Going URB@N: exploring the impact of undergraduate students as pedagogic researchers

References

• Blackmore, P., & Cousin, G. (2003). Linking teaching and research through research-based learning. Educational Developments, 4, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16, 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 291–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29, 261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, C. A. (2011). Student and staff perceptions of the research-teaching nexus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 313–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Being critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coate, K., Barnett, R., & Williams, G. (2001). Relationships between teaching and research in higher education in England. Higher Education Quarterly, 55, 158–174.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, E., & Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents: New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. Bristol: A joint University of Exeter/ESCalate/Higher Education Academy Publication. Retrieved from http://escalate.ac.uk/8064
   Google Scholar
• Elsen, M., Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., & van der Rijst, R. M. (2009). How to strengthen the connection between research and teaching in undergraduate university education. Higher Education Quarterly, 63, 64–85.
   Google Scholar
• Garde-Hansen, J., & Calvert, B. (2007). Developing a research culture in the undergraduate curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 709–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19, 169–189.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). Berkshire: McGrawHill/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2006). Strengthening the teaching-research linkage in undergraduate courses and programs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 10, 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York, PA: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M. (2004). Teaching and research: The idea of a nexus. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A. (2004). A guide to the research evidence on teaching-research relations. York, PA: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., Healey, M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. York, PA: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2007). What’s it really about? The scholarship of teaching and learning as authentic practice. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, K. (2006). Attitudinal and structural factors contributing to challenges in the work of the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Directions for Institutional Research, 129, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, M., & Barker, H. (2004). Students making progress and the ‘research-teaching nexus’ debate. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Teaching Fellowship Scheme Projects. (2010). Rethinking final year projects and dissertations: Creative honours and capstone projects. University of Gloucestershire. Retrieved November 30, 2011, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/projects/detail/ntfs/ntfsproject_Gloucestershire10
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M., & Winn, J. (2009). Student as producer: Reinventing the undergraduate curriculum. In M. Neary, H. Stevenson, & L. Bell (Eds.), The future of higher education: Policy, pedagogy and the student experience (pp. 192–210). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, L., & Sandover, S. (2010). Beyond ‘listening’ to the student voice: The undergraduate researcher’s contribution to the enhancement of teaching and learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 7. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol7/iss2/4/
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2007). Beyond the ‘research/teaching nexus’: Exploring the complexity of academic experience. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J., & Blackler, G. (2006). Students’ experiences of learning in a research environment. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 215–229.
   Google Scholar
• Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. E. (2010). Research-led teaching: Moving from a fractured engagement to a marriage of convenience. Higher Education Research & Development, 29, 641–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, C. B., & McAlpine, L. (2001). Making explicit the development toward the scholarship of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001, 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zamorski, B. (2002). What do students think about research? Exchange, 3, 21–22.
   Google Scholar