Interpolarity. Re-visiting security and the global order

References

• Acharya, Amitav. 2017. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics & International Affairs 31 (3): 271–285. doi:10.1017/S089267941700020X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert M. 2006. The Evolution of Cooperation. Revised Edition. Rev. ed. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baciu, Cornelia. 2021. Civil-Military Relations and Global Security Governance Strategy, Hybrid Orders and the Case of Pakistan. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Badie, Bertrand. 2011. La diplomatie de connivence: Les dérives oligarchiques du système international. Paris: La découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry, Peter Dombrowski, and Simon Reich. 2019. “Is Grand Strategy a Research Program? A Review Essay.” Security Studies 28 (1): 58–86. doi:10.1080/09636412.2018.1508631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry, Peter J. Dombrowski, and Simon Reich. 2019. Comparative Grand Strategy: A Framework and Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49 (3): 401–429. doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biscop, Sven. 2018. European Strategy in the 21st Century: New Future for Old Power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, Sven. 2021. Grand Strategy in 10 Words: A Guide to Great Power Politics in the 21st Century. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, Sven, and Jo Coelmont. 2012. Europe, Strategy and Armed Forces: The Making of a Distinctive Power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blagden, David. 2015. “Global Multipolarity, European Security and Implications for UK Grand Strategy: Back to the Future, once Again.” International Affairs 91 (2): 333–350. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker. 2021. “Hybrid Political Orders and Customary Peace.” In The Oxford Handbook of Peacebuilding, Statebuilding, and Peace Formation, edited by Richmond, Oliver P. and Gëzim Visoka, 612–626. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brands, Hal. 2016. Making the Unipolar Moment: US Foreign Policy and the Rise of the Post-Cold War Order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society a Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, Jeff D., and Robert O. Keohane. ”The Liberal Order is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither.” Foreign Affairs 96 (3): 36–40, 42–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44823729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, Alexander, and Daniel H. Nexon. 2020. Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville, A., and H. Reeve. 1889. Democracy in America. London, New York: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, Trine. 2016. “The Coming Multi-Order World.” Contemporary Security Policy 37 (1): 3–30. doi:10.1080/13523260.2016.1150053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, Francis. 1996. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grevi, Giovani. 2009. ”The Interpolar World: A New Scenario.” Occasional Paper N° 79 . Paris: EUISS.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, Farrell, andAbraham L. Newman. 2019. “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion.” International Security 44 (1): 42–79. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz, John H. 2003. “The Security Dilemma in International Relations: Background and Present Problems.” International Relations 17 (4): 411–416. doi:10.1177/0047117803174001.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Stephanie C. 2019. “The Politics of Overlapping Organizations: Hostage-Taking, Forum-Shopping and Brokering.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (6): 883–905. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1512644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. John. 2009. “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. 2012. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. 2020. A World Safe for Democracy: Liberal Internationalism and the Crises of Global Order. Politics and Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Beate. 2000. The Cultural Construction of International Relations: The Invention of the State of Nature. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Beate. 2017. “The Imperial Origins of Social and Political Thought”. In International Origins of Social and Political Theory, edited by Barkawi, Tarak and George Lawson, 9–35. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Beate. 2018. “Liberal Internationalism: Historical Trajectory and Current Prospects.” International Affairs 94 (1): 43–61. doi:10.1093/ia/iix231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kilroy, Walt. 2021. “Social Capital and Peace.” In the Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace, edited by Standish, Katerina, Heather Devere, Adan Suazo, and Rachel Rafferty, 1–19. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, Charles P. 1981. “Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides.” International Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 242. doi:10.2307/2600355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International Regimes. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laatikainen, Katie V. 2012. EU Multilateralism in a Multipolar World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lissner, Rebecca F. 2018. “What Is Grand Strategy? Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield (November 2018).”
   Google Scholar
• London School of Economics (LSE). 2021. “‘World on the Edge’: The Crisis of the Western Liberal Order.” Accessed 13 June 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S9cOeYV-n8
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John J. 2019. “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order.” International Security 43 (4): 7–50. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermann, Falk. 2017. “France’s Reluctant Parliamentarisation of Military Deployments: The 2008 Constitutional Reform in Practice.” West European Politics 40 (1): 101–118. doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1244751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Patrick. 2020. The False Promise of Liberal Order: Nostalgia, Delusion and the Rise of Trump. Cambridge, Medford MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. 2015. “The Dilemmas of a Hybrid Peace: Negative or Positive?” Cooperation and Conflict 50 (1): 50–68. doi:10.1177/0010836714537053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. 2016. Peace Formation and Political Order in Conflict Affected Societies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P. 2017. “The Paradox of Peace and Power: Contamination or Enablement?” International Politics 54 (5): 637–658. doi:10.1057/s41311-017-0053-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Audra Mitchell. 2012. Hybrid Forms of Peace: From Everyday Agency to Post-Liberalism. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P., and Gëzim Visoka, eds. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of Peacebuilding, Statebuilding, and Peace Formation. New York: Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholte, Jan A., Soetkin Verhaegen, and Jonas Tallberg. 2021. “Elite Attitudes and the Future of Global Governance.” International Affairs 97 (3): 861–886. doi:10.1093/ia/iiab034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, Joseph A. 2010. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silove, Nina. 2018. “Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of 'Grand Strategy'”.” Security Studies 27 (1): 27–57. doi:10.1080/09636412.2017.1360073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Luis. 2013. Geopolitical Change, Grand Strategy and European Security. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael E. 2011. “A Liberal Grand Strategy in a Realist World? Power, Purpose and the EU’s Changing Global Role.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 144–163. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.544487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Ken G., Walter J. Ferrier, and Hermann Ndofor. 2005. “Competitive Dynamics Research”. In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, edited by Hitt, Michael A. 309–354. Oxford: Blackwell Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, Christoph 2019. “Social Cohesion and Economic Development: Unpacking the Relationship.” Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.
   Google Scholar
• Stengel, Frank A. 2020. The Politics of Military Force: Antimilitarism, Ideational Change, and Post-Cold War German Security Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szewczyk, Bart M. J. 2021. Europe’s Grand Strategy: Navigating a New World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vergolini, Loris. 2011. “Social Cohesion in Europe: How Do the Different Dimensions of Inequality Affect Social Cohesion?” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 52 (3): 197–214. doi:10.1177/0020715211405421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visoka, Gëzim. 2016. Peace Figuration after International Intervention: Intentions, Events and Consequences of Liberal Peacebuilding. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, Ole. 2017. “International Leadership after the Demise of the Last Superpower: System Structure and Stewardship.” Chinese Political Science Review 2 (4): 452–476. doi:10.1007/s41111-017-0086-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Wolfgang, Anna Herranz-Surrallés, Juliet Kaarbo, and Falk Ostermann. 2018. “Party Politics at the Water’s Edge: Contestation of Military Operations in Europe.” European Political Science Review 10 (4): 537–563. doi:10.1017/S1755773918000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. [2008] 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston, London: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Michael C., and Stephen D. Krasner. 1989. “Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment.” Review of International Studies 15 (2): 183–198. doi:10.1017/S0260210500112999.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander. 2003. “Why a World State is Inevitable.” European Journal of International Relations 9 (4): 491–542. doi:10.1177/135406610394001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2017. “A Theory of Contestation—A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts.” Polity 49 (1): 109–125. doi:10.1086/690100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, Neil. 2013. “European Union Grand Strategy and Defense: Strategy, Sovereignty, and Political Union.” International Affairs Forum 4 (2): 174–179. doi:10.1080/23258020.2013.864887.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, William C. 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security 24 (1): 5–41. doi:10.1162/016228899560031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar