386
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Luciano Floridi and contemporary art practice

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Alley, Ronald. 1981. Catalogue of the Tate Gallery's Collection of Modern Art Other Than Works by British Artists. London: Tate Gallery and Sotheby Parke-Bernet.
  • Bagri Foundation. n.d. Anicka Yi at 58th International Art Exhibition – La Biennale di Venezia [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://bagrifoundation.org/anicka-yi-la-biennale-di-venezia/.
  • Berryman, Jim. 2018. “Art as Document: on Conceptual art and Documentation.” Journal of Documentation 74 (6): 1149–1161. doi:10.1108/JD-01-2018-0010.
  • Bianchini, Samuel, and Jean-Paul Fourmentraux. 2016. “Composing the Political Arts: On the Modes of Being of Artworks and Their Public.” In Practicable: From Participation to Interaction in Contemporary Art, edited by Samuel Bianchini, and Erik Verhagen, 771–780. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.
  • Bishop, J. Mark, and Mohammed Majid al-Rifaie. 2016. “Autopoiesis in Creativity and Art.” Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing, Article No.27. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. doi:10.1145/2948910.2948948.
  • de Blois, Jeffrey. 2018. “Artworks: Introduction.” In Art in the Age of the Internet: 1989 to Today, edited by Eva Respini, 108–109. Boston, MA: The Institute of Contemporary Art; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Boden, Margaret A. 2007. “Creativity and Conceptual Art.” In Philosophy and Conceptual Art, edited by Peter Goldie and Elizabeth Schellerkens, 216–237. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Boden, Margaret A. 2010. Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2009. “Deejaying and Contemporary Art.” In Appropriation, edited by David Evans, 12–23. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Buchloh, Benjamin H.D., ed. 1979. Dan Graham Video-Architecture-Television: Writings on Video and Video Works 1970–1978. Halifax, NS: Press of Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
  • Caruth, Nicole J. 2008. “Jenny Holzer at EVO Gallery.” ART21 Magazine [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://magazine.art21.org/2008/06/17/jenny-holzer-at-evo-gallery/#.XCt9WY7APIU.
  • Collins, Katie. 2014. “Artists Virtually Gatecrash Google’s DevArt Barbican Exhibit.” Wired [online], July 21. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/google-devart-exhibition-disrupted.
  • Cook, Sarah. 2016. Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Damjanski, David Lobser, and Monique Baltzer. n.d. MoMAR [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://momar.gallery/index.html.
  • Dayal, Geeta. 2012. “How the Artist who Built the ‘Chuck Close Filter’ Got Slammed by Chuck Close.” Wired [online], 07.10.12. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://www.wired.com/2012/07/artist-who-builds-chuck-close-filter-gets-slammed-by-chuck-close/.
  • Depoorter, Dries. 2020. Trojan Offices [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://driesdepoorter.be/trojan-offices/.
  • Droitcour, Brian. 2020. “Rafael Lozano-Hemmer on Seductive Participation and the Oppression of Metrics.” Art in America [online], June 5. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/interviews/rafael-lozano-hemmer-interview-interactive-art-surveillance-1202689903/.
  • Dryansky, Larisa. 2016. “Use Is Almost Meaning in Three Dimensions.” In Practicable: From Participation to Interaction in Contemporary Art, edited by Samuel Bianchini and Erik Verhagen, 781–794. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Dusek, Val. 2006. Philosophy of Technology: an Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Elgammal, Ahmed, Yan Kang, and Milko den Leeuw. 2017. “Picasso, Matisse, or a Fake? Automated Analysis of Drawings at the Stroke Level for Attribution an Authentication.” arXiv Preprint [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.03536/pdf.
  • Fallis, Don. 2016. “Mis- and dis-Information.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, edited by Luciano Floridi, 332–346. London: Routledge.
  • Feather, John. 2013. The Information Society: A Study of Continuity and Change. 6th edn. London: Facet.
  • Fend, Peter. 1997. “New Architecture From Matta-Clark.” In Reorganising Structure by Drawing Through it: Zeichnung bei Gordon Matta-Clark, edited by Sabine Breitwieser, 46–55. Vienna: Generali Foundation.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 1990. “The Search for Knowledge: From Desire to Defence: Hypothesis for the Introduction of a Peirceisch Interpretation of the Genetic Principle of the Process of Knowing as a Fundamental Orientation for a Future Gnoseology. [Online].” (Thesis (PhD)). University of Warwick. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/57160.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2005. “The Philosophy of Presence: From Epistemic Failure to Successful Observation.” Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 14 (6): 656–667. doi:10.1162/105474605775196553.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2008a. “Information Ethics: Its Nature and Scope.” In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Public Policy), edited by Jeroen van den Hoven and John Weckert, 40–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498725.004.
  • Floridi, Luciano, ed. 2008b. Philosophy of Computing and Information: 5 Questions. Copenhagen: Automatic Press.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2010a. Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2010b. “Ethics After the Information Revolution.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, edited by Luciano Floridi, 3–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2011a. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2011b. “A Defence of Constructionism: Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering.” Metaphilosophy 42 (3): 282–304. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01693.x.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2013. The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The 4th Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2015. “Commentary on the Onlife Manifesto.” In The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, edited by Luciano Floridi, 21–23. Cham: Springer Open. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_4.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2016a. “Semantic Information.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, edited by Luciano Floridi, 44–49. London: Routledge.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2016b. “Mature Information Societies: A Matter of Expectations.” Philosophy and Technology 29 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0214-6.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2018a. “Artificial Intelligence, Deepfakes and a Future of Ectypes.” Philosophy and Technology 31 (3): 317–321. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0325-3.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2018b. “Semantic Capital: Its Nature, Value, and Curation.” Philosophy and Technology 31 (4): 481–497. doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0335-1.
  • Floridi, Luciano. 2019. The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fritt Ord. 2016. A Discussion of Artificial Intelligence with John Searle and Luciano Floridi [video, online]. YouTube. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://youtu.be/b6o_7HeowY8?a.
  • Goldie, Peter, and Elizabeth Schellerkens, eds. 2007. Philosophy and Conceptual Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Graham, Mark, and William H. Dutton. 2019. Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing our Lives. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. Shanzhai: Deconstruction in Chinese. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Harr, Jonathan. 2006. The Lost Painting. New York: Random House.
  • Harrison, Rachel. 2003. “80s Again: Rachel Harrison.” Artforum 41 (8): 82. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://www.artforum.com/print/200304/rachel-harrison-4485.
  • Kastner, Jeffrey, ed. 2005. Odd Lots: Revisiting Gordon Matta-Clark's ‘Fake Estates’. New York: Cabinet Books.
  • Kosuth, Joseph, Mel Ramsden, and Kunstmuseum Luzern. 1973. Joseph Kosuth: Investigationen über Kunst und ‘Problemkreise’ seit 1965. Lucerne: Kunstmuseum Luzern.
  • Kuo, Michelle. 2018. ““To Avoid the Waste of a Cultural Revolution”: Experiments in Art and Technology. [Online].” (Thesis (PhD)). Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Science. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/41128206.
  • Lingner, Michael. 1993. Art as a System within Society [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://ask23.de/resource/ml_publikationen/kt93-1.
  • Lingner, Michael. 1994. The ‘Exhibition’ in Crisis within the System of Art [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://ask23.de/resource/ml_publikationen/kt94-1b_en_and-vers.
  • Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2010. A Philosophy of Computer Art. London: Routledge.
  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Art as a Social System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • McShine, Kynaston, ed. 1970. Information. New York: Museum of Modern Art. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://monoskop.org/File:McShine_Kynaston_L_ed_Information_1970.pdf.
  • Morrison, Elise. 2016. Discipline and Desire: Surveillance Technologies in Performance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.6944908.
  • Nake, Frieder. 2012. “Information Aesthetics: An Heroic Experiment.” Journal of Mathematics and the Arts 6 (2-3): 65–75. doi:10.1080/17513472.2012.679458.
  • Pangaro, Paul. n.d. a. Paskian Environments: Cybernetics and Pask. [video, online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://www.cyberneticians.com/index.html#movies.
  • Pangaro, Paul. n.d. b. Paskian Environments: Users to Designers. [video, online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://www.cyberneticians.com/index.html#movies.
  • Pask, Gordon, and Gerard de Zeeuw. 1992. Interactions of Actors, Theory and Some Applications [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://www.cybsoc.org/PasksIAT.pdf.
  • Perucci, Tony. 2017. “The Poetics of Ruptural Performance.” In Culture Jamming: Activism and the Art of Resistance, edited by Marilyn DeLaure and Moritz Fink, 280–299. New York: NYU Press.
  • Preston, Dominic. 2014. “Some Ontology of Interactive Art.” Philosophy and Technology 27 (2): 267–278. doi:10.1007/s13347-013-0134-7.
  • Respini, Eva. 2018. “No Ghost Just a Shell.” In Art in the Age of the Internet: 1989 to Today, edited by Eva Respini, 13–41. Boston, MA: The Institute of Contemporary Art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Rose, Bernice, ed. 2005. Logical Conclusions: 40 Years of Rule-Based Art. New York: Pace Wildenstein.
  • Rosen, Margit. 2016. “Gordon Pask’s Cybernetic Systems: Conversations After the End of the Mechanical Age.” In Practicable: From Participation to Interaction in Contemporary Art, edited by Samuel Bianchini and Erik Verhagen, 25–38. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Sandry, Eleanor. 2017. “Creative Collaborations with Machines.” Philosophy and Technology 30 (3): 305–319. doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0240-4.
  • Schneider, Arnd. 2016. “Art/Anthropology Interventions.” In Practicable: From Participation to Interaction in Contemporary Art, edited by Samuel Bianchini and Erik Verhagen, 195–213. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Shane, Janelle. 2019. You Look Like a Thing and I Love You. London: Wildfire.
  • Sierra, Santiago. 2012. Obstrucción de una vía con un contenedor de carga [video, online]. YouTube. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://youtu.be/MPAoz4VD_z0.
  • Spencer-Brown, George. 1969. Laws of Form. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Stemmrich, Gregor. 2002. “Dan Graham’s Time Delay Room 1.” In CTRL[SPACE]: Rhetorics of Surveillance From Bentham to Big Brother, edited by Ursula Frohne, Thomas Y. Levin, and Peter Weibel, 68–71. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Steyerl, Hito. 2012. The Wretched of the Screen. Berlin: Sternberg Press. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://www.e-flux.com/books/66675/the-wretched-of-the-screen/.
  • Thomson-Jones, Katherine. 2016. “Art and the Information Society.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, edited by Luciano Floridi, 375–385. London: Routledge.
  • Vanderstraeten, Raf. 2001. “Observing Systems: A Cybernetic Perspective on System/Environment Relations.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31 (3): 297–311. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00160.
  • Vasvani, Bansie. 2014. “The Yams Collective: Insurrection and Resistance.” Art21 magazine [online], December 2. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://magazine.art21.org/2014/12/02/the-yams-collective-insurrection-and-resistance/#.Xy76HChKjIV.
  • Vickers, Ben, and Victoria Ivanova. 2020. “How Will Advanced Technologies Impact the Art World? 3 Takeaways from the Serpentine’s Future Art Ecosystems Report.” Artnet news [online]. July 10. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://news.artnet.com/opinion/future-art-ecosystems-1893666.
  • Webster, Frank. 2014. Theories of the Information Society. 4th edn. London: Routledge.
  • Weckett, Simon. 2020. Google Maps Hacks [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. http://www.simonweckert.com/googlemapshacks.html.
  • Wilde, Carolyn. 2007. “Matter and Meaning in the Work of Art: Joseph Kosuth’s One and Three Chairs.” In Philosophy and Conceptual Art, edited by Peter Goldie and Elizabeth Schellerkens, 119–137. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Wilson, Mark. 2020. “Unleash Your Inner Damien Hirst with Snapchat’s New Filter.” Fast Company [online]. Accessed 12 August 2020. https://fastcompany.com/90499358/unleash-your-inner-damien-hirst-with-snapchats-new-filter.
  • Wilson, Stephen. 2002. Information Arts: Intersections of Art, Science, and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • de Zeeuw, Gerard. 2001. “Interaction of Actors Theory.” Kybernetes 30 (7/8): 971–983. doi:10.1108/03684920110396864.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.