‘I didn’t have a clue what they were talking about’: PhD candidates and theory

References

• Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Newly betwixt and between: Revising liminality in the context of a teacher preparation program. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 37, 110–127.10.1525/aeq.2006.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2002). Ground rules of good research: A ten point guide for social researchers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 557–570.10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., & Bourke, S. (2013, August). Examiner reference to theory in PhD theses. Paper presented at the responsible teaching and sustainable learning: 15th Biennial conference for research on learning and instruction, Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, A. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R., & Simpson, B. (2012). Writes of passage: Writing up qualitative data as a threshold concept in doctoral research. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 735–746.10.1080/13562517.2012.678328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2009a). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 293–304.10.1080/14703290903069001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2009b). Isn’t research just research? What are candidates and supervisors thinking? In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research: Policy and practice (pp. 161–174). Berks: SRHE, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research and Development, 28, 431–441.10.1080/07294360903067930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2010). Liminal spaces and doctoral examining: Evidence of research learning. In M. Kiley (Ed.), Quality in postgraduate research: Educating researchers for the 21st century (pp. 219–223). Adelaide: CEDAM, The ANU.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2012). Successful research supervision: Advising students doing research. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M., Feldon, D., Timmerman, B., & Chao, J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research and Development, 33, 669–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (Eds.). (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 369–386.10.1080/0307507022000011507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2004). The doctoral examination process: A handbook for students, examiners and supervisors. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 305–316.10.1080/14703290903069027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (1979). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In W. Less & E. Vogt (Eds.), Reader in comparative religion (pp. 234–243). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., Kiley, M., & Aiston, S. (2006). Making the learning leap: Research students crossing conceptual thresholds. In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: Knowledge creation in testing times (pp. 195–201). Canberra: CEDAM, The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar