References
- Adler, N., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 72–95.10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012181
- Agre, P. (2002). Networking on the network: A guide to professional skills for PhD students. Los Angeles: University of California.
- Altman, Y., & Baruch, Y. (2008). Strategies for revising and resubmitting papers to refereed journals. British Journal of Management, 19, 89–101.10.1111/bjom.2008.19.issue-1
- Berridge, J., & Wilkinson, A. (1999). Publishing, not perishing: Getting your research into the right journal. The New Academic, 8, 16–20.
- Bunderson, J., & Thompson, J. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 32–57.10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32
- Fulmer, I. S. (2012). Editor’s comments: The craft of writing theory articles – Variety and similarity in academy of management review. Academy of Management Review, 37, 327–331.10.5465/amr.2012.0026
- Harzing, A. (2011). The publish or persih handbook: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. Melbourne: Tarma software limited.
- Rousseeuw, P. J. (1991). Why the wrong papers get published. Chance: New Directions for Statistics and Computing, 4, 41–43.
- Starbuck, W. (2006). The production of knowledge. Oxford: Open University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288533.001.0001
- Willmott, H. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18, 429–442.10.1177/1350508411403532
Further reading
- Barley, S. R. (2006). When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 16–20.
- Daft, R. L. (1995). Why I recommend that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (2nd ed., pp. 164–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Public Policy Group, LSE. (2011). Maximizing the impacts of your research: A handbook for social scientists. Consultation draft 3. London, UK: LSE Public Policy Group, London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35758/1/Handbook_PDF_for_the_LSE_impact_blog_April_2011.pdf