted by the University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Montreal In/Accessible Collective (m.i.a.) (2013), Artist statement provided in email to author, 2013.1z
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, José Esteban (1999), Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics, London and Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Derek Conrad and Murray, Soraya (2006), ‘Uneasy bedfellows: Canonical art theory and the politics of identity’, Art Journal, 65: 1, Spring, pp. 22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Papalia, Carmen (2011), ‘Cutting the disability out of disability arts’, paper for M.A., Social Practice, Portland: Portland State University.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, Mike (2013), e-mail, author, 10 May and 13 May.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Colin (2000), ‘Introduction’, Outsider Art: Spontaneous Alternatives, London: Thames & Hudson, pp. 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sandahl, Carrie (2002), ‘Considering disability: Disability phenomenology's role in revolutionizing theatrical space’, Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, Spring, Vol. XVI, No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Sandell, Richard and Jocelyn Dodd (2010), ‘Activist Practice’, In Richard Sandell, Jocelyn Dodd and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson (eds.) Re-Presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schjeldahl, Peter (2008), ‘Inside outside: Martin Ramirez’, Let's See: Writings on Art from The New Yorker, New York: Thames and Hudson, pp. 105–137.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, Jackie Leach (2008), ‘Thinking through the variant body’, Disability Bioethics: Moral Bodies, Moral Difference, London: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Serendip Studio (2012), ‘Christine Sun Kim: Silence as discipline and mediated viewings of art’, http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/christine-sum-kim-silence-discipline-and-mediated-viewings-art. Accessed 13 December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shonibare, Yinka (2011), ‘Whilst it might be desirable to have a named category […]’; ‘In the Ghetto’ (ed. Aaron Williamson), Parallel Lines Journal, http://www.parallellinesjournal.com/. Accessed 5 March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, Tobin (2010), ‘Disability and the theory of complex embodiment—for identity politics in a new register’, In Lennard J. Davis (eds), The Disability Studies Reader Third 3rd Edition, London and New York: Routledge, p. 317.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, Tobin (2010), ‘Introducing disability aesthetics’, Disability Aesthetics, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, pp. 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Terry (2006), ‘Shifting the exhibitionary complex’, Thinking Contemporary Curating, New York: Independent Curators International., p. 57.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Terry (2012), ‘The infrastructural’, Thinking Contemporary Curating, New York: Independent Curators International, pp. 249–258.
   Google Scholar
• Storr, Robert (2006), ‘Show and tell’, In Paula Marincola (ed.), What Makes a Great Exhibition? Questions of Practice, Philadelphia: Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative, The Pew Center for Arts & Heritage, p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, Laura (2011), interview, telephone, 19 September.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, Laura (2013), e-mail, 14 October.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, Elizabeth (2012), ‘(Dis)played: American able and the display of contemporary disability art’, A Research Paper Submitted to the Graduate Programme in Critical Disability Studies, Toronto: York University.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, Elizabeth (2010), ‘Shifting definitions of access: Disability and emancipatory curatorship in Canada’, Muse Magazine: Canadian Museums Association, November/December, vol. XXVIII/6, pp. 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Nato (2011), ‘Creative time: “Living as Form”’, 24 September—16 October, http://www.creativetime.org/programs/archive/2011/livingas-form/. Accessed 10 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Corban (2011), interview, in-person, Venice, Italy, 2 June.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Aaron (2011), ‘In the Ghetto? A polemic in place of an editorial’, Parallel Lines Journal, http://www.parallellinesjournal.com/. Accessed 5 March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• YouTube (2012), ‘Artist Christine Sun Kim at Haverford College’, Shawn Kornhauser, 26 October, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ivcf2YCedtE. Accessed 27 January 2013.
   Google Scholar