Is this photograph taken? The active (act of) collaboration with photography

References

• Arbus, Diane. 1972. Diane Arbus. New York: Aperture.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, Rudolph. 1969. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University Of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, Rudolph. 1974. “On the Nature of Photography.” Critical Inquiry 1 (1): 149–161. doi: 10.1086/447782
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, Rudolph. 1993. “The Two Authenticities of the Photographic Media.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (4): 537–540. doi: 10.2307/431886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artner, Alan G. 2003. “ The War, in Color: Do the Bright Images Out of Iraq Obscure the True Nature of the Photos, or of the Conflict?” Chicago Tribune, April 10. Accessed April 18, 2016. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2003-04-10/features/0304100095_1_color-korean-war-berenice-abbott.
   Google Scholar
• Azoulay, Ariella. 2010. “What is a Photograph? What is Photography?” Philosophy of Photography 1 (1): 9–13. doi:10.1386/pop.1.1.9/7.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1984. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Batchen, Geoffrey. 1999. Burning with Desire: The Conception of Photography. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazin, André. 1960. “The Ontology of the Photographic Image.” Translated by Hugh Gray. Film Quarterly 13 (4): 4–9. doi: 10.1525/fq.1960.13.4.04a00030
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Walter. 2006. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Visual Culture: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies, edited by Joanne Morra and Marquard Smith, 114–137. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. Sociology in Question. Translated by Richard Nice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Mark, Michael E. Enzle, and Marian Morry. 2000. “The Social Psychological Power of Photography: Can the Image-Freezing Machine Make Something of Nothing?” European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (5): 613–630. doi: 10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<613::AID-EJSP11>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cat, Jordi. 2013. Maxwell, Sutton, and the Birth of Color Photography: A Binocular Study. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cobley, Paul, and Nick Haeffner. 2009. “Digital Cameras and Domestic Photography: Communication, Agency and Structure.” Visual Communication 8 (2): 123–146. doi: 10.1177/1470357209102110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crimp, Douglas. 1980. The Photographic Activity of Postmodernism, Vol. 15, 91–101: MIT Press. doi:10.2307/778455.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, Nicolas. 2006. “Art and Theoria.” In Thinking Through Art, edited by Kathy Macleod and Lin Holdrigde, 20–37. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Diamonstein, Barbara. 1981–1982. “ An Interview with Garry Winogrand.” In Visions and Images: American Photographers on Photography. New York: Rizoli. Accessed October 28, 2012. www.jnevins.com/garywinograndreading.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1995. “ The Epistemic Gap in Linguistic Stylistics.” In On Languages and Language. Presidential Addresses of the 1991 Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Trends in Linguistics, edited by Werner Winter, Studies and Monographs, Vol. 78. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Flusser, Vilém. 2000. Towards a Philosophy of Photography. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fosdick, Scott, and Shahira Fahmy. 2007. “Epistemic Honesty and the Default Assumption That Photos are True.” Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education 7 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.3138/sim.7.1.003
   Google Scholar
• Genoni, Paul. 2002. “The Photographic Eye: the Camera in Recent Australian Fiction.” Antipodes 16 (2): 137–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hayakawa, Samuel Ichiye. 1949. Language in Thought and Action. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, Keith J., and Paul Thagard. 1995. Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, Lea. 1994. “Assessment of Visually Impaired Infants.” Ophthalmology Clinics of North America 7 (2): 219–225.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, Terry S. 2015. “ The Enigma of Photography, Depiction, and Copyright Originality.” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 25(4). Accessed May 20, 2016. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2622148.
   Google Scholar
• Korzybski, Alfred. (1933) 1994. Science and Sanity – An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. 5th ed. Brooklyn: Institute of General Semantics.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2008. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McQuire, Scott. 1997. Visions of Modernity: Representation, Memory, Time and Space in the Age of the Camera. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Daniel. 2017. Photography and Collaboration: From Conceptual Art to Crowdsourcing. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Dawn M. 2009. “ Photography and Causation: Responding to Scruton’s Scepticism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (1): 327–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ramalingam, Chitra. 2010. “Fixing Transience: Photography and Other Images of Time in 1830s London.” In Time and Photography, edited by Jan Baetens, Alexander Streitberger, and Hilde Van Gelder, 3–26. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Bob. 1978. “Photography and the Photographic Image.” Art Journal 38 (1): 29–35. doi: 10.1080/00043249.1978.10793466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2012. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2017. “On the Relation Between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture.” The Sociological Review 62 (1): 24–46. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12109
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Stephanie. 1982. “What Photographs Can’t Do.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 41: 5–17. doi: 10.2307/430819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford. 2014. “Photography as an Act of Collaboration.” Journal of Media Practice 15 (3): 206–227. doi: 10.1080/14682753.2014.1000043
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, Roger. 1981. “Photography and Representation.” Critical Inquiry 7 (3): 577–603. doi: 10.1086/448116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekula, Allan. 1982. “On the Invention of Photographic Meaning.” In Thinking Photography, edited by Victor Burgin, 89–109. Basingstoke: Macmillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 1999. Fragmented Documents: Works by Lorna Simpson, Carrie Mae Weems, and Willie Robert Middlebrook at The Art Institute of Chicago, 245–272. Chicago: Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, Joel, and Neil Walsh Allen. 1975. “Photography, Vision, and Representation.” Critical Inquiry 2 (1): 143–169. doi: 10.1086/447832
   Google Scholar
• Solomon-Godeau, Abigail. 1981. “Photographing the Photographic.” Photo Communiqué, Summer, 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, Susan. 1973. On Photography. New York: Delta.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, Damian. 2009. Photography, Cinema, Memory: the Crystal Image of Time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, Theo, and Carey Jewitt, eds. 2001. Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• von Uexküll, Jakob. 1926. Theoretical Biology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, Thomas Carl. 2004. “The Time-Image: Deleuze, Cinema, and Perhaps Language.” Film-Philosophy, 8 (2). doi:10.3366/film.2004.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1952. “ Language, Mind and Reality.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 9 (Spring): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Joachim. 2003. Understanding the Grand Design: Spiritual Reality’s Inner Logic. Victoria, BC: Trafford Publishing.
   Google Scholar