Advanced search
Publication Cover
Defence Studies Volume 18, 2018 - Issue 3: Defence Planning as Strategic Fact
Submit an article Journal homepage
9,806
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Defence planning as strategic fact: introduction

Henrik BreitenbauchCentre for Military Studies, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
André Ken JakobssonCentre for Military Studies, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkView further author information
Pages 253-261 | Received 07 Mar 2018, Accepted 03 Jul 2018, Published online: 07 Aug 2018

References

  • Angstrom, J., 2018. The US perspective on future war: why the US relies upon Ares rather than Athena. Defence studies, 18 (3), 318–338.
  • Christiansson, M., 2018. Defense planning beyond rationalism: the third offset strategy as a case of metagovernance. Defence studies, 18 (3), 262–278.
  • Collins, J.M., 1982. U. S. defense planning: a critique. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Davis, P.K., 2018. Defense planning when major changes are needed. Defence studies, 18 (3), 374–390.
  • Durkheim, É., 1982. The rules of sociological method. New York: The Free Press.
  • Frühling, S., 2014. Defence planning and uncertainty: preparing for the next Asia-Pacific war. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Gray, C., 2014. Strategy and defence planning: meeting the challenge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Håkenstad, M. and Larsen, K.K., 2012. Long-term defence planning. A comparative study of seven countries, Oslo Files on Defence and Security, 5/2012.
  • Hintze, O., 1975. Military organization and the organization of the state. In: F. Gilbert, ed. The historical essays of Otto Hintze. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jensen, B., 2018. The role of ideas in defense planning: revisiting the revolution in military affairs. Defence studies, 18 (3), 302–317.
  • Mattelaer, A., 2018. Rediscovering geography in NATO defence planning. Defence studies, 18 (3), 339–356.
  • Norheim-Martinsen, P., 2016. New sources of military change – armed forces as normal organizations. Defence studies, 16 (3), 312–326. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1195234.
  • Spiegeleire, S., 2012. Taking the battle upstream: towards a benchmarking role for NATO, Report, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Washington, DC, September, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a582370.pdf
  • Tama, J., 2018. Tradeoffs in defense strategic planning: lessons from the U.S. quadrennial defense review. Defence studies, 18 (3), 279–301.
  • Tilly, C., 1975. Reflections on the history of European State-making. In: C. Tilly, ed. The formation of national states in western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3–83.
  • Young, T.-D., 2018. Questioning the “sanctity” of long-term defense planning as practiced in Central and Eastern Europe. Defence studies, 18 (3), 357–373.
Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.