The development of a shared e-learning resource across three distinct programmes based at universities in England, Ireland and Scotland

References

• Amnesty International. (2010a). Ending female genital mutilation: A strategy for the European Union institutions. Brussels: Amnesty International.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. A. (2011). Using cost-effective multimedia to create engaging learning experiences in law and other disciplines. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Justice. (2012). Female genital mutilation act 2012. Dublin: Government of Ireland, The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Farquharson, K. (2007). Fostering friendships amongst a group of first-year university students: The use of online learning software. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 5, 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Female Genital Mutilation Act. (2003). (Commencement) Order 2004. UK: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, K., & Koohang, A. (2005). Discussion board: A learning object. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, A., Drennan, J., & Clarke, M. (2013). The changing role of academics and the rise of managerialism. In M. Barbara Khem & U. Teichler (Eds.), The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges (pp. 39 –82). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kembler, D., & McNaught, C. (2007). Enhancing university teaching: Lessons from research into award-winning teachers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, A. (2011). Internationalization or englishization: Medium of instruction in today’s universities. Hong Kong: Centre for Governance and Citizenship, The Hong Kong Institute of Education. Retrieved from http://repository.ied.edu.hk/dspace/handle/2260.2/6224
   Google Scholar
• Miers, M. E., Clarke, B. A., & Pollard, K. C. (2007). Online interprofessional learning: The student experience. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21, 529–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moule, P. (2006). E-learning for healthcare students: Developing the communities of practice framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54, 370–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullally, S., & Ní Mhuirthile, T. (2010). Reforming laws on female genital mutilation in Ireland: Responding to gaps in protection. Dublin University Law Journal, 32, 243–272.
   Google Scholar
• Raouf, S. A., Ball, T., Hughes, A., Holder, R., & Papaioannou, S. (2011). Obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women with reversed and non-reversed type III female genital mutilation International. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 113, 141–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 3, CD002213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revere, L., & Kovach, J. V. (2011). Online technologies for engaged learning a meaningful synthesis for educators. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12, 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Savery, J. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J., Creighton, S. M., & Hodes, D. (2012). Female genital mutilation: The role of health professionals in prevention, assessment, and management. British Medical Journal, 344, e1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2010). Who defines “mutilation”? Challenging imperialism in the discourse of female genital cutting. Feminist Formations, 23, 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Interdisciplinary problem-based learning: An alternative to traditional majors and minors. Liberal Education, 94, 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2011). Multi-agency practice guidelines: Female genital mutilation. UK: H.M. Government.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2011). The millennium development goals report 2011. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• US/UK Study Group. (2009). Higher education and collaboration in global context building a global civil society. A private report to Prime Minister Gordon Brown. (City of publication unspecified).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2006). WHO study group on female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. The Lancet, 367, 1835–1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011). An update on WHO’s work on female genital mutilation (FGM) (Progress Report). Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar