Touch as an aesthetic experience

References

• About Art Education for the Blind. 2005. http://www.artbeyondsight.org/sidebar/aboutaeb.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, M., Z. Shengdong, and S. Sriram. 2016. “Investigating Expressive Tactile Interaction Design in Artistic Graphical Representations.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions (TOCHI) 23 (5): Article 32. doi:10.1145/2957756.
   Google Scholar
• Bacci, F., and D. Melcher. 2011. Art and the Senses. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacci, F., and F. Pavani. 2014. “‘First Hand’, not ‘First Eye’ Knowledge. Bodily Experience in Museums.” In The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space, edited by N. Levent and A. Pascual-Leone, 17–28. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgarten, A. G. 1750–58. Aesthetica. Ionnis Christiani Kleyb.
   Google Scholar
• Blindfolded Art. 2013. https://visi.co.za/blindfolded-art/.
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, F. 2004. “Don’t Touch! Hands Off! Art, Blindness and the Conservation of Expertise.” Body & Society 10 (1): 71–90. doi: 10.1177/1357034X04041761
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, F. 2008. “Touch and the Limits of the Rational Museum, or Can Matter Think.” The Senses and Society 3 (3): 277–292. doi:10.2752/174589308X331323.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Z. 2006. “Kinaesthesia.” In Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art, edited by C. Jones, 159–162. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 1998. The Color of Angels. Cosmology, Gender and the Aesthetic Imagination. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 2005a. “Fingerprints. Writing About Touch.” In The Book of Touch, edited by C. Classen, 1–9. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 2005b. “McLuhan in the Rainforest.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D. Howes, 147–163. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 2007. “Museum Manners: The Sensory Life of the Early Museum.” Journal of Social History 40 (4): 895–914. doi: 10.1353/jsh.2007.0089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. 2019. “Structures of Seeing: Blindness, Race, and Gender in Visual Culture.” The Senses and Society 14 (1): 63–80. doi: 10.1080/17458927.2019.1569331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degenaar, M., and G.-J. Lokhorst. 2017. Molyneux's Problem. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/molyneux-problem/.
   Google Scholar
• D’Evie, F., and G. Kleege. 2018. “The Gravity, The Levity: Let us Speak of Tactile Encounters.” Disability Studies Quarterly 38 (3), Published electronically. http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/6483/5090 doi: 10.18061/dsq.v38i3.6483
   Google Scholar
• Diaconu, M. 2006. “Reflections on an Aesthetics of Touch, Smell and Taste.” Contemporary Aesthetics 4 (1), Published electronically. https://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=385.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Merced, W. L. 2013. “Sound for the Exploration of Space Physics Data.” PhD thesis. University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Di Bello, P., and G. Koureas. 2010. “Other Than the Visual: Art, History and the Senses.” In Art, History and the Senses: 1830 to the Present, edited by P. Di Bello and G. Koureas, 1–18. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Diderot, D. 1999 [1749]. “Letter on the Blind for the Use of Those Who See.” In Thoughts on the Interpretation of Nature and Other Philosophical Works, edited by D. Adams, 149–200. Manchester: Clinaman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, R. 2011. “Aesthetic Touch.” In Art and the Senses, edited by F. Bacci and D. Melcher, 107–114. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallace, A., and C. Spence. 2011. “Tactile Aesthetics: Towards a Definition of its Characteristics and Neural Correlates.” Social Semiotics 21 (4): 569–589. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2011.591998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. 2016. “ Feel Me.” The New Yorker, May 9.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, C. 1961. Art and Culture: Critical Essays. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, N. 2002. Touch the Universe: A NASA Braille Book of Astronomy. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B. 1988. “Maps, Knowledge, and Power.” In The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, edited by D. Cosgrove and S. Daniels, 277–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, L., and J. Rajko. 2017. “Towards an Aesthetics of Touch.” Proceedings of MOCO’ 17, London, UK, June 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2005. “Introduction.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D. Howes, 1–17. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2011. “Hearing Scents, Tasting Sights.” In Art and the Senses, edited by B. Francesca and D. Melcher, 161–181. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1993. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. 1954. “The Nobility of Sight: A Study in the Phenomenology of the Senses.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (4): 507–519. doi: 10.2307/2103230
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. A. 2006. “The Mediated Sensorium.” In Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art, edited by C. Jones, 5–49. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. A. 2016. The Global Work of Art. World’s Fairs, Biennials, and the Aesthetics of Experience. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jütte, R. 2005. A History of the Senses. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kleege, G. 2005. “Blindness and Visual Culture: An Eyewitness Account.” Journal of Visual Culture 4 (2): 179–190. doi: 10.1177/1470412905054672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleege, G. 2018. More Than Meets the Eye. What Blindness Brings to Art. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kromm, J. 2010. “To Collect Is to Quantify and Describe: Visual Practices in the Development of Modern Science.” In A History of Visual Culture: Western Civilization from the 18th to the 21st Century, edited by J. Kromm and S. Benforado Bakewell, 74–88. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, S., and K. Sathian. 2014. “Please DO Touch the Exhibits! Interactions Between Visual Imagery and Haptic Perception.” In The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space, edited by N. Levent and A. Pascual-Leone, 3–16. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lauwrens, J. 2018. “More Than Meets the Eye: Embodied Engagement in After The Last Supper.” Art Journal 77 (2): 8–23. doi:10.1080/00043249.2018.1495519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levent, N., and A. Pascual-Leone. 2014. The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, D. M. M. 1997. “Art Media and the Sense Modalities: Tactile Pictures.” The Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189): 425–440. doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid, A., S. G. Roberts, L. Cilissen, K. Emmorey, B. Nicodemus, L. O’Grady, B. Woll, et al. 2018. “Differential Coding of Perception in the World’s Languages.” Proceedings of the National Academcy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (45): 11369–11376. doi:10.1073/pnas.1720419115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1993 [1961]. “Eye and Mind.” In The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, edited by G. Johnson, 121–149. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montero, B. 2006. “Proprioception as an Aesthetic Sense.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2): 231–242. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8529.2006.00244.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. 2007. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects, and Technologies. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Pye, E. 2008. The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museum and Heritage Context. New York: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, S. 2005. “Remembering the Senses.” In Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader, edited by D. Howes, 59–69. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Verrillo, R. T. 1992. “Vibration Sensation in Humans.” Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 9 (3): 281–302. doi: 10.2307/40285553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vi, C. T., D. Ablart, E. Gatti, C. Velasco, and M. Obrist. 2017. “Not Just Seeing, But Also Feeling Art: Mid-Air Haptic Experiences Integrated in a Multisensory art Exhibition.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 108: 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, N. J. 2011. “The Science and Art of the Sixth Sense.” In Art and the Senses, edited by F. Bacci and D. Melcher, 19–58. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsenach, B. 2009. Interview in Lynnwood, Pretoria, September 17.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsenach, B. 2013. Interview at MOAD, Johannesburg, March 16.
   Google Scholar