A consideration of how emerging military leaders perceive themes in the autonomous weapon system discourse

References

• Acheson, Ray. 2019. “A WILPF Guide to Killer Robots,” Reaching Critical Will.
   Google Scholar
• Amoroso, D., and G. Tamburrini. 2020. “Autonomous Weapons Systems and Meaningful Human Control: Ethical and Legal Issues.” Current Robotics Reports 1 (4):187–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00024-3.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., D. Reisner, and M. C. Waxman. 2014. “Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapon Systems.” International Law Studies 90:386–411.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. 2016. “Why the Hurry to Regulate Autonomous Weapon Systems-but Not Cyber-weapons.” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 30:17.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, R. 2013. “Lethal Autonomous Systems and the Plight of the Non-combatant.” AISB Quarterly 137:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, Ronald. Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Arkin, Ronald. ”The case for banning killer robots: Counterpoint.” Communications of the ACM 58, no. 12 (2015): 46–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center, A. C. I. 2017. Robotic and Unmanned Systems Strategy, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command.
   Google Scholar
• Chamayou, G. 2011. “The Manhunt Doctrine.” Radical Philosophy 169 (3):15.
   Google Scholar
• Cheater, Julian C. 2000. Accelerating the Kill Chain Via Future Unmanned Aircraft, ed. Centre for Strategy and Technology, Air War College, Blue Horizons Paper, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Crootof, R. 2015. War Torts: Accountability for Autonomous Weapons. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Crootof, R. 2016. “A Meaningful Floor for ‘Meaningful Human Control.’” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 30 (1), pp. 53-62.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence. 2019. Defence Census 2019: Public Report. Canberra: Australian Department of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense (DOD). 2012. Directive 3000.09, Accessed 21 November 2012 https://www.esd.whs.mil
   Google Scholar
• Development, C. a. D. C. 2018. Joint Concept Note 1/18 Human Machine Teaming. Joint Concept Note, U.K. Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Dinstein, Y. 2016. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelhof, M. 2019. “Moving beyond Semantics on Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control in Operation.” Global Policy 10 (3):343–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, A. M. 2020. “ Swedish Defence Research Agency, http://www.fcas-forum.eu/publications/Meaningful-Human-Control-of-Autonomous-Weapon-Systems-Eklund.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, H., and M. S. Schmidt 2016. “‘Bomb Robot’ Takes down Dallas Gunman, but Raises Enforcement Questions.” New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, T.M. 2006. “The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Power Disequilibrium.” American Journal of International Law 100 (1):88–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3518832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliott, J. C. 2012. “Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles and the Asymmetry Objection: A Response to Strawser.” Journal of Military Ethics 11 (1):58–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2012.683703.
   Google Scholar
• Galliott, J, B Baggiarini, and S Rupka. 2021. “Empirical Data on Attitudes Towards Autonomous Systems.” In Lethal Autonomous Weapons: Re-Examining the Law and Ethics of Robotic Warfare, edited by Galliott, J, JD Ohlin, and D MacIntosh, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 137-158. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/lethal-autonomous-weapons-9780197546048?cc=us&lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, D. N. 2014. “Autonomous Weapons and the Problem of State Accountability.” Chicago Journal of International Law 15:652.
   Google Scholar
• Heyns, C. 2013. Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/23/47. 9 April
   Google Scholar
• Heyns, C. 2017. “Autonomous Weapons in Armed Conflict and the Right to a Dignified Life: An African Perspective.” South African Journal on Human Rights 33 (1):46–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2017.1303903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C. 2016a. “Public Opinion and the Politics of the Killer Robots Debate.” Research and Politics 3 (1):1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015627183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. C. 2016b. “Why Why Words Matter: The Real World Consequences of Defining Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 30:85.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2014. “Autonomous Weapon Systems: Technical, Military, Legal and Humanitarian Aspects.” Paper presented to the Expert Meeting, Switzerland, 26-28/03/2014.
   Google Scholar
• Initiative, O. R. 2015. Summary Report - The Ethics and Governance of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: An International Public Opinion Poll, Open Roboethics Initiative
   Google Scholar
• IPSOS. 2017. “Data for 2017 Campaign to Stop Killer Robots Survey.” In.
   Google Scholar
• IPSOS. 2019. “Six in Ten (61%) Respondents across 26 Countries Oppose the Use of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems Accessed 15 August 2021.” https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/human-rights-watch-six-in-ten-oppose-autonomous-weapons
   Google Scholar
• IPSOS. 2021. “Global Survey Highlights Continued Opposition to Fully Autonomous Weapons”. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/global-survey-highlights-continued-opposition-fully-autonomous-weapons
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. W. 2002. “The Paradox of Riskless Warfare.” Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 22 (3):2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kania, E. 2018. “China’s Strategic Ambiguity and Shifting Approach to Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Lawfare, Accessed 17 April 2018, https://www.lawfareblog.com/chinas-strategicambiguity-and-shifting-approach-lethal-autonomous-weapons-systems
   Google Scholar
• Kania, E. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence in China’s Revolution in Military Affairs.” Journal of Strategic Studies 44 (4):1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1894136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastan, B. 2013. “Autonomous Weapons Systems: A Coming Legal “Singularity”?” Journal of Law, Technology & Policy 45 (1):45–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J. 2015. “Reply to Sparrow: Martial Courage – Or Merely Courage?” Journal of Military Ethics 14 (3–4):228–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2015.1109942.
   Google Scholar
• Konaev, Margarita, Tina Huang, and Husanjot Chahal. ”Trusted Partners: Human-Machine Teaming and the Future of Military AI.” Center for Security and Emerging Technology (2021): 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kralingen, M.V. 2016. “Use of Weapons: Should We Ban the Development of Autonomous Weapons Systems?” The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs 18 (2):132–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23800992.2016.1196947.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A. 2009. “Automating War: The Need for Regulation.” Contemporary Security Policy 30 (1):172–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260902760397.
   Google Scholar
• Kua, C. 2016. “Autonomous Weapon Systems, International Law and Meaningful Human Control.” Australian Army Journal 13 (1):21.
   Google Scholar
• Kumm, M. 2004. “The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis.” European Journal of International Law 15 (5):907–931. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.5.907.
   Google Scholar
• LeMay, Curtis E. 2017. “Center for Doctrine Development and Education, ‘Annex 3-60 Targeting.’” Air Education and Training Command (AETC). Alabama: Maxwell Air Force Base. AETC.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntosh, D. 2020. “Fire and Forget: A Moral Defense of the Use of Autonomous Weapons Systems in War and Peace.” In Lethal Autonomous Weapons: Re-Examining the Law and Ethics of Robotic Warfare, edited by Galliott, J., D. MacIntosh, and Jens David Ohlin. pp. 9-24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maneuver, Aviation, and Soldier Division Army Capabilities Integration. 2017. “The U.S. Army Robotic and Autonomous Systems Strategy.” U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Fort Eustis, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Margulies, P. 2016. “Making Autonomous Weapons Accountable: Command Responsibility for Computer-Guided Lethal Force in Armed Conflicts.” In Research Handbook on Remote Warfare. edited by Jens David Ohlin. pp. 405-442. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margulies, P. 2019. “The Other Side of Autonomous Weapons: Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance IHL Compliance.” In The Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Law of Armed Conflict, edited by Jensen, E.T. and R.T Alcala. Vol. 2. pp. 147-174. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. 2015. “A Means-methods Paradox and the Legality of Drone Strikes in Armed Conflict.” The International Journal of Human Rights 19 (2):142–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2014.998864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raska, M. 2021. “The Sixth RMA Wave: Disruption in Military Affairs?” Journal of Strategic Studies 44 (4):456–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1848818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roff, H.M., and D. Danks. 2018. “’Trust but Verify’: The Difficulty of Trusting Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Journal of Military Ethics 17 (1):2–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2018.1481907.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, A. 2020. “Bots on the Ground: An Impending UGV Revolution in Military Affairs?” Small Wars & Insurgencies 31 (4):851–873. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2020.1743484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. 2018. “Russia’s Approaches to the Elaboration of a Working Definition and Basic Functions of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems in the Context of the Purposes and Objectives of the Convention.” Group of Governmental Experts of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects.
   Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. 2019. “Potential Opportunities and Limitations of Military Uses of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Mick. Man-machine Teaming for Future Ground Forces. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, F. 2021. “Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” In The Routledge Social Science Handbook of A.I, edited by Anthony Elliott. pp. 237–250. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M., and J. Thurnher. 2012. “Out of the Loop: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Law of Armed Conflict.” Harvard National Security Journal 4: 231–281.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. 2013. “Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: A Reply to the Critics.” Harvard National Security Journal Features. pp. 1-37.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, Jason, and Jai Galliott. 2018. “A.I. In Weapons: The Moral Imperative for Minimally-Just Autonomy.” International Conference on Science and Innovation for Land Power. Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, N. 2010. “Saying ‘No!’to Lethal Autonomous Targeting.” Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4):369–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2010.537903.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. W. 2009. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Robin. 2018. “Robotic & Autonomous Systems Strategy.” Future Land Warfare Branch, Canberra: Australian Army.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R. 2015a. “Martial and Moral Courage in Teleoperated Warfare: A Commentary on Kirkpatrick.” Journal of Military Ethics 14 (3–4):220–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2015.1109946.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R. 2015b. “Drones, Courage, and Military Culture.” In Routledge Handbook of Military Ethics, edited by G. Lucas. pp. 380–395. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R. 2015c. “Twenty Seconds to Comply: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Recognition of Surrender.” International Law Studies 91 (1):20.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, B., N. Sharkey, N. Marsh, and R. Crootof 2015. “Special Session 10: How to Regulate Autonomous Weapon Systems.” Paper presented at the 2015 E.U. Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Conference, International Institute for Strategic Studies, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C.A. 2014. “The Uses and Abuses of Legitimacy in International Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34 (4):729–758. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscano, C. P. 2015. “Friend of Humans: An Argument for Developing Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Journal of National Security Law and Policy 8 (1):189–246.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. G. A. Office. 2014. Actions Needed to Strengthen Management of Unmanned Aerial System Pilots. GAO Report to Congressional Requesters, Government Accountability Office: 18.
   Google Scholar
• U.K. Ministry of Defence. 2011. “Joint Doctrine Note 2/11: The U.K. Approach to Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” ed. U.K. Ministry of Defence
   Google Scholar
• Umbrello, S., P. Torres, and A. F. De Bellis. 2020. “The Future of War: Could Lethal Autonomous Weapons Make Conflict More Ethical?” AI & Society 35(1):273–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00879-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdiesen, I., F. S. de Sio, and V. Dignum. 2021. “Accountability and Control over Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Framework for Comprehensive Human Oversight.” Minds and Machines 31 (1):137–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09532-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. 2010. “Drone Warfare and the Laws of Armed Conflict.” Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 45 (1):45–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. 2014. “Dehumanisation of International Humanitarian Law: Legal, Ethical, and Political Implications of Autonomous Weapon Systems, The.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 47:1371.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. I. 2015. “Political Accountability and Autonomous Weapons.” Research & Politics 2 (4):4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015606749.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Toby. 2018. 2062: The world that A.I. made. Black Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., and P. C. Bolger. 2019. “Procedural Justice Perceptions, Legitimacy Beliefs, and Compliance with the Law: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 15 (3):341–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9338-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A., and A. Hillas. 2020. “Friend or Frenemy? The Role of Trust in Human-machine Teaming and Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 31 (4):822–850. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2020.1743485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, A. 2020. “So Just What Is a Killer Robot?: Detailing the Ongoing Debate around Defining Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems.” Wild Blue Yonder Accessed 10 August 2021, https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Wild-Blue-Yonder/Article-Display/Article/2208774/so-just-what-is-a-killer-robot-detailing-the-ongoing-debate-around-defining-let
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., M. Anderljung, L. Kahn, N. Dreksler, M. C. Horowitz, and A. Dafoe. 2021. “Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Survey of Machine Learning Researchers.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 71 arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.02117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12895.
   Google Scholar