Effects of online college student’s Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance

References

• Artino, A. R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students’ satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Aşkar, P., & Davenport, D. (2009). An investigation of factors related to self-efficacy for java programming among engineering students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M., & Kydd, C. (1997). Individual characteristics associated with world wide web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28, 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computer in Human Behavior, 20, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beffa-Negrini, P., Cohen, N. L., & Miller, B. (2002). Strategies to motivate students in online learning environments. Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior, 34, 334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, P. D. (2007). Predictors of college student achievement in undergraduate asynchronous web-based courses. Education, 127, 523–533.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 353–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. S. (2000). The effect of attitudes and self-efficacy on college student performance in online instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ChanLin, L. J. (2009). Applying motivational analysis in a web-based course. Innovations in Education and Training International, 46, 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). Gender differences in Taiwan university students’ attitudes toward web-based learning. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 645–654.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6, 118–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabaj, F. (2009). The role of gender and age on students’ perceptions towards online education. Case study: Sakarya University, vocational high school. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 120–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computer in Human Behavior, 18, 521–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federico, P. (2001). Academic departments and student attitudes toward different dimensions of web-based education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. (2000). Constructing the information society: Women, information technology, and design. Technology in Society, 22, 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H., & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computer in Human Behavior, 19, 443–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İşman, A., & Çelikli, G. E. (2009). How does student ability and self-efficacy affect the usage of computer technology? The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. L., Gardner, P. D., & Schmit, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999, 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J., Lane, A. M., & Kyprianou, A. (2004). Self-efficacy, self-esteem, and their impact on academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S. S. (2002). Understanding user perceptions of world-wide web environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F. (2007). Developing a personal and group-based learning portfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 1117–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., & Chang, Y. F. (2010). Gender differences in usage, satisfaction, self-efficacy, and performance of blogging. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, C. H. (2010). The survey study of mathematics motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MMSLQ) for grade 10–12 Taiwanese students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. S. (2010). Student satisfaction and self-efficacy in a cooperative robotics course. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 1135–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, A., LaFrance, B., & McCullough, S. (2001). Differences in attitudes between women and men toward computerization. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 227–244.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, D., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environment: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79, 576–600. doi:10.3102/0034654308326083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy belief in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Tsai, C. C., & Wu, Y. T. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: The role of students’ perceptions of the Internet. Educational Studies, 32, 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potosky, D. (2002). A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: The role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computer in Human Behavior, 18, 241–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenge stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 349–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Grau, R. M., Cifre, E., & Llorens, S. (2000). Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: The moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 575–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaran, S. R., & Tung, B. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: A studies in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28, 191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, R. V. (2000). Motivation in instruction design. Teacher Librarian, 27, 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Song, S. H. & Keller, J. M. (1999). The ARCS model for developing motivationally-adaptive computer-assisted instruction. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and their online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practices, 25, 805–818.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. (2009). Examining the relationship between student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their intended uses of technology for teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8, 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. F., Meriac, J. P., & Cope, J. G. (2002). Motivating online performance: The influence of goal setting and Internet self-efficacy. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topkaya, E. Z. (2010). Pre-service English language teachers’ perceptions of computer self-efficacy and general self-efficacy. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 143–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. P. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51, 1589–1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology (8th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ Internet attitudes and Internet self-efficacy: A study at three universities in Taiwan. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 441–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie, K., Debacker, T. K., & Perguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 67–89.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., & McSporran, M. (2001, June). Confident men – successful women: Gender difference in online learning. In C. Montgomerie, & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2001 conference (pp. 2110–2112). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar