Enhancing international postgraduates’ learning experience with online peer assessment and feedback innovation

References

• ASKe. (2009). Assessment standards: A manifesto for change feedback: An agenda for change. ASKe, Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved from http://www.brookes.ac.uk/aske/documents/ManifestoLeafletNew.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ASke. (2011). Making peer feedback work in three easy steps! Assessment Standards Knowledge exchange 2788, Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved from http://www.brookes.ac.uk/aske/documents/2788_123-PeerFback.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (2008). Assessment issues for international students. In R. Atfield & P. Kemp (Eds.), Enhancing the international learning experience (pp. 1–13). Newbury: Threshold Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, E., Price, R., Roger, C., Blakey, K., Noblett, N., Matins, A., & Martins, I. (2010, November). Turn it in or turn it off – Confirming and disconfirming experience for innovative computer aided assessment and feedback. Proceedings of 9th European Conference on e-Learning, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Portugal, 155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., Emerson, L., & Carroll, J. (2007, September). The use of electronic detection systems for learners: Is there a pedagogic argument or are we just teaching them to cheat? Paper presented at Developing Potentials for Learning’, 12th Biennial Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), University of Szeged, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 365–377.
   Google Scholar
• Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4, 41–54.10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, E. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 304–315.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEA. (2011). Support teaching and learning – Internationalisation. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/teachingandlearning/internationalisation
   Google Scholar
• HEA Peer Assessment. (2009). Peer assessment. HLST, Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/hlst/resources/a-zdirectory/peer_assessment
   Google Scholar
• Leong, D. J., & Bodrova, E. (2007). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. NAECS/SDE: Of Primary Interest, 2. Retrieved from http://naecs.crc.uiuc.edu/newsletter/volume2/number4.html
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279–290.10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NSS. (2009). The national student survey. Retrieved from http://www.thestudentsurvey.com/
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, P., Mulder, R., & Baik, C. (2009). Involving students in peer review – Case studies and practical strategies for university teaching. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Scaife, B. (2007). IT consultancy plagiarism detection software report for JISC Plagiarism advisory service. IT Consultancy Report. Retrieved from http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/documents/resources/PDReview-Reportv1_5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2008). Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 265–269.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276. doi: http://10.3102/0034654306800324910.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torbert, W. (2001). The practice of action inquiry. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research – Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 250−260). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Turnitin2. (2011). Turnitin Products. Retrieved from http://submit.ac.uk/en_gb/products
   Google Scholar
• Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. F., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20, 72–83.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zundert, M. V., Sluijsmans, D., & Merriënboer, J. V. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270–279.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar