Animal geographies: an international state of the field survey

References

• Animal Geographies Research Cluster. (n.d.). Animal geographies research cluster. Cardiff University. https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/research/explore/research-units/animal-geographies-research-cluster.
   Google Scholar
• Animal Geographies/Vital Geographies Group. (n.d.). Vital geographies: Animal geographies. University of Cambridge. https://www.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/vital/.
   Google Scholar
• Animal Geography Specialty Group of the American Association of Geographers. (n.d.). Animal Geography Specialty Group. https://www.animalgeography.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Arnould, P. (1994). La recherche française en biogéographie. Bulletin de l'Association de Géographes Français, 71(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.3406/bagf.1994.1764
   Google Scholar
• Bear, C. (2011). Thinking like a fish? Engaging with nonhuman difference through recreational angling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(2), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1068/d1810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhammou, F. (2016). Une histoire contemporaine de la géographie française de l’animal. In D. Chartier, & E. Rodary (Eds.), Manifeste pour une géographie environnementale (pp. 141–116). Presses de Sciences Po « Académique ».
   Google Scholar
• Benhammou, F., & Sierra, P. (2017). Epistémologie de la géographie des animaux en France : de la biogéographie à la géopolitique. Historiens et Géographes numéro spécial FIG : Territoires humains, mondes animaux, 439, 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. F. (1960). Cultural animal geography: An inviting field of research. Professional Geographer, 13(2), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1961.132_13.x
   Google Scholar
• Berthier, A. (2019). Oiseaux urbains ? Les conditions d'une cohabitation humains – animaux dans le Grand Paris. thèse de doctorat en géographie, Université Paris-1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 433 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. A. Bhattacherjee under Creative Commons License. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, N., & Cohen, M. (2002). L’animal: Une figure de la géographie contemporaine. In J. F. Staszak (Ed.), La Place de L’animal (pp. 25–40). L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Boisseron, B. (2018). Afro-dog: Blackness and the animal question. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bortolamiol, S., Cohen, M., Jiguet, F., Pennec, F., Seguya, A., & Krief, S. (2016). Chimpanzee non-avoidance of hyper-proximity with humans. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 80(5), 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.1072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolamiol, S., Raymond, R., & Simon, L. (2017). Territoires des humains et territoires des animaux: Éléments de réflexions pour une géographie animale. Annales de Géographie, 716(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.716.0387
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M., Hall, R., & Sidaway, J. (2019). Reappraising David Livingstone’s The Geographical Tradition: A quarter of a century on. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(3), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, J., Holmberg, T., & Åsberg, C. (2018). Animal places: Lively cartographies of human-animal relations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, H. (2014). Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513479295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, H. (2015). Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514527401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, H. (2016). Animal geographies III: Ethics. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515580489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claval, P. (1970). L'influence de la géographie physique et de la géographique naturelle sur les concepts et les méthodes de la géographie humaine. Revue géographique des Pyrénées et du Sud-Ouest, 41(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.3406/rgpso.1970.2263
   Google Scholar
• Collard, R.-C. (2020). Animal traffic: Lively capital in the global exotic pet trade. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estebanez, J. (2021). Les animaux en géographie. Généalogie et enjeux. In V. Clément, M. Stock, & A. Volvey (Eds.), Mouvements de géographie. Une science sociale aux tournants (pp. 105–113). Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Estebanez, J., Gouabault, E., & Michalon, J. (2013). Où sont les animaux ? Vers une géographie humanimale. Carnets de géographe, 5. https://www.carnetsdegeographes.org/carnets_debats/debat_05_01_Estebanez_Gouabault-Michalon.php.
   Google Scholar
• Feinerer, I., Hornik, K., & Meyer, D. (2008). Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows, I. (2018). Wordcloud: Word clouds. R package version 2.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. (2021). Animal geographies II: Killing and caring (in times of crisis). Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520942295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. (2022). COVID-19 and the animals. Geographical Research, 60(2), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. M. (2020). Animal geographies I: Hearing the cry and extending beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519863483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K. (2018). The Cow with the Ear Tag #1389. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K. (2021). The afterlives of the lively commodity: Life-worlds, death-worlds, rotting-worlds. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(2), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20944417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K., & Collard, R. C. (Eds.). (2015). Critical Animal Geographies: Politics, Intersections and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K., & Narayanan, Y. (2020). Introduction: Animal nationalisms: Multispecies cultural politics, race, and the (un)making of the settler nation-state. Special Issue of the Journal For Intercultural Studies, 41(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2019.1704379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, R. (2021). Animal geographies in a pandemic. In G. J. Andrews (Ed.), COVID-19 and similar futures, global perspectives on health geography (pp. 207–212). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, P., McGregor, A., Springer, S., Veron, O., & White, R. (Eds.). (2022). Vegan geographies: Spaces beyond violence, ethics beyond speciesism. Lantern Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgetts, T., & Lorimer, J. (2015). Methodologies for animals’ geographies: Cultures, communication and genomics. Cultural Geography, 22(2), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014525114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, S. P. (2023). An other: A black feminist consideration of animal life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. (2017). Animal geographies I: Globalizing and decolonizing. Progress in Human Geography, 41(3), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516646291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. (2018). Animal geographies II: Hybridizing. Progress in Human Geography, 42(3), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517699924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. (2019). Animal geographies III: Species relations of power. Progress in Human Geography, 43(4), 749–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518775837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. (2020). Animal geographies. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography, 2nd edition. vol. 1 (pp. 127–132). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, P., & Taves, I. (2021). The curious case of the Croydon cat-killer: Producing predators in the multi-species metropolis. Social & Cultural Geography, 22(8), 1043–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1681022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. (2017). Wilderness protected areas: Management guidelines for IUCN category 1b protected areas. International Union for the Conservation of Nature. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/pag-025.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. (2008). Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508089825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. J. (2015). Dangerous crossings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. (1992). The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J., & Srinivasan, K. (2013). Animal geographies. In N. C. Johnson, R. H. Schein, & J. Winders (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell companion to cultural geography (pp. 332–342). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, G., Sierra, P., & Benhammou, F. (2020). La géographie animale française et sa trajectoire dans l’appréhension des territoires plus-qu’humains. In A. Choné, I. Iribarren, M. Pelé, C. Repussard, & C. Sueur (Eds.), Les études animales sont-elles bonnes à penser? Repenser les sciences, reconfigurer les disciplines (pp. 169–192). L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. (2012). Compassion, geography, and the question of the animal. Environmental Values, 21(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327112X13303670567215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miele, M., & Bear, C. (2022). Geography and posthumanism. In S. Herbrechter, I. Callus, M. Rossini, M. Grech, M. de Bruin-Molé, & C. J. Müller (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of critical posthumanism (pp. 749–771). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Milhaud, O. (2005). Y a-t-il une géographie du territoire animal?. Compte Rendu Du Café Géo-graphique. www.cafe-geo.net/wp-content/uploads/geographie-territoire-animal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (Eds.). (2000). Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Geographic Society (RGS). (2023). Changes to society research and working groups. https://www.rgs.org/geography/news/changes-to-society-research-and-working-groups/.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, K. (2020). Human-animal studies: Remembering the past, celebrating the present, troubling the future. Society & Animals, 28(7), 797–833. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-BJA10029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierra, P., Marchand, P., & Benhammou, F. (2019). Repenser la nature sauvage avec la géographie animale. Bulletin de l’association de géographes français, 96(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.4000/bagf.4886
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, K. (2016). Towards a political animal geography? Political Geography, 50, 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, K. (2022). Re-animalising wellbeing: Multispecies justice after development. The Sociological Review, 70(2), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261221084781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Lives of Animals Research Group. (n.d.). The Lives of Animals Research Group. York University. https://livesofanimals.info.yorku.ca/.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. (1984). Dominance and affection: The making of pets. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanik, J. (2012). Placing animals: An introduction to the geography of human-animal relations. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanik, J., & Bortolamiol, S. (2022). Defining animal geography: An international perspective. The Animal Geography Specialty Group. https://www.animalgeography.org/blog/.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanik, J., & Hovorka, A. (2022). Animal geographies in the time of COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. In S. Brunn, & D. Gilbreath (Eds.), COVID-19 and the World of Ad Hoc Geographies (pp. 2307–2325). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. (2015). Animal geographies, anarchist praxis and critical animal studies. In K. Gillespie, & R.-C. Collard (Eds.), Critical animal geographies: Politics, intersections, and hierarchies in a multispecies world (pp. 19–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbert, C. (2009). Animal geographies. In R. Kitchin, & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 122–126). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S., & Rutherford, S. (2018). Historical animal geographies. Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. (1996). Zoöpolis. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 7(2), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759609358677
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (1995). Bringing the animals back in. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 13(6), 632–636. https://doi.org/10.1068/d130735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (Eds.). (1998). Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., Emel, J., & Wilbert, C. (2003). Reanimating cultural geography. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 184–206). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., West, K., & Gaines, T. E. (1995). Transspecies urban theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(6), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1068/d130735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar