Ungentlemanly conduct daring and determination in information manoeuvre

References

• Almäng, Jan. 2019. “War, Vagueness and Hybrid War.” Defence Studies 19 (2): 199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1597631.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, Evans, and Joachim I. Krueger. 2009. “The Psychology (And Economics) of Trust.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 9 (3): 1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00232.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Paul. 2021. “Clearing the Jungle: Conceptualising Trust and Trustworthiness.” In Trust Matters, edited by de Freitas, Raquel Barradas and Sergio Lo Iaconon, 17–34. Oxford (UK): Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blattman, Christopher. 2022. Why We Fight: The Roots of War and the Paths to Peace. New York, NY (USA): Penguin Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwmeester, Han. 2020. Krym Nash: An Analysis of Modern Russian Deception Warfare. [PhD diss]., Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Bredlau, Susan. 2019. “On Perception and Trust: Merleau-Ponty and the Emotional Significance of Our Relations with Each Other.” Continental Philosophy Review 52 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-016-9367-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Cree, Alice, and Mona Lotten. 2018. The Value of Trust: How Trust Is Earned and Why it Matters. London (UK): British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cancian, Mark. 2018. Coping with Surprise in Great Power Conflicts. Washington, DC (USA): Center for Strategic and International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Nicholas. 2015. “Keynote Speech, RUSI Land Warfare Conference 2015.” 9 February 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41fGtrz-fdI.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Martin. 2016. “Ethical Issues in Targeting.” In Targeting: The Challenges of Modern Warfare, edited by Ducheine, Paul, Michael Schmitt, and Frans Osinga, 147–158. The Hague (NLD): T.M.C. Asser Press/Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Demus, Alyssa, and Christopher Paul. 2022. “Don’t Sleep on Russian Information-War Capabilities.” RAND Corporation, 5 April. https://www.rand.org/blog/2022/04/dont-sleep-on-russian-information-war-capabilities.html.
   Google Scholar
• De Sola Pool, Ithiel. 1970. “The Kaiser, the Tsar, and the Computer: Information Processing in a Crisis.” In Readings on the International Political System, edited by Rosenbaum, Naomi, 91–107. Englewood Cliffs, NJ (USA): Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ducheine, Paul, Jelle van Haaster, and Richard van Harskamp. 2017. “Manoeuvring and Generating Effects in the Information Environment.” In Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2017, Winning without Killing: The Strategic and Operational Utility of Non-Kinetic Capabilities in Crises, edited by Ducheine, Paul and Frans Osinga, 155–179. The Hague (NLD): Springer/T.M.C. Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Cluzel, François. 2020. Cognitive Warfare. Norfolk, VA (USA): Innovation Hub, Allied Command Transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Eiser, Richard, and Mathew White. 2005. “A Psychological Approach to Understanding How Trust Is Built and Lost in the Context of Risk.” In Paper presented at the SCARR Conference, London School of Economics (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY (USA): Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, Jeremy. 2022. “The Head of GCHQ Says Vladimir Putin Is Losing the Information War in Ukraine.” The Economist, August 18. https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2022/08/18/the-head-of-gchq-says-vladimir-putin-is-losing-the-information-war-in-ukraine.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lawrence. 2022. Command: The Politics of Military Operations from Korea to Ukraine. New York, NY (USA): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, Ofer, Vitaly Kabernik, and Francesca Granelli, ed. 2022. Info Ops: From World War I to the Twitter Era. Boulder, CO (USA): Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer, Bronwyn. 2018. “Storytelling That Moves People: Unite an Idea with an Emotion.” In Influence and Persuasion, Emotional Intelligence, edited by McKee, Robert, 91–114. Boston, MS (USA): Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, E. Bruce. 2010. Encyclopedia of Perception. Thousand Oaks, CA (USA): SAGE Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Dean, III, and Kenneth Jobson. 2021. Cognitive Superiority: Information to Power. Cham (CHE): Springer Nature Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Haven, Kendall. 2014. Story Smart: Using the Science of Story to Persuade, Influence, Inspire, and Teach. Santa Barbare, CA (USA): Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Benjamon. 2021. Why Trust Matters: An Economist’s Guide to the Ties That Bind Us. New York, NY (USA): Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ (USA): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Christian, and William Marcellino. 2021. Bad Actors in News Reporting: Tracking News Manipulation by State Actors. Santa Monica, CA (USA): RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, Andrew Rosenfield, Linnea Gandhi, and Tom Blaser. 2016. “Noise: How to Overcome the High, Hidden Cost of Inconsistent Decision Making.” Harvard Business Review 94 (10): 36–43. https://hbr.org/2016/10/noise.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel, Olivcer Sibony, and Cass Sunstein. 2021. Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. New York, NY (USA): Little Brown Spark, Hachette Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kiszely, John. 1998. “The Meaning of Manoeuvre.” The RUSI Journal 143 (6): 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071849808446326.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzen, Martijn. 2012. “Western Military Culture and Counter-Insurgency: An Ambiguous Reality.” Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies 40 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.5787/40-1-982.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblich, Günther, and Natalie Sebanz. 2006. “The Social Nature of Perception and Action.” Current Directions of Social Science 3 (15): 103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00415.x.
   Google Scholar
• Koffka, Kurt. 2001. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London (UK): Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Korteling, Johan, Anne-Marie Brouwer, Karel van den Bosch, and Alexander Toet. 2016. Neurowetenschappelijke Mechanismen van Cognitieve Bias [Neuro Scientifically Mechanisms of Cognitive Bias]. Soesterberg (NLD): TNO, Earth, Life & Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Leonhard, Robert. 1991. The Art of Maneuver: Maneuver Warfare Theory and AirLand Battle. Novato, CA (USA): Presidio Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Margaret, and Laura Stoker. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 475–476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manwaring, Rob, and Josh Holloway. 2022. “Resilience to Cyber-Enabled Foreign Interference: Citizen Understanding and Threat Perceptions.” Defence Studies 23 (2): 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2138349.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Roger, James Davis, and David Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrated Model of Organizational Trust.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 712. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McChrystal, Stanley, and Anna Butrico. 2021. Risk: A User’s Guide. New York, NY (USA): Portfolio/Penguin, Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Jack. 2021. “Remote Warfare and the Legitimacy of Military Capabilities.” Defence Studies 21 (4): 538. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2021.1902315.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. Harrison, and Norman Chervany. 2000. “What Is Trust? A Conceptual Analysis and an Interdisciplinary Model.” AMCIS 2000 Proceedings, Long Beach, CA (USA), 382–827.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, Robert. 1995. “The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect.” Social Forces 4 (2): 379–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580486.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, Jennifer, and Randall Schweller. 2011. “Knowing the Unknown Unknowns: Misplaced Certainty and the Onset of War.” Security Studies 20 (1): 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2011.549023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh, Shimon. 2004. In Pursuit of Military Excellence: The Evolution of Operational Theory. Abingdon (UK): Frank Cass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands Army, Royal. 2016. “Informatie als Wapen. Middel en Doel [Information as Weapon, Means and Purpose]. White Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, Jonathan. 2021. “Trust in Public Institutions: Trends and Implication for Economic Security.” In Policy Brief No, 1–4. Vol. 108. New York, NY (USA): United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://doi.org/10.18356/27081990-108.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 2021. Rationality: What it Is, Why it Seems Scarce, Why it Matters. Toronto (CA): Viking/Penguin Random House LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Rittenhofer, Iris, and Karen Klitgaard Povlsen. 2015. “Organics, Trust, and Credibility: A Management and Media Research Perspective.” Ecology and Society 20 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07169-200106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Denise, Sim Sitkin, Ronald Burt, and Colin Camerer. 1998. “Not so Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Netherlands Army. 2020. Information-Driven Operations for the Royal Netherlands Army. Utrecht (NLD): Royal Netherlands Army.
   Google Scholar
• Schwille, Michael, Jonathan Welch, Scott Fisher, Thomas Whittaker, and Christopher Paul. 2021. Handbook for Tactical Operations in the Information Environment. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Steinman, Robert, Zygmunt Pizlob, and Filip Pizlob. 2000. “Phi Is Not Beta, and Why Wertheimer’s Discovery Launched the Gestalt Revolution.” Vision Research 40 (17): 2257–2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00086-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, William, and Dorothy Thomas. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. New York, NY (USA): Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Toet, Alexander, Anne-Marie Brouwer, and Johan Korteling. 2016. Effects of Personal Characteristics, Mental State and External Factors on Susceptibility to Bias: A Literature Study. Soesterberg (NLD): TNO Earth, Life & Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• UK’s Chief of the General Staff. 2017. Army Doctrine Publication: Land Operations. London (UK): Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Usó-Doménech, Joseph Louis, and Josue Nescolarde-Selva. 2016. “What Are Belief Systems?” Foundation of Science 21 (1): 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9409-z.
   Google Scholar
• Zabrodskyi, Mykhaylo, Jack Watling, Oleksandr Danylyuk, and Nick Reynolds. 2022. Preliminary Lessons in Conventional Warfighting from Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: February-July 2022. London (UK): Royal United Service Institute.
   Google Scholar