Conceptual frameworks in the doctoral research process: a pedagogical model

References

• Aitchison, C., Kamler, B., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2010). Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Qualifications Framework Council (2011). Australian qualifications framework. Adelaide: Australian Qualifications Framework Council (a Council of the Ministerial Council for Tertiary Education and Employment).
   Google Scholar
• Berman, J. (2001). An application of dynamic assessment to school mathematical learning (PhD thesis). University of New England, Armidale.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, J. (2013). Utility of a conceptual framework within doctoral study: A researcher’s reflections. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, J., & Graham, L. (2002). School counsellor use of curriculum-based dynamic assessment. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 12, 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (2004). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Camp, W. G. (2001). Formulating and evaluating theoretical frameworks for career and technical education research. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 26, 4–25. doi:10.5328/JVER26.1.4.
   Google Scholar
• Cooksey, R., & McDonald, G. (2011). Surviving and thriving in postgraduate research. Prahran: Tilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, D. (2011). Why reflect? Recognising the link between learning and reflection. Reflective Practice, 12, 583–584.
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37, 507–514. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, F. (2011). Cooking together disparate things: The role of metaphor in thesis writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching, 48, 429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 293–304. doi:10.1080/14703290903069001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 431–441. doi:10.1080/07294360903067930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshem, S. (2007). Thinking about conceprual frameworks in a research community of practice: A case of a doctoral programme. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 287–299. doi:10.1080/14703290701486696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 93–105. doi:10.1080/14703290601081407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J., & Loomis, D. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 241–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. W., & Smyth, R. (2010). Research supervision: The research management matrix. Higher Education, 29, 407–422. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9256-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. (2008). Writing your thesis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, H., Su, Y. J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge construction: Mobile learning redefined and a conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 171–183. doi:10.1080/14703290902843828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, R. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., & Howell Major, C. (2010). New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, P., & Tajalli, H. (2006). Intermediate theory: The missing link to successful student scholarship. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12, 313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. (2002). Knowledge, interest and the management of educational change (PhD thesis). University of New England, Armidale.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. (2004). Exploring the usefulness of a conceptual framework as a research tool: A researcher’s reflections. Issues in Educational Research, 14, 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R., & Maxwell, T. W. (2008). The research matrix: An approach to supervising higher degree research. Milperra: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational psychology. (R. Silverman, Trans.). Boca Raton, FL: St Lucie.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (2010). Making supervision work for you: A student’s guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. (2005). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., & Robinson, G. (2009). Encouraging postgraduate students of literature and art to cross conceptual thresholds. Innovations in Education and Teaching, 46, 317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, B., Graham, L., Hoskyn, M., & Berman, J. (2008). The ABCs of learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. (2003). Postgraduate research students: People in context? British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 31, 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar