Quantitative monitoring of military transformation in the period 1992–2010: Do the protagonists of transformation really change more than other countries?

References

• Bearne, S., et al., 2005. National security decision-making structures and security sector reform. Prepared for the United Kingdom’s Security Sector Development Advisory Team. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• von Bredow, W. and Germann, W.N., 2003. Assessing success and failure: practical needs and theoretical answers. In: W.N. Germann, ed. Towards security sector reform in post cold war Europe: a framework for assessment. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, A., 2004. Understanding security sector reform and reconstruction. In: H. Hänggi and A. Bryden, eds. Reform and reconstruction of the security sector. DCAF Yearly Books. Geneva: DCAF & LIT Verlag, 259–275.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, G., 2003. An introduction to the revolution in military affairs. Presented at the XV Amaldi Conference on Problems in Global Security, Helsinki, Finland [Online]. Available from: http://goo.gl/Vk6yLF [Accessed 21 March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.S., 1999. Annual report to the president and the congress: 1999. United States Government Printing [Online]. Available from: http://www.fas.org/man/docs/adr_00/chap10.htm [Accessed 18 August 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J.R., 1994. Another view of the revolution in military affairs. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College (SSI) [Online]. Available from: http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub240.pdf [Accessed 9 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Davis, N., 1996. An information-based revolution in military affairs. Strategic review, 24 (1), 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J.H., 1984. National security policy formulation: institutions, processes, and issues. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, C., 2002. Reform realities. In: I. Gyarmati and T. Winkler, eds. Post-cold war defense reform: lessons learned in Europe and the United States. Washington, DC: Brassey’s, 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, J. 2012. Transformation … was it worth it. Strategy Research Project. Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College, 5 [Online]. Available from: http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA561306 [Accessed 11 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, T., 2008. Convergence and divergence in post-cold war British, French, and German military reforms: between international structure and executive autonomy. Security studies, 17 (4), 725–774.10.1080/09636410802507990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds, T., 2003. Security sector reform: concepts and implementation. In: T. Edmunds and W.N. Germann, eds. Towards security sector reform in post cold war Europe: a framework for assessment. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, T., 2004. Security sector reform: concepts and implementation. In: P. Fluri and M. Hadžić, eds. Sourcebook on security sector reform. Collection of Papers. Geneva/Belgrade: DCAF/CCMR, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., 2008. The dynamics of British military transformation. International affairs, 84 (4), 777–807.10.1111/inta.2008.84.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. and Terriff, T., 2010. Military transformation in NATO: a framework for analysis. In: T. Farrell, Terriff Terry, and Osinga Frans, eds. A transformation gap?. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 1–13.10.11126/stanford/9780804763776.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fetterly, R.E., 2007. Problems inherent in the international comparison of defence expenditures. Canadian military journal, 1 (8), 89–92.
   Google Scholar
• Giegerich, B. and Nicoll, A., 2008. European military capabilities: building armed forces for modern operations. London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Golts, A.M. and Putnam, T.L., 2004. State militarism and its legacies: why military reform has failed in Russia. International security, 29 (2), 121–158.10.1162/0162288042879968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompert, D.C., Kugler, R.L., and Libicki, M.C., 1999. Mind the gap: promoting a transatlantic revolution in military affairs. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin S., 2006. Technology as a dynamic of defence transformation. Defence studies, 6 (1), 26–51.10.1080/14702430600838461
   Google Scholar
• Gyarmati, I. and Winkler, T., 2002. Post-cold war defense reform lessons learned in Europe and the United States. Washington, DC: Brassey’s.
   Google Scholar
• Hadžić, M., 2004. The concept of security sector reform. In: P. Fluri and M. Hadžić, eds. Sourcebook on security sector reform. Geneva/Belgrade: DCAF/CCMR, 11–44.
   Google Scholar
• Haltiner, K. and Klein, P., 2005. The European post-cold war military reforms and their impact on civil-military relations. In: F. Kernic, P. Klein, and K. Haltiner, eds. The European armed forces in transition: a comparative analysis. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hänggi, H., 2003. Making sense of security sector governance. In: H. Heiner and T.H. Winkler, eds. Challenges of security sector governance. DCAF Yearly Books. Geneva: DCAF & LIT Verlag, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsman, R., Gaughran, L., and Weitsman, P.A., 1993. The politics of policy making in defense and foreign affairs: conceptual models and bureaucratic politics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., 2005. Impact of information technology revolution on revolution in military affairs in the ROK armed forces. In: A.Y. Mansourov, ed. Bytes and bullets: information technology revolution and national security on the Korean Peninsula. Honolulu, HI: Asian-Pacific Center for Security Studies [Online]. Available from: http://www.apcss.org/Publications/Edited%20Volumes/BytesAndBullets/CH12.pdf [Accessed 22 June 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. and Rosen, S., 2005. Evolution or revolution? Journal of strategic studies, 28 (3), 437–448.10.1080/01402390500137317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosek, J.R., 2003. The soldier of the 21st century. In: S.E. Johnson, M.C. Libicki, and G.F. Treverton, eds. New challenges, new tools for defense decision-making. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 181–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hundley, R.O., 1999. Past revolutions, future transformations what can the history of revolutions in military affairs tell us about transforming the U.S. military? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Information Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2012. White papers of the Chinese government 2011. Bejing: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.E., et al., 2012. A review of the army’s modular force structure. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B.D., 2004. The Abrams Doctrine total force foundation or enduring fallacy? Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College [Online]. Available from: http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA423689 [Accessed 10 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Knox, M. and Murray, W., 2001. Thinking about revolutions. In: M. Knox and W. Murray, eds. The dynamics of military revolution 1300-2050. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1–12.10.1017/CBO9780511817335
   Google Scholar
• Korteweg, A.R., 2011. The superpower, the bridge-builder and the hesitant ally: how defense transformation divided NATO (1991–2008). Published thesis. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M.E., 1997. Night air combat: a United States military-technical revolution. A research paper. Presented to the research department Air Command and Staff College, in Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements of ACSC [Online]. Available from: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/docs/97-0604G.pdf [Accessed 20 June 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, A.F., 1992. The military-technical revolution a preliminary assessment. Prepared for the Office of Net Assessment. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, R.L., 2006. Policy analysis in national security affairs: new methods for a new era. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, D., 2004. Security sector reform in the Euro-Atlantic region: unfinished business. In: H. Hänggi and A. Bryden, eds. Reform and reconstruction of the security sector. DCAF Yearly Books. Geneva: DCAF & LIT Verlag, 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Libicki, M.C., 2003. Incorporating information technology in defense planning. In: S.E. Johnson, M.C. Libicki, and G.F. Treverton, eds. New challenges, new tools for defense decisionmaking. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 103–129.
   Google Scholar
• Linoff, G.S. and Berry, M.J.A., 2011. Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer relationship management. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Macgregor, D., 2004. Army transformation: implications for the future. Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee. Washington, DC: Rayburn House Office Building [Online]. Available from: http://goo.gl/ya07uL [Accessed 10 November 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, T.G. and FitzSimonds, J.R., 2003. Revolutionary ambivalence: understanding officer attitudes toward transformation. International security, 28 (2), 112–148.10.1162/016228803322761982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A.W., 2002. Foreword. In: A.F. Krepinevich Jr., ed. The military-technical revolution: a preliminary assessment. Center for strategic and budgetary assessments. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, i–ii.
   Google Scholar
• Martinusz, Z., 2003. Measuring success in SSR: a proposal to improve the toolbox and establish criteria. In: W.N. Germann and T. Edmunds, eds. Towards security sector reform in post cold war Europe: a framework for assessment. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R.N., 2014. The brain of the Russian Army: futuristic visions tethered by the past. The journal of slavic military studies, 27 (1), 4–35.10.1080/13518046.2014.874840
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, 2009. Development [Online]. Available from: http://www.mil.ru/eng/1864/12072/index.shtml [Accessed 6 October 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M., 2006. Modern military force structures. Council on Foreign Relations Council [Online]. Available from: http://www.cfr.org/world/modern-military-force-structures/p11819 [Accessed 22 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• NATO, 2005. Understanding NATO military transformation. Norfolk, VA: Allied Command Transformation.
   Google Scholar
• NATO, Allied Command Transformation, 2013. Strategic foresight analysis: draft future security implications.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Headquarters, 2010a. ACT management plan 2010.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Headquarters, 2010b. ACT strategic plan 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, D.J., 2006. Do we really understand what is meant by transformational change for defence? Defence studies, 6 (1), 73–96.10.1080/14702430600838537
   Google Scholar
• Newmyer, J., 2010. The revolution in military affairs with Chinese characteristics. Journal of strategic studies, 33 (4), 483–504.10.1080/01402390.2010.489706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, K., 2009. Transformation: military and science. An international journal, 23 (2), 245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Osinga, F., 2010. The rise of military transformation. In: T. Terriff, F. Osinga and T. Farrell, eds. A transformation gap? American innovations and European military change. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 14–34.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, M., 2002. The revolution in military affairs: implications for the Baltic states. Baltic defence review, 7 (1), 114–143.
   Google Scholar
• Prezelj, I., et al., 2015. Military transformation as perceived by experts. The journal of slavic military studies, 28 (1), 23–47.10.1080/13518046.2015.998120
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., 1989. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K.P., 2006. Building the future force: challenges to getting military transformation right. Contemporary security policy, 27 (3), 435–471.10.1080/13523260601060362
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, F.L., Hollerbach, L.M., and Hays, P.L., 1993. Planning, defense. In: T.N. Dupuy, ed. International military and defense encyclopedia. Washington, DC: Brassey’s, 2144–2149.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., 2009a. The capabilities-based approach. In: J. Scott, ed. Transforming defense capabilities new approaches for international security. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., 2009b. Measuring progress. In: J. Scott, ed. Transforming defense capabilities new approaches for international security. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 209–226.
   Google Scholar
• SIPRI Military Expenditure Database – www.sipri.org, 2011. [Online]. Available from: http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database [Accessed 15 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, E., 2007. Military transformation: key aspects and Canadian approaches. Calgary: Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute [Online]. Available from: http://goo.gl/1vWePL [Accessed 16 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Sterner, E.R., 1999. You say you want a revolution (in military affairs)? Comparative strategy, 18 (4), 297–308.10.1080/01495939908403187
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. and Corbin, J.M., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stulberg, A.N., 2005. Managing military transformations: agency, culture, and the U.S. carrier revolution. Security studies, 14 (3), 489–528.10.1080/09636410500323211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terriff, T. and Osinga, F., 2010. The difussion of military transformation to European militaries. In: T. Terriff, F. Osinga, and T. Farrell, eds. A transformation gap? American innovations and European military change. Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press, 187–209.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1993. The Military Balance, 1993–1994. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1994. The Military Balance, 1994–1995. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1995. The Military Balance, 1995–1996. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1996. The Military Balance, 1996. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1997. The Military Balance, 1997. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1998. The Military Balance, 1998. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1999. The Military Balance, 1999. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2000. The Military Balance, 2000. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2001. The Military Balance, 2001. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2002. The Military Balance, 2002. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2003. The Military Balance, 2003. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2004. The Military Balance, 2004. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2005. The Military Balance, 2005. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2006. The Military Balance, 2006. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2007. The Military Balance, 2007. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2008. The Military Balance, 2008. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2009. The Military Balance, 2009. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2010. The Military Balance, 2010. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2011. The Military Balance, 2011. London: IISS.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank Database, 2011. The World Bank data population totals [Online]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL [Accessed 26 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• US, Department of Defense, 2003a. Transformation planning guidance [Online]. Available from: http://www.defense.gov/brac/docs/transformation [Accessed 26 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• US, Department of Defense, 2003b. Military transformation: a strategic approach [Online]. Available from: http://www.iwar.org.uk/rma/resources/transformation/military-transformation-a-strategic-approach.pdf [Accessed 26 May 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Von Oer Freiherr, A., 1993. Policy, defense. In: T.N. Dupuy, ed. International military and defense encyclopedia. Washington, DC: Brassey’s, 2156–2161.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, R., 2007. The reserve policies of nations: a comparative analysis. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
   Google Scholar
• de Wijk, R., 2004. The implications for force transformation: the small country perspective. In: D.S. Hamilton, ed. Transatlantic transformations: equipping NATO for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University, 115–145.
   Google Scholar