Use of animation in engaging teachers and students in assessment in Hong Kong higher education

References

• Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56, 839–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S. C., Snyder, S., & Rager, R. C. (2009). An assessment of faculty usage of YouTube as a teaching resource. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 7(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. Y. (2012a). Assessment for community service types of experiential learning in the engineering discipline. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37, 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. Y. (2012b). Identifying and understanding the graduate attributes learning outcomes in a case study of community service experiential learning project. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 22, 148–159.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. Y., & Luk, L. Y. Y. (2013). Faculty perspectives on the ‘334’ curriculum reform in Hong Kong: Pros and cons. International Education Studies, 6, 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. Y., Tam, V. W., & Li, C. Y. V. (2011). A comparison of MCQ assessment delivery methods for student engagement and interaction used as an in-class formative assessment. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 48, 323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalacosta, K., Kamariotaki-Paparrigopoulou, M., Palyvos, J. A., & Spyrellis, N. (2009). Multimedia application with animated cartoons for teaching science in elementary education. Computers & Education, 52, 741–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancy, M. H., & Beichner, R. (2006). Impact of animation on assessment of conceptual understanding in physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: Strategies for using web 2.0 in teaching and learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6, 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Fralinger, B., & Owens, R. (2009). YouTube as a learning tool. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jukes, I., McCain, T. D. E., & Crockett, L. (2010). Living on the future edge: Windows on tomorrow. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Keogh, B. (1999). Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: An evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 431–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipeikiene, J., & Lipeika, A. (2006). Animation tools of CAS for dynamic exploration of mathematics. Informatics in Education, 5, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Marbach-Ad, G., Rotbain, Y., & Stavy, R. (2008). Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 273–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, S. K., & Mannan, M. A. (2004). Virtual reality simulations and animations in a web-based interactive manufacturing engineering module. Computers & Education, 43, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberto, J. (2010). Teaching & learning with the iGeneration: Perspectives, strategies, and ideas. Lifelong Faith, 4.3, 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Snelson, C., & Elison-Bowers, P. (2009). Using YouTube videos to engage the affective domain in e-learning. In A. Méndez-Vilas, A. S. Martin, J. A. M. Gonzálezm, & J. M. González (Eds.), Research, reflections and innovations in integrating ICT in education (Vol. 3, pp. 1481–1485). Badajoz: Formatex.
   Google Scholar
• Szabo, M., & Poohkay, B. (1996). An experimental study of animation, mathematics achievement, and attitude toward computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 390–402.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 597–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 521–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, E. M., Andre, T., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar