Conclusion: interpolarity - bridging international relations with a dilemma

References

• Acharya, A. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58 (2): 239–275. doi:10.1017/S0020818304582024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. 2011. “Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism and Rule-Making the Third World.” International Studies Quarterly 5591 (1): 95–123. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. 2016. “Rethinking Demand, Purpose and Progress in Global Governance: An Introduction.” In Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, edited by Acharya, A., 1–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., and B. Buzan. 2007. “Why There Is No non-Western IR Theory? An Introduction.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7 (3): 287–312. doi:10.1093/irap/lcm012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baciu, C. 2022. “Interpolarity. Re-visiting security and the global order” Defence Studies 22 (4): 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110482.
   Google Scholar
• Baciu, C, and N.M. Ewers-Peters. 2022. “Differentiated Integration and Role Conceptions in Security Orders: A Comparative Study of France, Germany, Ireland and Romania.” Defence Studies 22 (4): 666–688.
   Google Scholar
• Baciu, C., and K. Kotzé. 2022. “Mimesis and Status Seeking in the Global Order: BRICS Summit Diplomacy and Performative Practices.” Defence Studies 22 (4): 709–735.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P. 2008. “Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR.” Third World Quarterly 29 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1080/01436590701726392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P. 2010. “The Western Centricism of Security Studies: ‘Blind Spot or Constitutive Practice?” Security Dialogue 41 (6): 615–622. doi:10.1177/0967010610388208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P. 2021. “How Not to Globalise IR: ‘ Centre’ and ‘ Periphery’ as Constitutive of the International.” Uluslararasi Iliskiler 18 (70): 13–27. doi:10.33458/uidergisi.960548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2021. “Cancelling the West. Transatlantic Relations in the Era of Culture Wars.” Global Affairs 7 (3): 311–325. doi:10.1080/23340460.2021.1952469.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 2016. “Could IR Be Different?” International Studies Review 18 (1): 155–157. doi:10.1093/isr/viv025.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. and X. Gao. 2022. “Role Enactment and the Contestation of Global Cybersecurity Governance.” Defence Studies 22 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Cladi, L. 2022. “Persevering with Bandwagoning, Not Hedging: Why European Security Cooperation Still Conforms to Realism.” Defence Studies 22 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A.F., E Parlar Dal, and B. Cannon. 2022. “The Cascading Dynamics of Informal Institutions: Organisational Processes and Governance Implications.” International Politics. doi:10.1057/s41311-022-00399-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deni, J.R. 2022. “European Strategies in Post-Pandemic Peer Competition: Implications for America.” Defence Studies 22 (4): 644–665.
   Google Scholar
• Deschaux-Dutard, D. 2022. “French-German Defence Cooperation Post Brexit: Moving European Strategic Autonomy Forward?” Defence Studies 22 (4): 591–608.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Onar, N., and K. Nicolaïdis. 2013. “The Decentring Agenda: Europe as a Post-Colonial Power.” Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 283–303. doi:10.1177/0010836713485384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France 24, (2022). Russia Isolated at G20 as Lavrov Storms Out of Talks. 8 July, Availabe from: https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20220708-live-ukraine-at-top-of-agenda-at-g20-meetings-in-bali
   Google Scholar
• Heinämäki, L. 2022. “Indigenous Peoples’ Environmental Human rights-from Objects of Protection Towards Stewardship: Assessment of Current International Standards.” In Research Handbook on the International Law of Indigenous Rights, edited by Newman, D.G., 169–201, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• High North News. 2022. Arctic Council Paused: The Search for a Future for Arctic Cooperation Continues. 27 April, Availabe from: https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/arctic-council-paused-search-future-arctic-cooperation-continues
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. 2016. “Who Is Liberal Now? Rising Powers and Global Norms.” In Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, edited by Acharya, A., 55–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavalski, E. 2018. “Guanxi or What Is the Chinese for Relational Theory of World Politics.” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 18: 397–420. doi:10.1093/irap/lcy008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S., and S. Lecocq. 2018. “Operationalising the Decentring Agenda: Analysing European Foreign Policy in a non-European and post-Western World.” Cooperation and Conflict 53 (2): 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S., S. Lecocq, and F Volpi. 2021. “Decentring Norms in EU Relations with the Southern Neighbourhood.” Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (4): 891–908. doi:10.1111/jcms.13121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. 2016. “Living Well with the Earth: Indigenous Rights and the Environment.” In Routledge Handbook of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights, edited by Lennox, C. and D. Short, 167–180. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, G.R. 2022. “Transatlantic Cooperation in Flux: Europe’s Small and Groping Steps Towards ‘Strategic Autonomy.” Defence Studies 22 (4): 609–623.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Temby. 2015. “What are Levels of Analysis and What Do They Contribute to International Relations Theory?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28 (4): 721–742. doi:10.1080/09557571.2013.831032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, P, J. Baylis, and S Smith. 2020. From International Politics to World Politics in the Globalisation of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, eds. Baylis, J., S. Smith, and P. Owens, 5–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parlar Dal, E. 2019. “Status Competition and Russing Powers in Global Governance: An Introduction.” Contemporary Politics 25 (5): 499–511. doi:10.1080/13569775.2019.1627767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlar Dal, E., and S. Dipama. 2022. “Rising Powers’ Quest for Increased Legitimacy through IOs in an Era of Loose Multilateralism.” Contemporary Politics 1–29. doi:10.1080/13569775.2021.2023269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K. 2016. “Human Rights.” In Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, edited by Acharya, A., 121–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J.D. 1961. “The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations.” World Politics 14 (1): 77–92. doi:10.2307/2009557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, R. 2012. “Emerging Powers and the Responsibility to Protect after Libya.” Norwegian Institute for International Affairs (NUPI) Policy Brief 15.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, R. 2016. “Atrocity Crimes.” In Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, edited by Acharya, A., 138–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trownsell, T, et. al. 2019. Recrafting International Relations through Relationality, Availabe from: https://www.e-ir.info/2019/01/08/recrafting-international-relations-through-relationality/
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S., D. Gazsi, Huber, D., and N. Fisher‐Onar. 2022. “How to Reflexively Decenter EU Foreign Policy: Dissonance and Contrapuntal Reconstruction in Migration, Religious and Neighbourhood Governance.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. doi:10.1111/jcms.13335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar