Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: doctoral students and supervisors perceptions about the supervisory activities

References

• Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2012). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 432–445. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brailsford, I. (2010). Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on history PhD. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, K. (2003). Learning experiences of doctoral students in UK universities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23, 4–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31, 87–107.10.1177/030631201031001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director or critical friend?: Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 489–500.10.1080/13562510802193905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2009). Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education, 58, 97–112.10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 669–700.10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. (2010). Entering different worlds. Socialization into disciplinary communities. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar. Socialization and development in doctoral education (pp. 79–95). Virginia, VA: Stylus, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: PhD students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 535–555.10.1080/03075070500249161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., Shanahan, M. P., & Laugksch, R. C. (2005). Students' conceptions of research. I: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 225–244.10.1080/00313830500109535
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 48–76.10.1177/2345678906292462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, N., Bain, J., & Conrad, L. (2007). Orientations to research higher degree supervision. Higher Education, 53, 209–234.10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 135–150.10.1080/03075070220119986c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Doctoral students’ sense of relational agency in their scholarly communities. International Journal of Higher Education, 1, 136–149.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 221–232.10.1080/13601440903106551
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Stubb. J., & Tuomainen, J. (2011). International evaluation of research and doctoral education at the University of Helsinki – To the top and out to society. Summary report on doctoral students’ and principal investigators’ doctoral training experiences. Retrieved from http://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/evaluation2011/Survey+on+doctoral+training
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Exploring the fit between doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of resources and challenges ‘vis a vis’ the doctoral journey. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 395–414.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, S., & Moilanen, A. (2012). International evaluation of research and doctoral training at the University of Helsinki 2005–2010. Administrative Publications 81. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Seagram, B. C., Gould, J., & Pyke, S. W. (1998). An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degrees. Research in Higher Education, 39, 319–335.10.1023/A:1018781118312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. J. (1993, August). Factors affecting research student completion. Paper presented in the 15th annual forum of the European Association for Institutional Research, Turku, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T., & Cochrane, R. (2000). Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 181–195.10.1080/713696139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar