2,528
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self‐assessment

, &
Pages 273-290 | Published online: 17 Feb 2007

References

References

  • Balla , J and Boyle , P . 1994 . Assessment of student performance: a framework for improving practices . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 19 ( 1 ) : 17 – 28 .
  • Black , P . 1995 . Can teachers use assessment to improve learning . British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment , 5 ( 2 ) : 7 – 11 .
  • Black , P and Wiliam , D . 1998 . Assessment and classroom learning . Assessment in Education , 5 ( 1 ) : 7 – 74 .
  • Briggs , J . 1998 . Assessment and classroom learning: a role for summative assessment? . Assessment in Education , 5 ( 1 ) : 103 – 110 .
  • Cooper , N . 2000 . Facilitating learning from formative feedback in level 3 assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 ( 3 ) : 279 – 291 .
  • Cowie , B and Bell , B . 1999 . A model for formative assessment . Assessment in Education , 6 ( 1 ) : 101 – 116 .
  • Dochy , F , Segers , M and Sluijsmans , D . 1999 . The use of self‐, peer and co‐assessment in higher education: a review . Studies in Higher Education , 24 ( 3 ) : 331 – 350 .
  • Ecclestone , K . 1999 . Empowering or ensnaring?: the implications of outcomes‐based assessment in higher education . Higher Education Quarterly , 53 ( 1 ) : 29 – 48 .
  • Fallows , S and Chandramohan , B . 2001 . Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self assessment . Teaching in Higher Education , 6 ( 2 ) : 229 – 245 .
  • Gosling D Moon J 2001 How to use learning outcomes and assessment criteria (London, Southern England Consortium for Credit Accumulation and Transfer)
  • Harlen , W and James , M . 1997 . Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment . Assessment in Education , 4 ( 3 ) : 365 – 379 .
  • Higgins , R , Hartley , P and Skelton , A . 2001 . Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback . Teaching in Higher Education , 6 ( 2 ) : 269 – 274 .
  • Miller AH Bradford WI Cox K 1998 Student assessment in higher education (London, Kogan Page)
  • O'Donovan , B , Rust , C and Price , M . 2001 . The student experience of criterion‐referenced assessment through the introduction of a common criteria assessment grid . Innovation in Education and Teaching International , 38 ( 1 ) : 38 – 43 .
  • Orsmond , P , Merry , S and Reiling , K . 1996 . The importance of marking criteria in peer assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 21 ( 3 ) : 239 – 249 .
  • Orsmond , P , Merry , S and Reiling , K . 1997 . A study in self‐assessment: tutor and students' perceptions of performance criteria . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 22 ( 4 ) : 357 – 369 .
  • Orsmond , P , Merry , S and Reiling , K . 2000 . The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 25 ( 1 ) : 23 – 38 .
  • Orsmond , P , Merry , S and Reiling , K . 2002 . The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student‐derived marking criteria in peer and self assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 27 ( 4 ) : 309 – 323 .
  • Ramaprasad , A . 1983 . On the definition of feedback . Behavioural Science , 28 : 4 – 13 .
  • Sadler , DR . 1989 . Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems . Instructional Science , 18 : 119 – 144 .
  • Sadler , DR . 1998 . Formative assessment: revisiting the territory . Assessment in Education , 5 ( 1 ) : 77 – 84 .
  • Sokal RR Rohlf FJ 1981 Biometry (San Francisco, CA, W. H. Freeman and Company)
  • Somervell , H . 1993 . Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self‐, peer and collaborative assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 18 ( 3 ) : 221 – 233 .
  • Wiliam , D and Black , P . 1996 . Meanings and consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? . British Educational Research Journal , 22 ( 5 ) : 537 – 548 .
  • Yorke , M , Bridges , P and Woolf , H . 2000 . Mark distribution and marketing practices in UK higher education . Active Learning in Higher Education , 1 ( 1 ) : 7 – 27 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.