Through military lenses. Perception of security threats and jointness in the Italian Air Force

References

• Asch, B. and Hosek, J.R., 2004. Looking to the future. What does transformation mean for military manpower and personnel policy?. Santa Monica: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D. and Lebovic, J., 2000. U.S. military attitudes toward post-cold war missions. Armed Forces & Society, 27 (1), 37–56.10.1177/0095327X0002700104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battistelli, F., Galantino, M.G., Fay Lucianetti, L. and Striuli, L., 2012. Opinioni sulla Guerra. L’Opinione Pubblica Italiana e Internazionale di Fronte all’Uso della Forza. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Battisti, G., 2012. Il Volo del Nibbio. Rivista Militare, 4, 74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. and Hansen, L., 2009. The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817762
   Google Scholar
• Caforio, G., 2000. Military sociological research in Italy. In: G. Kummel and A.D. Prufert, eds. Military sociology: the richness of a discipline. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 116–127.
   Google Scholar
• Caforio, G., ed., 2013. Soldiers without frontiers. The view from the ground. Experiences of asymmetric warfare. Acireale: Bonanno.
   Google Scholar
• Catignani, S., 2012. Getting COIN’ at the tactical level in afghanistan: reassessing counter-insurgency adaptation in the British army. The journal of strategic studies, 35 (4), 513–539.10.1080/01402390.2012.660625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coticchia, F. and Moro, F.N., 2015. Adapt, improvise, overcome? The transformation of Italian armed forces in comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coticchia, F. and Moro, F.N., 2016. Learning from Others? Emulation and transformation in the Italian armed forces since 2001. Armed Forces&Society, 42 (4), 696–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, P.J., et al., 2002. Military transformation and the defense industry after next: the defense industrial implications of network-centric warfare. US Naval War College.10.21236/ADA421889
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, T., 2011. Managing convergence: German military doctrine and capabilities in the 21st century. Defense Studies, 11 (2), 244–270.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J.E., et al., 1997. How to conduct organizational surveys: a step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, M., 1988. Innovation and the arms race: how the United States and the soviet union develop new military technologies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., 2008. The dynamics of British military transformation. International affairs, 84 (4), 777–807.10.1111/inta.2008.84.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., Rynning, S. and Terriff, T., 2013. Transforming military power since the end of the cold war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107360143
   Google Scholar
• Feaver, P.D., 2003. Armed servants: agency, oversight and civil-military relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674036772
   Google Scholar
• Foley, R.T., Griffin, S. and Mccartney, H., 2011. ‘Transformation in contact’: learning the lessons of modern war. International affairs, 87 (2), 253–270.10.1111/inta.2011.87.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P., 2002. European military education today. In: G.C. Kennedy and K. Nielson, eds. Military education: past, present, and future. Westport, CT: Praeger, 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Gholz, E. and Sapolsky, H.M., 2000. Restructuring the US defense industry. International security, 24 (3), 5–51.10.1162/016228899560220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomello, G. and Verbeek, B., eds., 2011. Italy’s foreign policy in the 21st century. The new assertiveness of an aspiring Middle Power?. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, C., 2013. Un nuovo anno per un nuovo esercito. Rivista Militare, 1, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, S., 2016. Military innovation studies: multidisciplinary or lacking discipline? Journal of strategic studies, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, A., 2006. The future of military innovation studies. The journal of strategic studies, 29 (5), 905–934.10.1080/01402390600901067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, H., 2017. Who matters for memory: Sources of institutional memory in international organization crisis management. The review of international organizations, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hura, M., et al., 2000. Interoperability: a continuing challenge in coalition air operations. Santa Monica, CL: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Ignazi, P., Giacomello, G. and Coticchia, F., 2012. Just don’t call it war, Italian military missions abroad. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G.C. and Nielson, K., eds., 2002. Military education: past, present, and future. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kraut, A.I., 1996. An overview of organizational surveys. In: A. Kraut, ed. Organizational surveys: tools for assessment and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Haaland, T.L., 2016. The limits to learning in military operations: bottom-up adaptation in the Norwegian army in Northern Afghanistan, 2007–2012. The journal of strategic studies, 39 (7), 999–1022.10.1080/01402390.2016.1202823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, A., 2015. Tecnologia e Rivoluzione negli Affari Militari. In: Foradori, P. and Giacomello, G., eds., Sicurezza globale. Le nuove minacce. Bologna: Il Mulino, 221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Locatelli, A., Moro, F.N., and Coticchia, F. 2016. Renew or reload? Continuity and change in Italian defence policy. EUI working papers series, EUI RSCAS 1/2016, ISSN 1028-3625.
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, E.N., 1996. A post-heroic military policy. Foreign Affairs, 75 (4), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken, T. and FitzSimonds, J., 2003. The limits of transformation, officer attitudes toward the revolution in military affairs. Newport: Naval War College Newport Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnken, T. and FitzSimonds, J., 2004. Tread-heads or technophiles? Army officer attitudes toward transformation Parameters, 34 (2), 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, H. and Weiss, M., forthcoming. Introduction. In: H. Meijer and Weiss, eds., The handbook of European armed forces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millet, A.R., Williamson, M. and Watman, K.H., 1988. The effectiveness of military organizations. In: A.R. Millet and M. Williamson, eds. Military effectiveness volume I: the first world war, Mershon Center Series on Defense and Foreign Policy. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., 2016. Fighting separately: jointness and civil-military relations in India. Journal of strategic studies, 40 (1–2), 6–34. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1196357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nones, M. and Marrone, A., 2011. La Trasformazione delle Forze Armate: il programma Forza NEC. Roma: Quaderni IAI.
   Google Scholar
• Norheim-Martinsen, P.M., 2016. New sources of military change – armed forces as normal organizations. Defense studies, 16 (3), 312–326.10.1080/14702436.2016.1195234
   Google Scholar
• Owens, M., 1997. The use and abuse of jointness. Marine corps gazette, 81, 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Paget, S., 2016. Interoperability of the mind. The RUSI journal, 161 (4), 42–50.10.1080/03071847.2016.1224496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannier, A., 2013. Understanding the workings of interstate cooperation in defence: an exploration into Franco-British cooperation after the signing of the Lancaster House Treaty. European security, 22 (4), 540–558.10.1080/09662839.2013.833908
   Google Scholar
• Pannier, A. and Schmitt, O., 2014. Institutionalised cooperation and policy convergence in European defense: lessons from the relations between France, Germany and the UK. European security, 23 (3), 270–289.10.1080/09662839.2014.884073
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S.P., 1988. New ways of war: understanding military innovation. International security, 13 (1), 134–168.10.2307/2538898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffa, C., 2014. What peacekeepers think and do. An explanatory study of French, Ghanaian, Italian and South Korean Armies in the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, Armed Forces & Society, 40 (2), 199–225.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J.A., 2010. Innovation in war: counterinsurgency operations in Anbar and Ninewa Provinces, Iraq, 2005–2007. The journal of strategic studies, 33 (4), 595–624.10.1080/01402390.2010.489715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., 2005. The utility of force: The art of war in the modern world. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Soeters, J., Schields, P.M. and Rietjens, S., eds., 2014. Handbook of research methods in military studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stouffer, S.A., et al., 1949. The American soldier: adjustment during army life, vol. 1 in studies in social psychology in world war II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terriff, T., 2010. NATO military transformation: challenges and opportunities for France. European Security, 19 (1), 61–78.10.1080/09662839.2009.501079
   Google Scholar
• Terriff, T., Osing, F. and Farrell, T., 2010. A transformation gap? American innovations and European military change. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ucko, D., 2008. Innovation or Inertia: the U.S. military and the learning of counterinsurgency. Orbis, 52 (2), 290–310.10.1016/j.orbis.2008.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Vennesson, P., Breuer, F., de Franco, C. and Schroeder, U.C., 2009. Is there a European way of WAR? Role conceptions, organizational frames, and the utility of force, armed forces & society, 35 (4), 628–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner, I., 2013. Importing the American way of war? Network-centric warfare in the UK and Germany. Baden Baden: Nomos Verlag.10.5771/9783845247908
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, S.R., 2000. Self-jamming behavior: Joint interoperability, root causes, and thoughts on solutions. Comparative strategy, 19 (4), 309–317.10.1080/01495930008403218
   Google Scholar
• Zapfe, M., 2016. Strategic culture shaping allied transformation: the bundeswehr and joint operational doctrine. The journal of strategic studies, 39 (2), 246–260.10.1080/01402390.2015.1115044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar